Sliced inference such as SAHI is the standard remedy for small objects in high-resolution imagery, but its gains are usually measured against low-resolution baselines. We revisit sliced inference with scale as the explicit variable and ask when tiling actually pays off. We compare seven dense detectors from four families on VisDrone and DOTA, under pre-specified hypotheses, calibration-only tuning and a single evaluation on held-out test data. Two findings emerge. First, much of the benefit attributed to slicing is a resolution effect: on VisDrone, a single pass trained at a higher resolution outperforms tiling with box fusion (merging decoded boxes) for every detector that could be trained at that resolution, and at equal compute a higher resolution helps more than a larger model. Second, tiles carry complementary information that box fusion wastes. We introduce SCAHI (Slicing with Coverage-Aware Hyper Inference), which accumulates the dense outputs of all passes with weights that give every image position the same total coverage, and reads objects off a peak grid fine enough to keep crowded neighbours apart. On identical passes, SCAHI outperforms box fusion for every YOLO detector on both datasets and matches it for FCOS. On DOTA, whose images far exceed the resolution a single pass can be trained at, tiles with SCAHI beat the best single pass for every detector, by 4.3 to 5.6 mAP50 at 2048 px, and replacing only SAHI's merge step by SCAHI adds 2.3 to 4.0 mAP50. An ablation attributes the gain to the border weighting and the resolution of the peak grid. Source code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12657
Media bias understanding and detection remains an under-researched problem for Indian context, specifically for Indic languages, such as, Hindi, which is widely spoken in India. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive, multi-annotator, explainable dataset consisting of 448 unique articles from four leading Indian news agencies publishing in Hindi. We focus on Hindi, the most spoken and an official language of India. The study of media bias is particularly relevant in the Indian context due to the country's linguistic diversity and large population, where the same event is often reported by multiple news agencies in different languages, thereby introducing scope for bias. The dataset comprises Hindi political news articles annotated by 14 experts and classified into four bias categories - selection bias, framing bias, clickbait bias and omission bias - when an article is identified as biased or unbiased. For each biased article, annotators also provide a textual explanation, enabling future semi-automated approaches to incorporate explainability when language models reason over the dataset. Cohen's Kappa scores were 0.81 for simple bias/no-bias classification reflecting strong inter-annotator agreement. For the multi-label task, the Cohen's Kappa values are 0.89, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.79 for clickbait, selection, framing, and omission biases, respectively, resulting in an average Kappa of 0.80, which also reflects strong agreement.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13686
Predicting gene expression directly from hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) images offers a scalable and cost-effective approach to deriving spatial molecular insights from routine histology. Pathology foundation models, typically pretrained using tile-level objectives, may not adequately capture the fine-grained cellular features required for single-cell molecular prediction. In this work, we systematically evaluate and establish domain-informed and task-specific strategies for adapting pathology foundation models to single-cell spatial gene expression prediction. Using paired H&E and Xenium 5K data, our approach improves mean gene-wise Pearson correlation by 2.67x over the standard zero-shot baseline and achieves state-of-the-art performance on this task. We demonstrate strong gene-detection performance across the full gene panel (AUROC = 0.800) and importantly identify that predictive performance varies substantially across biological contexts, with our model achieving its highest Pearson correlation for spatially variable genes (r = 0.643). Our findings demonstrate that, despite the challenges of sparse single-cell measurements, H&E-derived representations can recover biologically meaningful spatial expression patterns, highlighting both the opportunities and limitations of morphology-based molecular inference at cellular resolution.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13649
Smart industrial solutions that can address multiple tasks require models that understand the underlying processes. We examine representation learning for modeling the injection moulding process as an example of such solutions. We consider its data efficiency and multi-modal benefit compared to classical machine learning alternatives. To this end, we synthesize a process-informed dataset based on a real reference cycle of an Erlanger Träger part. We then introduce MouldIt, a temporal convolution and attention based variational autoencoder that reconstructs in-mould signals, while classifying parts as acceptable or as one of our synthetic failure modes. We evaluate MouldIt on two tasks, known-class classification and unknown-class detection, across nine dataset sizes in single-modal and multi-modal settings. We compare it with an accept-all baseline and the classical methods k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, random forests, and principal component analysis, which we adapt to support both tasks. MouldIt outperforms classical methods across both tasks from 4000 cycles in the single-modal setting and from 2000 cycles in the multi-modal setting. It achieves part sorting losses of 6.0 $\pm$ 0.7% and 1.0 $\pm$ 0.3% in the single-modal and multi-modal settings respectively, ranking first across all baselines and a combination of principal component analysis and random forests.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13646
Video LLMs fail conspicuously at counting how many times an object crosses the screen, a failure attributed to missing object permanence. Using construction-grounded synthetic testbeds with validated labels, we show this attribution is incomplete: the count signal is present but unread - linear probes decode per-window presence at 93% while global count decoding collapses to a duration confound. Concurrent work reports the same representation-output dissociation for repetition counting; we show that in exit-and-reappear event counting it is repairable: two readout-directed repairs (episode-localization supervision and a discrete event-symbol side channel) raise same-object counting from 46.7% to 65.0% (oracle 66.7%) on a chance-33% benchmark across 7B-30B systems. Transfer to an independent factory costs nothing, and a measurement audit exposes five data-integrity failures that had obscured the boundary. A real-video audit (REALCOUNT, n=18, blind-audited) shows the boundary persists - best 55.6% at chance 33.3% - and symbol transfer fails zero-shot. A 1-epoch in-domain adaptation bench is negative (six levers at 28-50%), but 3 epochs reverse this for the symbol channel: with oracle timelines the reader reaches 94.4% sequence-disjoint (and 100% strict on the full set), while the deployed 2-epoch head reaches 61.1% in all three seeds (42-44), no better than a shuffled-symbol control (61.1% seed 42, 66.7% seed 43), and one clip above the unadapted reader (55.6%). The residual gap is detector evidence, not reader capacity: the same reader reaches 72.2-88.9% on GT timelines. The failure is repairable with informative timelines, but the deployed head remains the bottleneck; a frozen-feature boundary probe is weak (AUC 0.62 vs. 0.51 permutation) and non-transferring (0.77 within-clip vs. 0.62 across windows).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09949
Uncertainty estimation has been a long-standing challenge in AI models; it amounts to "knowing what you don't know," and metacognition is notoriously difficult even for humans (cf. the Dunning-Kruger effect). Although it is still far from solved even in simpler classification systems, tackling it in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is becoming increasingly important. Within MLLMs, uncertainty can stem from any of the diverse sources as well as from their relationships, and further can stem from the unbounded answers in the open-ended setting. To tackle the issues, we propose CoMet, an MLLM uncertainty estimation method by decomposing uncertainty into a context-specific term and a multiplicity-specific term. The former captures ambiguity induced by the given context (e.g., task or prompt), while the latter captures how many plausible answers determined by the context remain compatible with the given input. We train a lightweight post-hoc uncertainty module to estimate these quantities, which enables efficient uncertainty estimation without autoregressive answer generation or repeated sampling. Experiments on various open-ended multimodal benchmarks, hallucination detection, and multiple-choice visual question answering benchmarks show that CoMet consistently improves uncertainty estimation over existing baselines while remaining efficient in practice. Code is available at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.32012
Traffic cameras continuously record urban road-user behavior, providing proactive safety evidence beyond crash reports. Yet safety-critical events - conflicts, near misses, unsafe turns, sudden braking, and crosswalk interactions - are rare and brief, buried in hours of routine footage. Existing traffic-video pipelines extract detections, trajectories, and risk scores but process footage uniformly, without adapting to an analyst's query. Vision-language methods improve scene understanding but often lack traffic-specific verification of participant-level conflicts. We introduce AgenticConflictLens, an agentic, query-conditioned framework for efficient, auditable conflict extraction from long fixed-camera traffic videos. Given a natural-language safety query, a Traffic-Aware Controller combines structured traffic memory with specialized conflict-analysis tools to choose where to search, which road users to examine, and which evidence to verify or reject. A coarse-to-fine search retrieves candidate intervals and applies detailed verification selectively. The framework produces conflict records with refined time intervals, participant pairs, semantic regions, trajectories, motion evidence, uncertainty, rejection reasons, and supporting clips. On 96 annotated hours from Bellevue and NYC DOT, AgenticConflictLens achieves the highest conflict-existence F1 and temporal IoU on both datasets: 0.84 F1/0.77 tIoU on Bellevue and 0.80 F1/0.73 tIoU on NYC DOT, while inspecting only 8.7% and 11.9% of video, respectively. These results support scalable, evidence-grounded urban traffic-safety analysis.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13540
We propose a novel conditional entropy function as a basis for quantifying predictive uncertainty in Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) for glaucoma detection from retinal fundus images. Using the EyePACS-AIROGS-light-V2 and RIM-ONE-DL datasets for validation, we found that our proposed EDL model regularized by conditional entropy function produced uncertainty estimates with substantially lower calibration errors than Deep Ensembles, MC Dropout, post-hoc calibration and the conventional EDL framework based on Dempster uncertainty. To further probe our models' interpretability, we analyzed Grad-CAM heatmaps using a focus index representing spatial concentration. Compared with the other uncertainty quantification methods, EDL models exhibited greater separation between the index distributions of correctly and incorrectly classified fundus images. In particular, false negatives were associated with localized Grad-CAM activations that were displaced from the optic disc, consistent with its established clinical importance in glaucoma assessment. Overall, our findings suggest that our proposed EDL framework for glaucoma detection provides not only enhanced uncertainty calibration but also admits a more physiologically consistent interpretability.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13513
Remote sensing imagery acquired by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) supports wide range of applications; however, deploying machine learning (ML) models on resource-constrained aerial platforms introduces challenges beyond predictive accuracy, particularly when deployment data differ from the distributions observed during training. Such shifts are common in remote sensing due to geographic, sensor, seasonal, and other visual variations. A practical solution is to equip deployed models with mechanisms that detect emerging distribution shifts and support subsequent responsive actions. This paper presents an empirical case study of three open-source detection tools: (i) Alibi-Detect; (ii) NannyML; and (iii) PyTorch-OOD. Using cross-dataset remote-sensing shifts, we evaluate both detection effectiveness and computational latency of these tools. Our results reveal differences in detection behavior and processing cost across methods and implementations, highlighting trade-offs between detection capability and response-time. These findings motivate further work toward lightweight, and latency-aware monitoring mechanisms for resource-constrained systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13510
Large language models (LLMs) offer a scalable approach for annotating mental health and crisis-related social media content, but their reliability in safety-critical tasks remains unclear. This study evaluates LLM-based crisis-severity annotation of veteran-related social media posts against annotations from eight Veteran Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). Using 149 tweets and five severity categories, we evaluate 15 open-source and 10 proprietary LLMs across eight prompt variants, examining annotation performance, inter-model agreement, prompt sensitivity, and high-severity crisis detection. Human reviewers showed higher ordinal than nominal agreement ({\alpha} = 0.494), indicating that disagreements often occurred between neighboring severity levels. In contrast, selected LLMs demonstrated substantially higher inter-model consistency, with ordinal agreement ({\alpha}) reaching 0.8336 under the baseline prompt. Proprietary models generally showed better agreement with expert annotations and greater stability than open-source models. GPT-5.6-Terra achieved the best overall performance, while the open-source Qwen2.5-7B showed the strongest performance in identifying Acute Crisis with Suicidal Ideation cases. However, higher model consistency did not necessarily correspond to agreement with human judgments or reliable detection of rare high-severity cases. Label-flipped demonstration experiments also revealed model-specific sensitivity to misleading in-context examples, while explanatory demonstrations did not consistently improve performance. Overall, LLMs show promise as scalable complements to expert annotation, but require careful evaluation before use in high-stakes mental health applications.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10048
Existing cooperative end-to-end driving works at Class A (status-sharing) of the SAE J3216 classes of cooperative driving automation (CDA): vehicles exchange what they perceive, not what they intend, so each plans alone when to go, which limits cooperation and leads to deadlock when both vehicles yield or to collisions when both go. We present When2Go, a cooperative end-to-end driving system that learns when to go by sharing intent under CDA Class B or higher. Each vehicle broadcasts its LiDAR detections with forecast motion as instance tokens, together with its plan and intended trajectory. The receiver draws the fused detections, forecasts and partner plans into a route-time conflict map, the occupancy along its route over the planning horizon, on which a planner scores candidate speed profiles. Where two intended trajectories conflict, an order gate, a precedence network distilled from a right-of-way rule, decides who goes first; both vehicles evaluate it on the same messages and so reach the same order. When2Go imitates the rule-based expert of V2Xverse, which sees the simulator's ground truth; stops that When2Go cannot observe within its 2 s planning horizon are relabelled, so that it does not learn to wait without an observable cause. For our runs only, the benchmarks' PID controller steers by When2Go's waypoints instead of the route, and its forced push of long-waiting vehicles is off. With one model, When2Go sets the state of the art on three closed-loop CARLA benchmarks: 97.8 and 90.7 driving score on InterDrive without and with traffic (best published 90.1 and 78.9), 70.0 on the public V2Xverse protocol (best of sixteen rerun methods 59.1) and 88.2 on MDrive (best rerun 85.1), with 95.0% of its vehicles collision-free (87.7%).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13494
Event cameras record asynchronous changes in brightness. To use a general visual model as a recording trigger, a system must represent these measurements in a form the model can interpret. We compare direct grayscale accumulation, two temporal encodings, and two intensity reconstructors on paired real event data. On 192 windows from four held-out DSEC recordings, thresholds calibrated only on development data yielded 40 of 52 person detections and 12 of 140 background positives with E2VID. The strongest direct temporal encoding at an admissible fixed cutoff yielded 14 detections and seven background positives. A retrospective comparison at a common 10% background-positive cap yielded 40 detections for E2VID and at most 19 for any direct encoding. FireNet+ had lower preparation cost and produced 21 detections with zero observed background positives at its frozen cutoff. On the same 192 windows, Qwen3-VL-4B yielded 33/52, 2/140 with E2VID and 9/52, 9/140 with the highest-recall direct rendering, the three-bin image (person detections, background positives). A 96-second exploratory replay illustrates the sensitivity of episode capture and recording starts to cutoff selection. The experiments identify a detection benefit from reconstruction under controlled input history and distinguish it from the cost and false starts of continuous triggering.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13488
This paper tackles the task of hand-object contact transition detection in egocentric video, which aims to localize the two temporal boundaries of a contact episode: the moment a hand first establishes contact with an object (touch) and the moment contact is released (release). We propose a unified framework that jointly models the interacting hand and object to accurately localize both transition types. The proposed framework augments hand-centric spatiotemporal representations with object-aware features learned directly from the video and introduces a transition-aware event spotting formulation tailored to contact transitions, without relying on external object or hand-object interaction detectors during inference. To support this task, we present ContactTransition, a dataset comprising 4,021 egocentric videos with 8,498 touch and 8,077 release annotations, together with object-of-interest supervision. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms strong two-stage and end-to-end event-spotting baselines on both transition types. Finally, we show that detected contact transitions provide effective temporal anchors for downstream egocentric hand-object reasoning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13486
Practitioners often combine independently trained models while keeping their weights frozen. These experts are commonly combined through their final predictions, although their internal features may retain useful information that those predictions omit. We ask when combining features improves on combining predictions, and how to make that comparison fair. We introduce a reusable evaluation protocol, apply it to 21 frozen deepfake detectors from DF40 (Yan et al., 2024), and audit how evaluation choices change the conclusions. The protocol uses strong prediction baselines, compares simple and larger feature combiners, varies architecture and training data separately, and reports results by held-out generator with train/test overlap controls. Under leave-one-generator-out evaluation, logistic regression on the features of six architecture-diverse experts improves macro AUROC by 0.081 over the best tested prediction combiner in each fold, with gains on seven of eight generators. The larger network shows no clear improvement over the linear model (approximately 3.5M versus 10K parameters), suggesting that access to richer information matters more than additional combiner capacity on this pool. Features may help when they retain information that the predictions omit and that transfers to new generators. Predictions may be enough when the strongest prediction baseline already performs well, while neither approach reliably compensates for poor expert transfer. Weakening prediction baselines on the overlap-affected standard split inflates the apparent feature advantage by up to 0.172 AUROC. Overlap-aware evaluation also changes the estimated gain, though the contrast does not isolate overlap. Results by generator and expert pool show where the advantage holds, weakens, or reverses. Without these controls, the same benchmark can support different conclusions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13356
Diffusion models are powerful generative methods for learning and sampling from complex data distributions. Safely deploying these models requires detecting inputs that fall outside their training distribution. Because diffusion models recover clean samples from noisy inputs, reconstruction error is often used for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. This approach assumes that in-distribution (ID) inputs are reconstructed more accurately than OOD inputs. However, OOD inputs may be reconstructed equally well or even better, making this score unreliable. We therefore propose the leading sensitivity spectrum of intermediate denoising features as a complementary OOD signal and demonstrate that it remains informative when reconstruction error is misleading. We introduce DUal-readout of diffusion models for OOD detection (DUO), a fully unsupervised, training-free OOD detector that combines reconstruction error and feature sensitivity. DUO improves average AUROC by approximately 6% points over the strongest baselines while substantially reducing inference cost, and achieves SOTA on near-OOD and high-resolution benchmarks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13304
Millimeter-wave (mmWave) radar provides weather-robust sensing and direct Doppler measurements, yet automotive perception pipelines often reduce its output to sparse point clouds or two-dimensional projections, leaving raw range-azimuth-Doppler (RAD) cubes underutilized. Ego motion induces Doppler responses from world-static structures, while Doppler wrapping aliases radial velocities, complicating moving-object detection and velocity estimation. We present RaMOD (Radar-based Moving-Object Detection), a real-time framework for moving-object detection and velocity estimation from raw RAD cubes acquired by a vehicle-mounted single-chip radar. RaMOD explicitly estimates frame-wise ego motion and uses the estimated radar translational velocity to predict the Doppler region of world-static structures and suppress returns within it. It temporally encodes the suppressed cubes into multi-scale features to predict RAD-space boxes with class labels. For each detected object, it predicts radial and forward velocities under raw-Doppler and Doppler-unwrapped hypotheses, together with Doppler-wrapping probabilities. On our BRIDGE-Liv dataset, RaMOD outperforms all compared raw-radar methods across RAD-cube, RA, and RD detection settings, achieving 80.8% cube mAP at IoU 0.30, 15.7 percentage points above the strongest RAD-cube baseline. Velocity MAE is 1.128 m/s, with 99.87% Doppler-wrapping accuracy.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13271
Audio deepfake detectors that work well on clean lab recordings often degrade after telephone or platform compression. This paper asks a specific question: which low-dimensional acoustic descriptors stay informative after codec degradation? We screen 36 utterance-level features(formants, PNCCs, LFCCs, prosody) on ASVspoof 2019 data and test on the official ASVspoof 2021 LA set across seven codec conditions. Of 33 statistically significant descriptors, only four show large practical separation (|r| >0.5, bootstrap 95% CIs), all first-formant (F1) measures, highly redundant (PC1: 79% variance). The payoff is stability: the 36-feature SVM degrades 14 pp under codec mismatch (9.5%-23.5% EER), while the four-feature RBF-SVM degrades only 5.9 pp (17.0%-22.9%). The F1 subset varies 3.4 pp across conditions versus 13.1 pp for the full set. F1 differences persist after controlling for speaker identity (p greater than 10^10, mixed-effects model). The results suggest that physically interpretable F1 statistics offer a compact, codec-stable diagnostic signal that may complement higher accuracy neural detectors.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13258
When an LLM agent fails part-way through a long task, the usual analysis records a symptom: a failure-mode label, or the agent and step judged responsible. It does not say where the error entered, which state carried it to the symptom, whether anything in the trajectory contradicted it, or which control could have caught it. We define an episode record that ties a candidate fault to its origin, propagation, detection, response and consequence, located by operational phase and state domain, and that names the control families whose observation and reach cover it. We turned the record into a written annotation protocol and applied it to 95 failed runs of six multi-agent systems from the public Who&When and MAD corpora, reading each trajectory in full. Faults enter early (median at 0.18 of the run), mostly as wrong decisions or fabrications over task state, and in 37 of 88 Who&When runs before the step the corpus' human labels mark as decisive. In 72% of failed runs the trajectory already contained evidence against the error before the failure; in 88% of those no agent acted on it. Something flagged a deviation in 31% of runs, but no response removed the deviated state. Independent judges reading the unused evidence, task contracts fixed at admission, and re-checking beliefs against the environment reach most episodes; restoring the agent's own state would have sufficed in 35 of 95 runs. A text scan of the raw corpus also shows that 45% of the hand-crafted Who&When failures ended with a provider content-filter crash after which the harness emitted a final answer no agent produced, a failure class that neither symptom taxonomies nor responsible-agent labels represent. Protocol, records and scripts are included.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13254
Vision-based rover autonomy requires integrating perception, localization, planning and platform-specific control under limited sensing and computing resources. We present an open-source ROS 2 stack for following directional arrows, reaching a terminal cone and returning autonomously to the start. It connects YOLOv8n detection and geometric direction, range and bearing estimation with RGB-D SLAM, wheel-inertial state estimation, kinematics-aware planning, behavior-tree mission management and STM32 actuation. Standard interfaces separate reusable autonomy from the hardware layer; a proportional path-following plugin supports low-speed rover motion. Public resources include software, configuration, a labeled dataset, trained weights and evaluation logs. On 478 held-out images, the detector achieves mAP@0.5 of 0.720 under the Ultralytics evaluator and outperforms a classical OpenCV baseline under a shared evaluation protocol. The reported perception latency is 25 ms on a Jetson Orin NX. Three missions, one indoor and two outdoor, demonstrate marker-guided navigation and autonomous return without operator motion commands or reported collisions. Field results document integration failures and corrective choices; repeated instrumented trials remain necessary to quantify physical navigation errors and reliability.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08100
Accurate and timely identification of road closures is critical for large-scale navigation and logistics systems, yet remains challenging due to the need to jointly reason over visual evidence, spatial context, and road network topology. Existing approaches either rely on manual map updates or focus on detecting closure-related objects without resolving which road segment is affected. In this work, we introduce a unified multimodal and multitask framework that jointly performs road closure classification (no, partial, complete) and road segment association within a single learning architecture. Our model integrates graph-structured map data, satellite imagery augmented with projected street-level detections, and street-view images using modality-specific encoders and cross-modal transformer attention, enabling explicit reasoning over visual cues and network topology. Evaluated on nearly 20K real-world scenarios collected from a large-scale commercial vehicle fleet, our approach achieves 72.7% closure classification accuracy and 60% road segment association accuracy, outperforming frontier vision-language models by over 28 percentage points on closure classification while being over 4,000x smaller and 100x faster at inference. Extensive ablations demonstrate the importance of cross-modal attention, edge-aware pooling, and graph message passing for accurate geospatial reasoning. This work establishes the first benchmark for joint road closure classification and segment-level attribution, and shows that task-specific architectural inductive biases substantially outperform general-purpose multimodal models for structured geospatial understanding.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13192