DeepLearning (DL)-based Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems have shown great promise in supporting clinicians, but their performance heavily depends on the availability of large, well-annotated datasets. In medical lesion detection, the scarcity of comprehensive, stan dardized annotations and the heterogeneity of existing datasets limit the development of robust foundation models. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to building a multi-domain foundation model for le sion detection by integrating diverse medical image datasets annotated for both anatomical structures and abnormalities. We first propose a student-teacher training strategy to effectively combine datasets with heterogeneous label spaces, mitigating catastrophic forgetting, and im proving feature learning. In addition, building on our previously pro posed example-based EM-DETR framework, we adapt it to jointly learn from multiple domain-specific datasets, enabling fine-grained, example driven detection across modalities. Our model achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results, with image-level AUC scores exceeding previous SOTA by 1% point on four key findings in CXRs. We achieve a leading mAP50 in CXRs and mammography, surpassing EM-DETR trained on a single dataset by 2-3% points. This approach paves the way for scalable foundation models in medical imaging that leverage heterogeneous data while maintaining robust and generalizable performance.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14518
Biological visual systems compute reliably under tight metabolic and wiring constraints, whereas artificial vision systems consume far more energy and can be sensitive to adversarial perturbations. Whether networks with brain-like wiring are more robust at lower computational cost is unclear. We address this by benchmarking a task-optimized, continuous-time recurrent neural network of the fly visual system constrained by its synaptic connectome (FlyNet) against artificial neural networks. We compare it against CNNs, RAFT, and continuous-time recurrent neural networks without detailed connectome constraints (sCTRNN, CTRNN) on a collision-detection task within a differentiable 3D rendering pipeline. FlyNet is adversarially vulnerable but, relative to its compute, more robust to common video corruptions than RAFT, while using up to five orders of magnitude fewer FLOPs. The CTRNNs remain more robust than FlyNet across almost all tested perturbations, suggesting that connectome constraints benefit efficiency, through their low edge count, over robustness. Recurrence improves robustness to white-box attacks in RAFT and temporal context improves robustness to common corruptions. FlyNet's position and velocity representations degrade under adversarial textures but recover under counterfactual textures that restore correct classification while staying equally far from training, ruling out unfamiliar textures as the cause of failure. The reverse-phi illusion similarly disrupts these representations and inverts the same low-level motion statistic as the adversarial textures. Optimizing this input statistic alone, without access to the network, suffices to induce classification failure, attributing both perturbations to the same circuit vulnerability. Connectome-constrained models can thus surface adversarial failure mechanisms as testable hypotheses about biological perceptual vulnerabilities.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14498
Deploying LLM-based analytics agents in enterprise settings requires evaluation frameworks that can reliably detect failures across complex, multi-tool workflows. We present a three-phase comparative study of three evaluation frameworks, each representing a distinct evaluation paradigm (trace-based LLM judging, text-only LLM judging with red-teaming, and deterministic heuristics), applied to two analytics agents in a controlled research setting using frozen execution traces. Phase 1 quantifies evaluation harness stability through repeated measurements, finding that 97% of configurations meet the stability threshold and that stability patterns are agent-independent. Phase 2 measures known risk detection on 72 ground-truth test cases, where the trace-based framework achieves the best precision-recall balance (F1=0.90) while text-only evaluation matches on recall but generates 5x more false alarms. Phase 3 evaluates unknown risk discovery, uncovering 24 novel failures with zero overlap between functional testing and security red-teaming. Our results demonstrate that (1) the information available to the evaluation harness determines evaluation quality, (2) functional and security evaluation are complementary, and (3) LLM-based evaluation harnesses surface subtle errors that human reviewers miss. We recommend a two-framework strategy: trace-based evaluation for functional assessment and adversarial red-teaming for security validation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14493
In this paper, we present 1020 Group's submission to the WMT26 shared task on automated quality evaluation. Our system, Pterodactyl, was engineered specifically for subtasks 2 and 3, that is, segment-level quality score prediction and the detection of error-free segments. Pterodactyl is a highly customizable, ultra-low cost system optimized for binary classification in translation triage and data curation. It is based on an LLM-as-a-judge approach, with prompt engineering and model selection guided by ROC analysis. We also developed several variants of Pterodactyl that were specifically adapted for subtasks 3.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14480
Deepfake detectors are commonly evaluated on real/fake classification alone, but real-world applications require explanations of the visual evidence behind each prediction. Joint vision-language models struggle with authenticity assessment, producing "real" narratives for manipulated images. To address this, we propose a decoupled predict-then-explain pipeline as our submission to the ACM Multimedia 2026 Explainable Deepfake Detection Challenge, with methods trained and evaluated on the XPlainVerse benchmark. A vision-foundation-model ensemble first classifies the image, then a Qwen3-VL-8B model generates a decision-conditioned explanation of the visual evidence. For fake images, a second Qwen3-VL-8B compresses that text into a short non-expert summary without using the image. We further apply metric-aligned Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to optimize both explainers against the challenge criteria. Under matched conditions, GRPO raises complex BERTScore-F1 from 0.686 to 0.712 and also improves grounding (entity and evidence F1); our submission ranked first on complex BERTScore-F1 and seventh overall.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14436
Branch-and-Bound (B&B) and $A^*$ are popular exact search methods originating from Operations Research and Artificial Intelligence, respectively. Although the two methods share fundamental search principles, their different ways of exploring the search space can lead to substantially different computational performance. We investigate these differences using the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem (RCPSP) as an exemplary problem setting. We first establish the relationships between mixed-integer linear programming, state-action, and timed Petri-net representations. Since B&B and $A^*$ admit numerous algorithmic enhancements, we focus on relatively basic implementations. This allows us to examine the fundamental differences between the methods rather than compare the performance of state-of-the-art solvers. By using the same lower bound and best-first node selection, we isolate the effects of the search mechanisms, particularly the identification of equivalent states reached through different scheduling decision sequences. Experiments on 480 benchmark RCPSP instances show that graph-based $A^*$ substantially outperforms the B&B variants considered. With additional pruning rules, $A^*$ proves optimality for all 480 instances, compared with 445 for best-first B&B under the same time and memory limits. Depth-first B&B uses less memory and can find feasible solutions even when the search does not finish within the time limit. Stronger linear programming relaxations reduce the search space but introduce considerable computational overhead. Our findings highlight the importance of duplicate-state detection and clarify the computational trade-offs between the search approaches. These insights can help researchers select an appropriate method and identify opportunities to incorporate effective mechanisms from one approach into the other.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14426
Fetal brain biometry provides a quantitative basis for assessing prenatal growth and identifying congenital brain abnormalities. However, comprehensive assessment remains limited by labor-intensive manual measurements and automated models that lose accuracy across imaging sequences and institutions. We introduce BioTTA, an anatomically guided test-time adaptation framework that measures 11 fetal brain biometrics from reconstructed three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. BioTTA adapts pretrained models to individual unlabeled volumes using geometric consistency and atlas priors, without access to source images. In a retrospective study across five centers in China and Switzerland, BioTTA improved measurement accuracy across three out-of-distribution datasets and two network architectures. It reduced mean absolute measurement errors by 46-82% relative to the corresponding models without adaptation, achieving errors similar to those of supervised fine-tuning. Its measurements were mapped onto normative growth trajectories derived from expert annotations, enabling gestational-age-specific assessment through a web-based reporting platform. Across four disease cohorts, the platform achieved 82.1-95.0% accuracy in binary detection of ventriculomegaly or cerebellar abnormalities, with performance similar to that of a senior radiologist. BioTTA provides a practical foundation for standardized fetal brain biometry across heterogeneous imaging settings, supporting scalable prenatal growth assessment and quantitative evaluation of brain abnormalities.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23966
Many scientific and policy decisions require estimating the total number of target objects across a large image collection. Exhaustive human labeling is often infeasible, while raw model predictions can be biased, especially under domain shift. Recent human-AI estimation methods combine imperfect model predictions with limited human verification to obtain reliable collection-level estimates. However, existing work provides little guidance on how practitioners should choose among models, estimators, and adaptation strategies for a new deployment. We study these choices within a common human-in-the-loop counting framework across 12 tasks spanning biomedical microscopy, ground-level and aerial wildlife surveys, and overhead imagery of urban structures. Our results show that modern multimodal models provide a strong, training-free starting point for many tasks, while fine-tuned detectors become more advantageous at larger labeling budgets and across repeated deployments. Estimation efficiency improves further when model predictions are used to prioritize which units humans label, rather than sampling uniformly. We also find that each model's ranking quality can be estimated with a small pilot set, yielding practical guidance for selecting strategies on new counting tasks. In a field deployment on aerial pronghorn surveys, a task-specific adaptation of these methods meets the survey's $\pm 5\%$ tolerance after reviewing a median of only $3.2\%$ of collected images.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14380
Deploying vision transformer models across connected and automated vehicles (CAVs) requires joint management of computation and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication. Static split-inference methods use fixed partition points and cannot adapt to time-varying link bandwidth, processing load, and concurrent multi-stream traffic. This paper proposes an edge orchestration framework that jointly selects model partition points, per-layer quantization bitwidths, and execution placement across heterogeneous vehicular compute nodes. The joint partitioning and mixed-precision allocation problem is formulated as a Mixed-Integer Linear Program (MILP) that minimizes compute and communication energy subject to end-to-end latency and task-quality constraints. The framework is evaluated on Jetson Orin Nano (8~GB), Jetson Orin NX (16~GB), and Jetson AGX Orin (32~GB) nodes using OPV2V-driven multi-stream workloads with $K \in \{2,4,6,8\}$. Across the evaluated configurations, the proposed formulation reduces V2V communication energy by $33.3$--$36.0\%$ relative to a Uniform INT8 split. At $K=8$, end-to-end task completion latency is reduced by $34.0\%$ on the Orin Nano and $33.1\%$ on the Orin NX relative to the same baseline, while limiting the reduction in 3D detection accuracy to $3.1$--$4.1$ percentage points in $\mathrm{mAP}_{50}$ relative to FP16 execution.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14196
We present our system for the SHROOM-visions 2026 shared task on character-level hallucination span detection in image-conditioned vision-language model (VLM) responses, evaluated across English, French, Italian, and Chinese. The detector is built on a frozen Gemma-4-12B-it backbone with trainable LoRA adapters (approximately 10.7M parameters). Because the backbone is a causal decoder, hidden states read from a single copy of an answer cannot attend to subsequent tokens; we therefore repeat the candidate answer within one prompt and extract features from its second occurrence, giving every position approximate bidirectional context in a single non-autoregressive pass. A character-level locator combines intermediate hidden states to predict hallucination probabilities, BIO boundaries, and a response-level abstention score, while separate language-specific classifiers assign one of five hallucination types to each predicted span. On the closed test set, our system reaches a macro-averaged character IoU of 0.4404, more than doubling the official baseline (0.1854), and ranks 5th-6th on IoU across the four languages. On the English tuning split, controlled ablations attribute a gain to the repeated answer that is comparable to that of LoRA adaptation (its held-out gain is smaller and concentrated on hallucinated answers), and they show that the detector relies on the image-answer pairing: shuffling images across examples drives IoU down to the level of the predict-nothing floor or below it in every language. In deployments where the same Gemma-4-12B-it model also generates answers, its base weights can be reused, making the approach practical for local question-answering systems that cannot run a separate verifier.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14100
In this paper, we propose a new paradigm in wildfire management for detecting both visible and obscured fire using Deep Learning (DL). The essence of our method is the joint spatial and temporal analysis of RGB videos, embracing the fact that temporal patterns of smoke motions in consecutive video frames can indicate obscured fire flames. This perspective contrasts the traditional approach of independently analyzing images and individual video frames. To this end, we propose a frame-wise transformer architecture that applies an attention mechanism between the consecutive frames while preserving spatial information within frames as opposed to regular attention mechanisms like the non-local block, which combines spatial and temporal information into a single vector. We also optimize the temporal pattern lengths under different spatial resolutions to achieve the highest performance while reducing the computational cost. To investigate the applicability of our method in aerial image processing, we applied it to a curated version of the FLAME2 dataset that includes dual-mode RGB/IR videos. The IR video feed is used to extract ground truth, while the model is trained only on RGB videos to maintain applicability to lowcost commercial drones (which are equipped only with regular cameras) and facilitate processing existing RGB-only datasets. Our proposed method achieves a Segmentation Foreground Dice score of 92.61%, an Object Detection Precision and Recall rate of 93.21% and 91.73%, and clip-level classification accuracy of 98.02%, respectively. We also investigated the efficacy and generalizability of our method through ablation study
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14074
Misogyny is among the most prevalent forms of online hate speech directed at Brazilian users, yet open and auditable resources dedicated to it in Brazilian Portuguese remain scarce. We introduce MISO-BR, an open, documented and versioned corpus of 896 balanced social media texts annotated for binary misogyny, released with its construction protocol and reproducible baselines. The corpus combines lexicon- and target-guided scraping from X with items imported from OLID-BR, a large language model triage stage whose prompt and decoding parameters are released, and manual annotation by three annotators following a written guide. Inter-annotator reliability reaches a Fleiss' kappa of 0.788 over 816 items. Under a single fixed protocol we compare four classical classifiers (Multinomial and Bernoulli Naive Bayes, a linear SVM and a random forest) with fine-tuned BERTimbau Base and Large. The classical models cluster between 0.651 and 0.676 macro-F1 and are precision-oriented but recall-poor. The transformers reach 0.833 macro-F1 and accuracy (Wilson 95% CI for accuracy [0.77, 0.88]), a gap of roughly 16 points, while Base and Large are indistinguishable on the test set despite a 2.6x difference in training cost. We argue that the value of the resource lies less in its headline scores than in the auditability of its pipeline, and we state three limits that users must reckon with: the artificial class balance, whose effect on precision under realistic prevalence we quantify; the association between provenance and label, which the released source field makes measurable; and the selection bias induced by lexicon-guided sampling and automatic triage. The corpus, annotation guide, models and experimental scripts are publicly available.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14036
Remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) has been proposed as a physiological cue for deepfake detection, based on the premise that synthesized faces lack a genuine cardiac signal. We examine what rPPG-style detectors learn on Celeb-DF++ (22 forgery methods) and FaceForensics++ (FF++), using one identically sampled window per real and fake video. On talking-face forgeries, simple chrominance traces reach an AUC of 0.998, exceeding a dedicated rPPG extractor (0.87). Controlled experiments indicate that this signal is not physiological in origin. On fully synthesized forgeries, it is equally discriminative when extracted from background regions or from full frames without face detection, and it is concentrated above the 0.7 to 4 Hz heart-rate band. It is largely removed by shuffling frame order but persists after normalizing resolution, frame rate and encoding, and an independent reimplementation reproduces these findings. Removing high-frequency content makes most synthesized videos appear real, adding it makes real videos appear fake, and injecting a synthetic pulse has little effect. In controlled self-reenactment experiments with two generators, animating a face from a single frame introduces the same high-frequency signal, whereas reconstructing each frame from its own source does not. Face-based chrominance detectors trained on Celeb-DF++ classify over 99% of real FF++ videos as fake, indicating that they largely encode video source rather than manipulation, and a CLIP-based detector exhibits the same behavior. A frozen CLIP backbone matches or exceeds fusions of CLIP with rPPG and frequency features. Finally, we show that the official Celeb-DF and Celeb-DF++ splits share identities and source-video content between training and test, and that custom protocols reusing test videos and identities in training inflate weaker detectors by up to 0.30 AUC.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13992
Salient and camouflaged object detection (SOD and COD) both recover foreground support, yet most joint methods output only a binary mask and therefore cannot distinguish the type. USC12K distinguishes the two types, but its baseline USCNet still binds foreground existence to the type within a single normalization, so the failure source cannot be attributed. Our cross-task study shows that foreground localization transfers between SOD and COD, whereas type discrimination does not: a COD-only model recovers foreground on SOD images but its type judgement follows the training distribution rather than the foreground-background relation, so the two decisions require separate mechanisms. SegDis factorizes the output into an explicit foreground probability and a conditional type probability given foreground: FLR provides high-quality task-agnostic support, and RTA refines the SOD/COD assignment from the foreground-background relation without a task identifier. Because support is explicit, each ground-truth foreground pixel is classified as correct-type, type-swapped, or missed, so foreground-recovery and type-assignment errors are diagnosed separately. With PVT-v2-B2, SegDis attains 68.98% FG-mIoU and 78.35% mIoU on USC12K at about one-eighth of USCNet's parameters; CSCS is 5.75.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.11378
Automated fruit grading, sorting, and orientation systems require real-time, accurate detection of fruit-level morphological landmarks rather than the fruit boundary alone. This paper presents a custom, fully self-collected and self-annotated dataset of 1506 apple images (1054 training, 301 validation, 151 test) captured under controlled, fixed-camera conditions and annotated for three target classes: fruit body, stem cavity, and calyx. A YOLO11s detector trained with default hyperparameters is adopted as the baseline, and a systematic, one-factor-at-a-time ablation study is conducted across input resolution, data augmentation policy, optimizer configuration, and lightweight architectural enhancement to identify the factors that most improve detection of these fine-grained landmarks under high inter-cultivar color and texture variability. Neither increased input resolution, nor any of six tested augmentation variants, nor manual optimizer tuning improved on the untuned baseline (F1 = 0.9047); only a same-slot architectural substitution of the backbone's C2PSA block with Coordinate Attention (CA) matched the baseline's overall F1 (0.9038) while reducing parameter count by 10.2% and achieving the study's best mAP@0.5 (0.935) and best stem-cavity F1 (0.8217). A confidence-threshold sweep identified 0.15 as the deployment operating point for this model, and a confirmatory experiment combining the CA-swap architecture with the best-performing augmentation variant showed the two effects do not combine additively, reversing the architectural gain rather than compounding it. The resulting design recommendations --- the CA-swap architecture alone, at a 0.15 confidence threshold --- target real-time apple landmark detection for orientation-aware industrial sorting and alignment systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13920
As large language models generate increasingly high-quality responses, recent work on response evaluation has moved beyond response-centered criteria, such as correctness and coherence, toward user-centered criteria, including user preferences and perceived usefulness. This shift is fundamentally important for developing technologies that are truly useful to real-world users. While conventional response evaluation quantifies the quality of the response itself, users' satisfaction in real conversations also depends on their subjective preferences and perceptions of usefulness, which do not necessarily align with response quality. This study investigates whether such user-centered signals can be detected from conversational text. Specifically, we analyze user utterances with self-reported dissatisfaction labels to examine whether user dissatisfaction in text can be detected. In English interaction, models using user utterances exceeded the 17.8% dissatisfaction label prevalence in AUPRC by up to 15 percentage points. These results suggest that user utterances reveal cues to implicit dissatisfaction. Furthermore, changes from the immediately preceding user utterance may improve dissatisfaction detection, with anomaly detection methods appearing particularly effective.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13894
BraTS-METS 2026 Task 1 evaluates segmentation of brain metastases and postoperative resection cavities on heterogeneous multiparametric MRI, requiring detection of small enhancing foci while preserving the geometry and hierarchy of enhancing tumor (ET), tumor core (TC), whole tumor (WT), and resection cavity (RC). We present COMPASS-METS (Component-Aware Multi-Trainer Probability Assembly with Structured Segmentation), which combines three five-fold nnU-Net configurations into aligned regional probability ensembles. A structured-probability anchor applies region-specific component decisions, TC boundary completion, RC filtering, and hierarchy-preserving conversion. Omitted ET candidates are recovered additively using learned component confidence and deterministic multi-trainer support for ET and its TC/WT parents; a final utility gate admits only disconnected candidates with sufficient lesion-existence and geometry-safety probabilities. On the reused 179-case challenge development cohort, COMPASS-METS (Team: MicroBT) achieved Small F1 0.354, lesion-wise DSC 0.712, NSD 0.714, All F1 0.779, and HD95 56.6 mm. Relative to ResEncXL, it improved DSC, NSD, and All F1 and reduced HD95, while Small F1 changed from 0.367 to 0.354. Stagewise analysis attributes the principal geometric gains to structured probability construction and shows that guarded ET refinement recovers most of the associated small-lesion detection loss. These 179-case results remain selection-aware development estimates. The source code is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13884
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitoring is one of the most valuable tools for monitoring advanced AI systems, but it is under threat. We argue that frontier AI developers should report specific indicators to make these threats trackable and to better facilitate coordination to preserve CoT monitorability. We identify five indicators that are both highly relevant and reasonably feasible to disclose, one for each link in a five-step chain on which CoT monitoring depends. The first, third-party CoT access and base architecture specifications, also underpins external verification of the rest. The others span CoT quality (naturalness and faithfulness) and monitoring effectiveness (detection and uplift). An audit of current disclosures by Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google DeepMind shows that no developer covers the full set, but that every indicator has been reported by at least one frontier developer. Because current disclosures rely largely on developers' own evaluations, we also recommend that a cross-developer audit be repeated with deeper access than public disclosures allow, either by embedded evaluators working within developers or by an Independent Verification Organization.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13873
Logical Anomaly Detection (LAD) requires verifying whether all category-specific constraints, such as object counts, pairing relations, and measurement ranges, are satisfied by a query image given only a few normal references. Recent LAD methods based on Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) formulate this as checklist verification, decomposing the decision into independent textual checks. This decomposition, however, is text-only. Every item still reads the same unmodified query image, so the LVLM must extract different forms of visual evidence from one raw image. We identify this text-image mismatch as a constraint-specific perception gap, the source of two failure modes: instance conflation for binding constraints and scale drift for calibration constraints. To diagnose whether these failures stem from insufficient reasoning or insufficient perception, we compare textual reasoning guides and visual perception guides in a training-free setting. Our analysis shows that reasoning over the same image provides little benefit, whereas adapting the visual input to each constraint substantially improves verification accuracy. Based on this finding, we propose CASCADE, a training-free framework that extends checklist decomposition using constraint-specific visual scaffolds. We further introduce CASCADE++, which adapts these scaffolds at the object level by deriving their configurations from the constraint structure and reference distribution. Across MVTec-LOCO and VID-AD, CASCADE++ surpasses the full-shot state of the art by 3.9 AUROC points with only three references, and improves over the strongest VID-AD baseline by 11.4, transferring across multiple LVLM backbones without any training.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13820
Video overlay removal recovers the scene beneath burned-in subtitles, karaoke lyrics, titles, credits, logos and watermarks. Generative video models now fill a known region convincingly, but in practice the region comes from a detector or a segmenter, and it is wrong in both directions: it misses strokes, halos, whole frames and whole objects, and it covers background between characters, around boxes and on genuine scene text. Erasers that treat the mask as a hole, regenerating inside and copying outside, inherit every one of these errors. We present HintErase, which treats localization as a hint, not a hole. The model sees the full, unmasked video together with a hint channel; during training the hint is corrupted the way real localizers fail, while supervision follows the true overlay. The result is a single model that removes overlay the hint missed, keeps background the hint wrongly covered, and is trained to keep genuine scene text even when the hint lands on it. For full-length releases, a streaming pipeline handles interlaced sources, shot cuts, missed and jittering hints, paste-back and audio, with memory independent of the length of the video. This report describes the approach, the pipeline that turns it into full-length deliveries, and qualitative results; video results, with input, hint and output side by side, are on the project page.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13711