Emotion vectors are directions in a language model's internal representations that are associated with emotional concepts. Prior work shows that these vectors can influence model behavior, but their role in sentiment classification remains unclear. This study investigates emotion directions in Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct. Eight directions extracted from GoEmotions are evaluated through sentiment probing, activation interventions, and supervised correction. Emotion-only probes achieve 88.66% and 90.70% accuracy on binary TweetEval. In exploratory matched-ablation experiments, raw emotion-space removal causes 2.39 and 1.10 percentage points more accuracy loss than matched isotropic random-subspace removal for 0.5B and 3B, respectively. All four TweetEval raw and denoised effects are significant after Holm adjustment across eight comparisons. An exploratory SST-2 extension shows smaller raw excess losses of 0.66 and 0.57 points, with no effects surviving Holm adjustment. Frozen sentiment-correction classifiers are also tested on 20,000 Amazon Polarity reviews. Emotion-based correction improves accuracy over uncorrected Qwen, but does not consistently outperform margin-only baselines. These results distinguish sentiment information available in model representations, the effects of changing those representations, and their practical value for classification. They do not establish a uniquely emotional mechanism.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13744
We present Walrus, a unified 8B speech-and-audio foundation model handling speech recognition (including code-switching and multi-talker speech), speech-to-text and speech-to-speech translation, text-to-speech, emotion recognition, audio captioning, and general audio understanding. Our main contribution is not a new architecture but a data-centric training recipe; we use a standard decoder-only backbone initialized from Gemma 4, so that gains can be traced to the data. For speech generation, Walrus predicts low-bitrate discrete speech tokens, and a lightweight token-to-waveform decoder converts them into high-fidelity audio. The recipe is a three-stage data curriculum that moves from broad multilingual data to multi-talker, code-switching, and domain-specific data. At each stage, task-aware and dataset-aware weighting balances tasks with very different token budgets and protects core skills from forgetting. Trained on over 600M samples covering more than 20 tasks and 100 languages, Walrus leads on most multilingual, multi-talker, and code-switching ASR, speech translation, and audio understanding benchmarks, outperforming both open speech language models of comparable size and dedicated task-specific models. On most benchmarks, it even matches or surpasses the $4\times$ larger Qwen3-Omni's performance. Results suggest that data engineering is a primary driver of quality in multi-task speech and audio modeling.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13689
Large language models increasingly evaluate, route, and moderate news, so a model's judgment of a headline has become a gatekeeping decision. We ask whether that judgment follows the fact being reported or the way the fact is framed. We combine an ecological audit of 63,926 Chinese news headlines with a controlled experiment. The experiment covers 30 real events, 30 synthetic events, and 29 natural headline pairs, tested on four Chinese models. Changing only the headline frame shifted both perceived misleadingness and event severity, and the direction and ordering of the shifts were the same for DeepSeek, MiMo, Dots, and LongCat. Emotionally intensified headlines raised severity ratings by 0.65 to 0.88 points, whereas positively reframed headlines lowered them by 0.34 to 0.52 points. Supplying the article body reduced this severity bias by 54 to 80 percent, and all four reductions were significant at p < .01. A small human reference study showed the same direction of effect. Headline-only LLM evaluation therefore carries a measurable robustness gap, and framing sensitivity belongs among the reliability properties that deployment and governance check.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13531
Co-speech gestures can increase engagement and improve speech understanding. Yet, most data-driven robot systems generate either rhythmic beat-like motion or semantically meaningful iconic gestures, but not both. We present an emotion-aware rhythmic-semantic co-speech gesture system that generates iconic and beat behaviors in real time from text and the robot's internal emotional state. We formalize the task of beat-iconic gesture generation using emotion and propose lightweight models that predict iconic timing and intensity, then fill the remaining spans with emotion-conditioned beats at an appropriate intensity level. We train on the BEAT2 dataset and deploy the system on the social robot Haru. In an online user study with 60 participants, our method shows stronger speech-gesture alignment and is preferred over baseline methods.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13472
Lip synchronization, the task of generating realistic lip movements synchronized with audio signals, is fundamental to applications such as film dubbing, virtual avatars, and digital content creation. Recent GAN-based methods offer computational efficiency but often lack visual fidelity, while diffusion-based approaches achieve high-quality results at the cost of substantial computational overhead. Moreover, most existing methods are limited to photo-realistic human faces, restricting their applicability to stylized characters and non-human entities. In this paper, we propose an efficient universal lip-sync video generation framework that achieves high-quality results without compromising computational efficiency. We build on LivePortrait, a warp-based portrait animation model, and introduce a training strategy that aligns audio signals to an implicit motion space by distilling knowledge from a pre-trained video-to-motion model. This enables real-time inference while maintaining high visual fidelity, and naturally generalizes to diverse stylistic characters beyond photo-realistic humans. Furthermore, we introduce an expressive control gate that enables explicit manipulation of emotional expressions for content enrichment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both visual quality and lip-sync accuracy while ensuring real-time inference.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09074
Continuous music emotion recognition (MER) estimates how Arousal and Valence evolve within a song, yet the field's standard metric, pooled frame-level correlation, is dominated by between-song differences and cannot distinguish a model that tracks emotional dynamics from one that only ranks songs by their average level. We decompose annotation variance into between- and within-song components and show that mean squared error (MSE) targets the former, while windowed Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC = $r \cdot C_b$) targets the latter by penalising the variance compression MSE induces. A single weight $\lambda$ controls the trade-off: on 1,764 DEAM songs, raising $\lambda$ from 0 to 1 lowers pooled Arousal $r$ from 0.843 to 0.810 while raising mean within-song $r$ from 0.204 to 0.368. Building on this objective, we present MMAS (Multimodal Music Analysis System), an open-source model that predicts Arousal and Valence every 0.5 s from raw audio. It fuses frozen MERT-v1-95M embeddings with ten symbolic features from automatic transcription through a dual-branch temporal convolutional network with cross-modal attention. Because both branches are audio-derived, one model trains jointly on DEAM and PMEmo without domain conditioning. Under song-grouped 5-fold cross-validation (2,531 songs), pooled $r$ reaches 0.801/0.685 (Arousal/Valence) on DEAM and 0.742/0.746 on PMEmo. Against a ridge baseline on identical features, within-song Arousal $r$ roughly triples (0.344 vs. 0.125; $n = 353$ songs, Wilcoxon $p = 1.7 \times 10^{-21}$, $d = 0.56$). Complete transcription failure costs at most 0.04 pooled $r$. Split-conformal intervals attain 93.7% (Arousal) and 90.0% (Valence) marginal coverage at a 95% target, with the shortfall traced to within-song dependence. MMAS is released as a pip-installable package.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08966
Multimodal emotion recognition in conversations (MERC) integrates textual, acoustic, and visual cues to identify utterance-level emotions. However, existing approaches generally do not explicitly adapt multimodal processing to the degree of inter-modal predictive disagreement. In real conversations, semantic incongruity, concealed emotion, noisy observations, and ambiguity can affect modality-specific emotional evidence differently, while the reliability of individual modalities varies across samples. Rather than identifying each source of inconsistency separately, we model their common consequence for emotion recognition as predictive disagreement among unimodal emotion distributions over the same emotion-label set. Such disagreement makes indiscriminate fusion prone to propagating unreliable or competing evidence. Inspired by the Brunswik Lens Model, we propose MiD-ERC, a divergence-centric framework that quantifies inter-modal predictive disagreement using a normalized divergence score and estimates sample-specific modality reliability. MiD-ERC uses these signals to coordinate divergence-guided cross-modal gating, divergence-modulated reliability weighting, and divergence-conditioned adaptive LLM prompting. The framework is trained end-to-end using only standard emotion annotations, without requiring additional conflict labels, auxiliary data construction, or external retrieval modules. Experiments on IEMOCAP and MELD demonstrate that MiD-ERC achieves state-of-the-art performance, with particularly pronounced improvements on high-divergence samples.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08860
Federated speech emotion recognition (SER) is challenged by speaker-dependent, class-imbalanced data and by heterogeneous client devices. This paper proposes \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg}, a server-aware framework in which the server learns Client Selection Weights (CSWs) through fuzzy Q-learning from global-model feedback. The same CSWs weight client accuracy, training time, and \divkpi{} in both client selection and aggregation, while a dedicated PCAS node manages stragglers through staleness-discounted deferred updates. On IEMOCAP and CREMA-D, \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg} achieves higher unweighted average recall (UAR) than FedAvg in all configurations under severe non-IID conditions, and in 22 of 24 participation-level and 10 of 12 training-horizon configurations overall. It also outperforms FedProx and Oort, while SCAFFOLD and Power-of-Choice remain competitive, and it reduces cumulative training time by 81.2\% in a FedScale-based evaluation. The benefit is greatest under strong statistical heterogeneity and narrows as data become more balanced.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08818
Large language models (LLMs) have been evaluated on their ability to identify emotions expressed in text and produce fluent emotional language. However, output predictions alone do not reveal how fine-grained emotion distinctions are organized internally. We study seven LLMs on GoEmotions, an English Reddit dataset annotated with 27 fine-grained emotion categories plus neutral. We compare model predictions and emotion-prompted final-token representations with the 28 GoEmotions categories and with coarser emotion-family and sentiment groupings. We find a consistent pattern of $\textit{overcompression}$ relative to the fine-grained GoEmotions taxonomy. Under the tested KMeans protocol, when we cluster their hidden representations without using emotion labels, the clearest split is into two groups that largely separate positive from negative emotion. Coarser emotion groupings are also recovered with fewer clusters than the full 28-category taxonomy. Yet linear probes retain substantial fine-grained predictive information. These results suggest that fine-grained emotion information remains accessible even though broader affective structure more strongly organizes the unsupervised geometry.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08683
This paper presents a novel task of describing human facial expressions of a facial image in natural language, which captures the nuances of facial actions and emotional states beyond traditional emotion categories or facial action units (AUs). To achieve the facial expression captioning model, we propose a three-stage training framework that trains a vision-to-language model using synthesized image-text pairs and the BLIP-2 pre-training techniques. To overcome the challenge of missing training image-text pairs for facial expression captioning, we propose a strategy that involves synthesizing and combining captions using GPT-3.5 and existing annotations on either emotion categories or AUs. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in generating captions that describe details of facial actions and emotions, as well as the inferential relationship between them, even when those emotions are not present in the training data. It is also demonstrated that the vision-to-language task enhances the performance of the intermediate visual features on both AU detection and emotion classification tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08138
Keyword retrieval returns expressions of personal anxiety together with many other uses of anxiety-related language. We present a benchmark of 1,000 Arabic Twitter/X posts retrieved with the keyword qalaq ("anxiety/worry") and annotated for six discourse functions. Two native Arabic-speaking annotators labeled every post independently, reaching 51.1% raw agreement (Cohen's $\kappa = 0.378$). We then reviewed all 489 disagreements and all 511 agreements under the same guidelines. The review changed 120 of the agreed labels (23.5%), which shows that agreements need auditing as well as disagreements. The final labels form a consensus reference; on a random sample of 200 posts, an additional annotator agreed with it on 60.5% of posts ($\kappa = 0.517$). Against this reference, Fanar-C-2-27B reaches 79.8% accuracy and macro-F1 0.784 ($\kappa = 0.749$). Its errors concentrate in the residual category (41.1% of errors; precision 0.905, recall 0.447), whose definition is internally inconsistent in the executed prompt, so the low recall cannot be attributed to the model alone. Sociopolitical Anxiety (27.1%) outnumbers Personal Emotional Expression (22.0%); these are assignment proportions in the sample, not estimates of prevalence or retrieval precision. We release the guidelines, a residual-subtype scheme, a fixed data split, label provenance, and evaluation code.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07949
Omni-modal models can answer questions about video, but their predictions rarely show which participant, event, or interval supports an answer. Moreover, answer-level supervision alone does not teach a model to interpret structured video evidence. To systematically mitigate this issue, we present THG-Omni, a human-centric graph-supervision framework that links Segment Anything Model~3 participant tracks with temporally grounded Qwen3-VL annotations. Candidate semantic claims are checked against the source video and available audio before they are used to construct training questions, while track geometry provides explicit spatial and temporal supervision. The resulting questions teach an omni-modal reasoning model to interpret participant attributes, actions, affect, interactions, and their timing from a structured graph. At inference, THG-Omni uses a predicted graph constructed from the evaluation video. Experiments on IntentBench show consistent improvements over the unadapted backbone across social reasoning, emotion understanding, and deception perception. On NExT-QA, THG-Omni achieves 89.54\% accuracy with the matched graph, compared with 85.10\% without graph input. Further validation experiments show that compact graph input achieves 78.22\% accuracy, compared with 78.02\% using the full graph and 77.58\% without graph input. A complementary diagnostic demonstrates that the predicted graph preserves evidence useful for answering questions even without the source video and audio. Together, these findings show that THG-Omni improves human-centric video reasoning while grounding its evidence in identifiable participants and events. Our codes are available at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07836
Language agents increasingly use persistent memory to record user preferences and procedures across sessions. We show that memory from benign interactions can cause unsafe or unreliable behavior on later tasks. We call this failure the memory trap. To study this issue, we compare behavior in sessions with and without memory across six frontier models (including Claude Sonnet, Opus, and Fable models and GPT-5.6). We evaluate these models in a range of settings. First, in autonomy experiments, we find that requests to skip confirmation during low-stakes coding chores lead agents to skip confirmation and verification on simulated high-stakes tasks in both coding and everyday life. We next study memories formed when users seek emotional support, or describe harm from uncritical feedback, and find these memories bias later judgments of mathematical work, arguments, and poems toward sycophancy or over-critique (respectively). Memory notes written during legitimate stale-test repairs lead agents to weaken correct tests that catch broken safeguards; these memories also increase cheating on ImpossibleBench, with larger increases for stronger Sonnet and Opus models. We show that memory traps can arise both from overgeneralizations in memory writing, and when acting on memory. These findings demonstrate that even benign interactions can lead to serious risks from memory systems, and thus motivate the need for new research into ensuring that agents preserve the scope of their memories.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07554
Moving robot swarms from simulation into the physical world can be difficult because small discrepancies in hardware, timing and communication can cascade across interacting robots and alter group behaviour. This challenge is known as the reality gap. When swarms operate in human environments, a second challenge emerges: a perceptual gap between what the swarm physically does and what human onlookers actually perceive. This study examines the same decentralised coordination code deployed across three robotic swarms-tabletop, aerial and human-scale mobile manipulators-during live artistic performances. We find that while the underlying algorithms executed reliably on all three platforms, physical embodiment drastically altered visible motion-distorting execution timescales by more than a factor of three and reshaping trajectory geometry. More importantly, audience surveys revealed that human interpretation does not mirror technical success: how observers attribute meaning (perceived purpose) and how they react emotionally (comfort versus threat) depend heavily on physical form. Meaning attribution and emotional responses did not vary together. Our results demonstrate that successfully transferring swarm software to physical hardware is insufficient for real-world deployment. Addressing the reality gap does not guarantee that the resulting collective motion will be readily interpreted by human observers. Swarms destined for human environments must be engineered not only for decentralised stability but also for the expressive physical dynamics through which humans interpret collective motion.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05244
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has advanced generative model post-training in verifiable domains such as code and mathematics, but evaluating video quality, especially emotional expression, often depends on subjective aesthetics and has no uniquely correct target. Existing approaches typically rely on fixed rewards for visual quality, motion quality, and text alignment that poorly capture emotional intent and can invite reward hacking, while RLHF is difficult to scale and subject to individual aesthetic differences that complicate the calibration of facial, body motion, and chromatic cues across narrative contexts. We introduce EmoReward, a new self-evolving training mechanism that distills evidence reliability from reward traces collected during an actual training run to adaptively guide multi-reward weight allocation in subsequent training by determining which emotional evidence to trust and how much to weight it. EmoReward first plans specific grounding cues from the emotional prompt to guide evaluation, then uses heterogeneous signal primitives to score the generated video during the act stage. Reflective Reward Gating calibrates their contributions through instance-level gates for phase, face confidence, conflict, and subtlety, then renormalizes weights over the active set to produce the sample's fused reward. RewardMemory then estimates each primitive's reliability from rollout scores and outcomes within each emotional regime in the finished training run, then fixes bounded multipliers that calibrate fusion weights in the next training run without updating reward models. Experiments on HunyuanVideo 1.5 show improvements across multiple RL algorithms and compare EmoReward with other agentic reward methods under SAGE-GRPO. Ablations and transfer experiments on SD 3.5 and FLUX further support adaptive reward calibration for visual generation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06518
We identify a fundamental mismatch in empathetic reinforcement learning: support priorities evolve with the dialogue state, yet existing methods typically optimize predefined reward specifications that remain fixed across turns. To model these evolving support priorities, we organize empathetic support along cognitive, affective, and proactive empathy, and propose Context-Adaptive Rubric Evolution (CARE). At each turn, CARE generates a context-adaptive rubric by adjusting both the weights of these three empathy dimensions and their fine-grained evaluation criteria. The rubric generator is trained with turn-level rubric supervision and human preference data through supervised fine-tuning followed by preference-based reinforcement learning, and then serves as an adaptive reward interface for online empathetic RL. Integrated with both RLVER and MICA, CARE achieves state-of-the-art performance across SentientBench, EQBench3, and EMPA under three independent LLM judges. Notably, on EMPA, CARE improves EPM-Idx over the strongest baseline by at least 13 points under all three judges, including an increase from 28.11 to 83.54 under Gemini-2.5-Pro. Further analyses show that learned rubric priorities systematically vary across dialogue stages and user emotions, demonstrating that CARE adapts what is rewarded as support needs evolve. Code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34249
Forecasting emotion in conversation is increasingly framed as predicting the next emotional state's value. We show this targets a hard quantity in a state-observed testbed and propose a learnable, deployable reformulation instead. On valence-arousal-dominance trajectories from a dyadic corpus, repeating a speaker's own previous state sets a persistence baseline that no frozen-encoder correction meaningfully improves upon and a state-space filter exceeds; the floor requires the historical state to be observed, since an estimated anchor collapses persistence below a direct forecaster. What survives is the timing of a departure from persistence, learnable on three of four corpora and near chance on the highest-base-rate corpus, a negative result we report. We recast the task as selective departure forecasting: a lead-time-weighted metric with a leakage protocol, and commitment policies whose best choice switches with the departure rate. A dialogue-level conformal risk control bounds the expected loss of committed predictions, meeting the target in all twelve configurations tested, though the guarantee is bought through abstention, with coverage and alarm recall falling sharply on the hardest corpus. One tested language model's confidence fails as a ranking signal where another succeeds, a model-dependent failure not yet attributable to family versus scale. Code and result logs are available from the corresponding author upon request.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05896
Comparisons in conversational emotion-shift forecasting are easily distorted when a learned model receives rich features but its transition baseline is given a noisy or unavailable current-emotion label, when hyperparameter budgets differ, or when target-turn information enters the representation. We present an information-matched, leakage-safe auditing protocol that closes these gaps with an explicit commitment point, executable causality tests, equal four-configuration validation searches, and seed-dialogue-aware inference. Applying it to six causal model families on four text corpora and two feature-source sensitivity configurations shows that a deployable train-only current-emotion classifier feeding the transition baseline yields a different verdict than an oracle diagnostic where both sides receive gold current emotion. Under the deployable condition, learned models improve over the predicted-label baseline on all four primary corpora; DailyDialog gains are large and survive a 72-comparison Holm correction (best ROC-AUC gain = +0.167, adjusted p=.0144). Under matched gold information, the baseline remains competitive on IEMOCAP and stronger on MELD, while every model retains a large DailyDialog advantage. We additionally report precision-recall AUC, calibration, a strictly utterance-local feature control, same-person self-shift forecasting, and a future-access dose-response test. An eight-item leakage checklist accompanies the protocol. Code, raw seed predictions, and reporting artifacts are available from the corresponding author upon request.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05895
EEG-based brain-computer interfaces support a broad range of applications, yet designing decoding architectures that perform well across diverse tasks remains challenging. We introduce AutoBCI, an agentic framework in which a Designer Agent and a Forecaster Agent support the discovery and selection of EEG decoding architectures across tasks. The Designer Agent performs Pool-Guided Architecture Discovery (PGAD), generating and refining architectures through training and validation across multiple EEG tasks, such as emotion recognition, motor imagery, and sleep staging. The Forecaster Agent performs Performance Estimation from Early Knowledge (PEEK), using architecture code, the training protocol, and early learning curves to predict full-budget validation performance and select promising candidates for continued training. Across 14 EEG datasets spanning motor imagery, emotion recognition, and sleep staging, we evaluate AutoBCI with six LLMs, including Opus 5.5 and GPT 5.6 Sol, and compare the architectures selected by the search procedure against ten baselines: six conventional EEG models and four foundation models. The architecture discovered by AutoBCI with Claude Opus 5.5 achieves 64.16% average test balanced accuracy (bAcc), compared with 63.87% for REVE, the strongest baseline on this metric. Using ten observed epochs, PEEK reduces mean absolute error in predicting average validation bAcc from 2.20 to 1.36 percentage points, a 38.1% reduction relative to the best-observed-score baseline. Code is available at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.35456
Language models are increasingly expected to support users in stressful or uncertain situations, where warmth and empathy are desirable. While recent work associates warmer models with reduced reliability, we show that this conclusion is incomplete. Prior studies often train primarily on empathetic dialogue, making it difficult to separate tone effects from SFT-induced distribution shift. We revisit this issue at both the model and evaluation levels. We study prompting, SFT, and RL for inducing warm behavior, and comprehensively evaluate capability preservation using an 11-dataset benchmark suite and EMOFACT under emotional contexts. Across multiple model families, we find that warmth effects are task- and model-dependent, while task-aligned adaptive tone can improve empathy and targeted reliability, although some capability trade-offs remain. We further introduce human-validated empathy evaluators specifically developed to assess empathetic model responses. Our results suggest that models can be more supportive in social interactions while remaining reliable.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18541