Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) produces rich training experience, yet outcome rewards reduce each attempt to a single number and leave most of this information unused. Training-time scaffolds, such as strategies or hints added to the prompt during training, offer a natural way to turn this information into guidance, but their design and adaptation are largely left to humans and tailored to specific domains. We introduce AutoScaffold, a unified AI-for-AI framework that turns a student's training experience into adaptive scaffolds, with minimal domain-specific information and no human intervention during training. A frozen teacher periodically examines this experience, diagnoses bottlenecks, and designs scaffolds in two forms: (i) strategies shared across a class of tasks and (ii) hints for individual hard tasks, adjusting the content and amount of support as the student learns. The scaffolds are removed at evaluation. We apply the same framework to ALFWorld, search-based QA, mathematical reasoning, and GPU kernel generation. When evaluated without scaffolds, students trained with AutoScaffold outperform those trained with the corresponding RL baselines in all four domains, with gains of 7.2 points in ALFWorld success and 4.0 points in average QA exact match. On GPU kernel generation, AutoScaffold increases the fraction of tasks with a correct kernel that runs faster than the PyTorch reference by up to 5.0 points. On math, our student surpasses QuestA's reported accuracy using approximately one-third as many student training steps. Analyses show that the teacher identifies a different failure in each task class and shifts its scaffolds from step-by-step workflows to targeted fixes as the student improves, and that its revised scaffolds help the student learn more than keeping the previous scaffold or using no scaffold.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14515
Hardware executions of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) are often validated by comparing the device's mean cost with a simulation, a check that can miss what matters for optimization. Under global depolarization, the mean normalized gap and the floor-corrected probability of every set of bitstrings, the optimum included, retain the same fraction of their noiseless improvement over uniform sampling. We test this prediction with depth-2, transferred-angle QAOA circuits for binary subproblems of an alternating-direction decomposition on the IBM Heron processor \texttt{ibm\_marrakesh}, with and without dynamical decoupling and twirling. At 12 qubits, the main-family circuits retained 29\% to 46\% of their mean-gap improvement but only 5\% to 15\% of their probability of the optimum, lower on at least nine of ten instances per run. Near-optimal bitstrings were lost about as much as the optimum, whereas the avoidance of poor bitstrings was retained best. In the first submission, a device-matched noise model reproduced the pattern but overestimated the retention of the optimum five- to eightfold. On a rugged planted family, the device found the optimum in 62\% of 768-shot blocks (noiseless: 98\%), within the range of local heuristics. Validations of optimization circuits should report retention of the optimum and of near-optimal sets.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10529
Visual Question Answering (VQA) imposes substantial computational overhead on vision-language models (VLMs), motivating model-agnostic input reduction methods that can be readily applied across diverse VLMs, including in black-box settings. Simply enforcing a visual-token cap reduces computation, but it can discard information needed to answer the question. A single reduction strategy also struggles to accommodate different scenarios. Our key observation is that cropping and compression are complementary: cropping highlights small targets and local details, whereas whole-image compression better preserves context for large targets or distributed evidence. Based on this observation, we propose C$^2$-Routing, which adaptively selects cropping or compression according to the input image and question. Since both strategies may still discard key information, we further design a safety gate that uses the predicted joint correctness distribution under original and reduced inputs to guide fallback and protect accuracy. To accommodate consumer GPU resource constraints, all training and evaluation experiments run on RTX 3090 GPUs. To measure gains beyond token capping, we use full-image baselines with the same cap of 1,024 visual tokens. We conduct extensive evaluation on three VLMs and 18 datasets spanning local details, global scenes, scene text, and documents. With the visual budget already capped, C$^2$-Routing further reduces end-to-end FLOPs by 36.53% and visual tokens by 42.36% on average, with a mean relative task-score decrease of only 0.77%.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14469
Users often complain that AI assistants such as ChatGPT are getting worse. Some versions do change, but human evaluation leaves a second possibility untested: the people judging may change. We separate the two on Chatbot Arena, a public platform where people compare answers from two anonymous large language models (LLMs) and pick the better one or say both are bad. We study 1,260,967 blind votes cast from May 2023 to August 2024 on pairs of models whose versions are fixed: dated vendor snapshots and models with fixed open weights. For the same pair of unchanged models, the share of votes saying "both are bad" rises by 1.71 percentage points a month on a mean of 17.1%, and by 1.91 points a month in 2024. In fourteen pairs observed often in both 2023 and 2024, it rose in every one, from 15.5% to 23.3%. The ranking does not trend: in 2024, the stronger model's share of decisive votes is flat. The rise holds within the same voter and on the same pair, and across arrival cohorts from their first recorded vote. It holds with prompt controls, in every major language, for dated vendor snapshots, open-weight models and models with stable answer length, and between interface changes. The drift is shared across models: month effects estimated from other models' pairs remove it from each model's own pairs. Platform-wide, the average model would be expected to score 78% against the 2023 average, yet the share of "both are bad" votes ended near where it began. The pattern fits a standard that follows the category's progress, so a product that stands still is judged as declining. Absolute verdicts on AI drifted while relative comparisons held steady, an evaluation drift that matters for LLM leaderboards and for the human feedback used to train models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14333
Understanding the progress of an activity requires tracking how the objects involved change over time. Object state readout provides this information by describing a target object's states and transitions across video frames. Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) generate detailed visual descriptions, these descriptions may leave the attributes needed to distinguish successive states insufficiently specified. In this paper, we propose look-ahead state readout (LASER), an anticipation-guided agent for object state readout that uses possible next-step changes to determine which attributes to inspect in the present. Given temporally ordered frames and a target object, LASER converts anticipated changes into targeted visual questions and inspects the current frame to establish attribute values. It then checks state readouts and forecasts against independent observations of subsequent frames, refining a state record used to generate the final description. Reusable textual observation skills guide this process and are refined by tracing discrepancies with reference captions to the responsible instructions. Candidate revisions are selected on separate videos based on improved caption quality without increased contradictions with reference facts. Model parameters remain frozen throughout adaptation and inference, and the revised skills remain fixed during evaluation. Experiment results and further analysis on OSCaR and PLM RCap show consistent improvements of LASER over strong baselines and existing approaches, which demonstrates the effectiveness of our approach.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14113
Fine-grained visual perception requires Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to locate and interpret subtle evidence within complex scenes. Constructing supervision for this ability is challenging: questions must have correct, unambiguous answers that depend on actual fine-grained visual details rather than coarse cues or language priors. Verifying these properties makes manual annotation labor-intensive and automatic generation difficult for models that themselves struggle with fine-grained perception. Yet the same models can often recognize such details once the region is zoomed in. We exploit this global-to-zoom perception gap and introduce ZoomGain, a data construction pipeline that constructs questions about the full image from visual information gained only by zooming in. It verifies each answer on the zoomed view with multiple models, ensures that each question remains unambiguous in the full image and cannot be answered from language priors, and specifically generates high-quality distractors for multiple-choice questions. With this pipeline and human-only screening (no manual QA editing), we build ZoomGainBench, a 1,000-question bilingual benchmark on which the best of 28 VLMs achieves only 61.08. Failure analysis reveals that models favor a particular type of distractor when answering multiple-choice questions incorrectly. Beyond evaluation, training on just 9K ZoomGain samples substantially improves the visual perception capabilities of our 4B/9B models, enabling them to outperform several hundred-billion-parameter models across various perception benchmarks. The trained 9B model achieves SoTA performance on several benchmarks, such as 90.25 on HR-Bench 4K. These results establish global-to-zoom perception gaps as a practical basis for scaling fine-grained visual supervision for both evaluation and training. Our code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14076
Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby. A small language model on a phone can be helpful in such situations, but its advice needs to be safe and accurate. We built HandsOnAid, a 4-bit Gemma 2B model fine-tuned with QLoRA on FirstAidQA dataset, a corpus of 5,550 first-aid question-answer pairs. We compared seven configurations, including the base, 4-bit and 8-bit fine-tuned models, and versions with a length floor, safety gate, or retrieval. We used a 41-pair question-answer bank with medically reviewed references that followed ANZCOR guidelines, and a strict 0-5 score rubric, with twelve safety overrides. Four frontier LLM judges (GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM-5.3) blindly scored every answer, with 45 hidden controls used to check judge reliability. Fine-tuning improved the mean score by +1.08 over the base model to 2.34. The best configuration scored 2.51 out of 5 which was the fine-tuned 4-bit model with retrieval. A medical professional also conducted a blind evaluation of 40 answers across the base, the 4-bit fine-tuned, and the retrieval configurations, and the scores were similar to the LLM judges' average scores. A keyword audit found limited coverage of several details of ANZCOR guidelines in the training corpus, that are required by the rubric, which suggests that missing information in the training data could be a cause of the low scores. On a smartphone device (Pixel 7 Pro) with six CPU threads and no network connection, the 4-bit fine-tuned model produced its first displayable text in 6.86 seconds and a complete answer in 14.88 seconds on average over ten questions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14059
Reusing key--value (KV) caches across language model updates could avoid repeated computation of shared context, but changes in model weights raise a fundamental question about what these caches preserve. We investigate direct cache reuse across four model updates, with a detailed study of DeepSeek-V4-Flash to Flash-0731. Our central finding is that caches can retain useful task information without faithfully reproducing the updated model's behavior. Retrieval accuracy varies substantially across updates, ranging from near-native performance to large losses. With source caches already available, reuse achieves median time-to-first-token speedups of $2.10$--$5.08\times$ on three longer-prefix QA benchmarks. To characterize the behavioral differences behind these outcomes, we introduce Functional Cache Divergence, which compares next-token distributions under reused and native caches. Direct KV cache reuse better preserves native model behavior in natural-text continuation, whereas compatibility degrades with increasing prefix length in single-token retrieval tasks. Answer-margin analyses help explain how correct retrieval decisions survive substantial internal state changes. Yet even agreement on the first generated token does not ensure agreement in answer content or stopping behavior. These findings establish task utility and fidelity to native inference as distinct criteria for evaluating cross-version KV cache reuse.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14051
Answering spatial questions about multi-source scenes requires a model both to identify each sound and to locate it. Existing spatial audio-language models obtain spatial information from a dedicated encoder, which separates spatial and semantic processing into distinct feature spaces. We study whether a general-audio codec trained without spatial supervision can serve both purposes. A controlled layer-wise analysis shows that the frozen codec retains spatial information, with lateral cues carried by the difference between the two ear channels. This information, however, is not readily accessible: in dual-source scenes, a model trained on these features predicts left/right at chance and, on the remaining axes, assigns the detected direction to the queried and the non-queried source equally often. We attribute this failure to an audio--text information asymmetry, in which the audio contains both sources while the answer describes only the queried one. A controlled $2\times2$ experiment shows that either completing the scene description or exposing the inter-channel difference lifts left/right accuracy above chance, whereas binding directions to the queried source requires both. Building on these findings, AURA keeps the codec and the language model frozen and exceeds the strongest dedicated system on SpatialSoundQA by 10.31 points in dual-source direction accuracy, with about 40\% of its trainable parameters.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13687
Uncertainty estimation has been a long-standing challenge in AI models; it amounts to "knowing what you don't know," and metacognition is notoriously difficult even for humans (cf. the Dunning-Kruger effect). Although it is still far from solved even in simpler classification systems, tackling it in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is becoming increasingly important. Within MLLMs, uncertainty can stem from any of the diverse sources as well as from their relationships, and further can stem from the unbounded answers in the open-ended setting. To tackle the issues, we propose CoMet, an MLLM uncertainty estimation method by decomposing uncertainty into a context-specific term and a multiplicity-specific term. The former captures ambiguity induced by the given context (e.g., task or prompt), while the latter captures how many plausible answers determined by the context remain compatible with the given input. We train a lightweight post-hoc uncertainty module to estimate these quantities, which enables efficient uncertainty estimation without autoregressive answer generation or repeated sampling. Experiments on various open-ended multimodal benchmarks, hallucination detection, and multiple-choice visual question answering benchmarks show that CoMet consistently improves uncertainty estimation over existing baselines while remaining efficient in practice. Code is available at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.32012
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) inherit strong textual reasoning capabilities from their language backbones and text pretraining, but often fail to apply the same level of competency to visual inputs. We show that this degradation cannot be attributed to only perception failures, by evaluating models on semantically-equivalent text and rendered-text image inputs: models can accurately read text in the images and recover near-text performance when provided their own transcriptions, but just cannot reason well on the images directly. We characterize this discrepancy as a modality reasoning-access gap, where models fail to route perceived visual content into existing reasoning machinery accessible with text. To bridge this, we propose TIGER (Text-to-Image Gap-targeted training for Enhanced Reasoning), which first mines synthetic modality counterfactuals where a model succeeds on a text problem but fails when provided the corresponding rendered image, and post-trains the model on the image input via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), along with SFT and DPO variants. Importantly, although trained exclusively on synthetic rendered-text images with no multimodal annotations, TIGER results in model performance improvements across diverse real-world visual benchmarks including geometric diagrams (MathVerse), multi-disciplinary sciences (EMMA, MMMU), complex charts (ChartQAPro), and embodied spatial reasoning (RoboSpatial-Home). TIGER also complements existing state-of-the-art RLVR visual reasoning methods, yielding further performance gains. Analysis involving reasoning-subspace activation and activation patching provide support indicating that TIGER helps to align visual-to-reasoning pathways toward text reasoning states. Our implementation is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.10552
The key-value (KV) cache dominates memory capacity and bandwidth in long-context LLM serving. While 4-bit microscaling formats (NVFP4, MXFP4) shrink the cache and run attention on FP4 Tensor Cores, a fundamental gap remains between algorithmic quantization and system-aware acceleration: existing FP4 KV systems use vanilla quantization that causes severe accuracy drops, whereas accuracy-oriented 4-bit algorithms rely on vector codebooks whose lookup overhead degrades decoding throughput. We present BitDecoding-FP4, an algorithm--system co-design for accurate and efficient native FP4 KV decoding. We mitigate three error sources: Dual-Residual Query Quantization splits queries into two FP4 tensors, cutting query logit error from 60% to 1%; Underflow-Aware Probability Scaling prevents E4M3 scales from rounding long-context probabilities to zero; and Outlier-Aware Key Quantization combines static smoothing, Hadamard rotation, and scale search to suppress key outliers under token-wise scaling. At the system level, we remove the softmax bottleneck via transposed softmax with fused probability quantization and stacked query MMA on paged KV caches. Across dense and MoE models with GQA and MLA, BitDecoding-FP4 stays within 0.5 points of BF16 KV accuracy with NVFP4 (1 point with MXFP4), and tracks BF16 KV in RL training rollouts. In end-to-end serving on NVIDIA B300 with Qwen3-4B and Qwen3-30B-A3B, it delivers 2.4-3.0$\times$ higher peak serving throughput than BF16 KV. The implementation is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09825
3D spatial reasoning from video remains challenging for VLMs because videos provide sequential, view-local observations rather than persistent metric scene records. Many questions must be answered in a query-specified perspective rather than the observed camera viewpoint, and prompting with a fixed set of RGB views may miss sparse or occluded visual cues. To address these gaps, we introduce BEV3SR, a training-free and backbone-agnostic framework for RGB-D videos with camera parameters. BEV3SR turns video observations into queryable metric bird's-eye-view (BEV) scene memory and formalizes each query into an evidence-aware spatial task. The Spatial Task Formalizer specifies the query's reference frame, spatial constraints, objective, and evidence requirement. The evidence requirement determines the appropriate reasoning pathway. A query treated as requiring geometric evidence is handled by the Geometric Reasoner, which deterministically computes the answer using the metric BEV records in the query-specified reference frame. Otherwise, a query treated as requiring visual evidence is passed to the Visual Evidence Aligner, which uses BEV-indexed object records and their associated supporting views to retrieve object-consistent and scene-context RGB frames for VLM grounding. Within a standard 16-frame budget, BEV3SR consistently improves different VLM backbones across multiple 3D scene QA benchmarks, delivering large gains on spatially intensive questions and significant improvements on open-ended scene QA. These results demonstrate that BEV3SR offers an effective, efficient, and interpretable framework for explicit 3D spatial reasoning from video.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09816
We study when and how multimodal input improves knowledge graph question answering (KGQA) in large vision--language models. Using a controlled evaluation over 1,500 WebQSP and CWQ questions and six VLMs within a fixed KGQA pipeline, we compare text-only prompting against text-plus-graph visualization at the per-question level and analyze performance changes as a function of reasoning complexity, model size, and image layout. Adding a graph image yields an average gain of 1.85 F1 points, driven by strong precision improvements on low-complexity questions (+4.65 F1). Mixed-effects and regression analyses show that these multimodal gains do not depend strongly on model scale, but are highly sensitive to graph layout: image-only settings sharply degrade performance, hierarchical Graphviz layouts outperform less organized renderings, and decomposing large subgraphs into separated paths yields the largest improvements. Taken together, the results indicate that visual prompting primarily aids KGQA by enhancing prediction precision in low-complexity contexts, provided that visual design respects cognitive and perceptual constraints. To optimize both accuracy and inference efficiency, we argue for adaptive visual prompting policies that selectively append diagrams to small, visually sparse subgraphs with well-structured layouts, avoiding unnecessary visual clutter and token overhead on complex queries. We conclude by relating these findings to a visual notation design theory, outlining how principled diagram encoding can guide future multimodal VLM prompting.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12938
Large language models have expanded beyond text to vision, audio, and other modalities, but understanding raw electromagnetic (EM) signals remains challenging. Wideband recordings can contain millions of samples, whereas existing waveform-based EM models are primarily evaluated on short in-phase and quadrature (IQ) segments, leaving long-recording understanding and detailed description insufficiently explored. We introduce LEMMO, a large EM model for instruction-driven recognition and description of long raw IQ recordings. LEMMO combines a linear-attention EM encoder with anti-aliased temporal resampling to process up to eight million complex samples. Its EM-text interaction module conditions learnable queries on instructions before retrieving signal evidence. Compact queries support recognition, while structured queries with auxiliary factual supervision organize scene-level properties, signal attributes, and cross-signal relationships for detailed description. We also construct and release a unified 1.38-TB corpus of real-world and synthetic EM signals, including LEMMO-ShortQA and LEMMO-LongDesc. Compared with MERLIN-LoRA, LEMMO improves mean EM-Bench perception accuracy by 15.77 %, mean strategy-generation ROUGE-L F1 by 4.38 points, and mean LEMMO-ShortQA accuracy by 14.31 %. It also improves categorical and numerical fact F1 on both LEMMO-LongDesc tasks while preserving its language backbone's MMLU performance. Our code and datasets are available at this https URL and this https URL, respectively.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09476
Text-to-image diffusion models often fail to suppress explicitly negated concepts, such as a lamp for "a desk without a lamp." We introduce T2I-NSI, a benchmark and metric for measuring negation sensitivity in text-to-image generation. It pairs each negated prompt with a canonical positive counterpart and factorizes negation by linguistic form (lexical/semantic, morphological, syntactic) and target type (objects, attributes, relations, compositions, and nested cases). The benchmark contains 759,869 paired prompt atoms over a 5,082-object catalog, with 916,272 images (911,982 open-weights, 4,290 closed-source), scored by a Basic CLIP estimator and a Robust ensemble of CLIP, VQA and open-vocabulary detection. Negation sensitivity is low: open-weights generators score NSI <= 0.038, while GPT-Image-1.5 and Gemini-2.5-Flash-Image reach about 0.09. The dominant failure is under-suppression rather than misdirection. Inverse interpretation is essentially absent (0.00% across over 450K atom-model evaluations), whereas models render the concept under both prompts on 8-19% of atoms and only partly suppress it on a further 9-25%; most remaining atoms are too weakly rendered to label. A blinded human study (420 atoms, nine annotators) corroborates the near-absence of inversion and the high persistence rate, and a matched-prompt comparison shows the open-versus-closed gap (~3.5x) is not a prompt-generator artifact. Code and data: this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09304
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show great potential in natural image understanding. Yet, they perform well, mainly on reasoning in-view contents within the image frame. This paper presents the first study on out-of-view (OOV) understanding, i.e., the ability to reason about objects, activities, and scenes beyond the visible frame of a perspective view. Our technical contributions are threefold. First, we design OpenView, a four-stage pipeline that leverages panoramic imagery for large-scale and diverse multi-choice VQA synthesis, where full-scene coverage enables flexible view framing while preserving global scene awareness. Second, we curate OpenView-Dataset, a high-quality synthetic dataset from diverse real-world panoramas to empower MLLMs upon supervised fine-tuning. Third, we build OpenView-Bench, a benchmark that jointly measures choice and rationale accuracy for interpretable and diagnosable evaluation. Experimental results show that despite having a large gap from human performance in OOV VQA answer selection, multiple MLLMs, upon empowered by OpenView, can consistently boost their performance, uplifted from 48.3% to 62.3% on average. Code, benchmark, and data are available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.18563
Quantization-aware training (QAT) is the most reliable way to obtain accurate low-bit large language models (LLMs), but training with AdamW keeps two dense FP32 states for every weight matrix. We find that low-rank memory-efficient optimizers such as GaLore and LDAdam degrade substantially in QAT. A considerable part of the QAT momentum lies outside its top-r singular subspace, and projection-based methods discard this part at every step. We further observe that this residual remains useful when only its sign is kept. Based on these observations, we propose ResQAdam. It keeps a single BF16 momentum, applies Adam only to the r x r coordinates of the principal subspace, and adds a normalized sign update computed from the residual. We evaluate ResQAdam with two from-scratch QAT methods and three QAT fine-tuning pipelines, with weights quantized down to 2 bits. It reduces optimizer-state memory by 71% to 74% relative to AdamW, stays close to AdamW in most settings, and lowers training throughput by less than 2%.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08924
Ultra-high-resolution (UHR) remote sensing imagery provides rich spatial details but poses challenges for accurate and efficient multimodal understanding. Existing evidence acquisition methods selectively explore relevant image regions, yet largely rely on generative multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for intermediate search control. However, reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) primarily aligns these models with human-preferred responses rather than explicitly optimizing region-level relevance judgments, while repeated autoregressive decoding introduces additional computational overhead. To address these limitations, we propose GeoJeV, a training-free method that formulates evidence acquisition as spatial probability-driven decision making. At each evaluated region, a frozen JeV model produces a probability distribution over candidate regions. Specifically, Region Rank prioritizes candidate regions, Sparse Branch adaptively determines branching width through sparse probability support, and Depth Gate controls refinement depth based on branch sparsity and distribution concentration. By coordinating search priority, branching width, and refinement depth through a shared distribution, GeoJeV reduces reliance on RLHF-aligned generation and eliminates intermediate decoding. Experiments on LRS-GRO, MME-RealWorld-RS, and LRS-VQA achieve accuracies of 60.59%, 52.79%, and 34.32%, respectively. Across the three benchmarks, GeoJeV improves the average accuracy of Qwen3-VL-8B by +5.32pp with only 1.12 additional seconds per question, while achieving a 7.8-fold inference speedup over the recent method.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08879
No-reference image quality assessment (IQA) of low-dose CT predicts the score that radiologists would assign to a slice without a full-dose reference, as needed to compare dose protocols and denoisers. Trained CT IQA networks agree well with radiologists but output only a score, whereas multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can explain a score but perform poorly on CT when only prompted. We propose a measurement-aware MLLM, built on Qwen3.8-27B, that rates a slice from its image together with six image-domain measurements of noise, sharpness, high-frequency content and streaks, given to the language model as percentiles in text. On the LDCT-IQA 2023 test set, it reaches an Overall score of 2.735, on par with the retrained challenge winner (2.735) and MedSigLIP-FiLM (2.713), and substantially above its base MLLM used as a zero-shot agent. Shuffling the measurements at test time reduces the score by 0.048, mostly through noise, but the same measurements also lead the model to assign higher scores to over-smoothed denoised images.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08754