Paper Reading AI Learner

Route-Time Conflict Maps for Cooperative End-to-End Autonomous Driving

2026-11-10 03:05:47
Haohua Que, Mingkai Liu, Tianle Zhu, Zhipeng Bao, Yiping Li, Handong Yao

Abstract

Existing cooperative end-to-end driving works at Class A (status-sharing) of the SAE J3216 classes of cooperative driving automation (CDA): vehicles exchange what they perceive, not what they intend, so each plans alone when to go, which limits cooperation and leads to deadlock when both vehicles yield or to collisions when both go. We present When2Go, a cooperative end-to-end driving system that learns when to go by sharing intent under CDA Class B or higher. Each vehicle broadcasts its LiDAR detections with forecast motion as instance tokens, together with its plan and intended trajectory. The receiver draws the fused detections, forecasts and partner plans into a route-time conflict map, the occupancy along its route over the planning horizon, on which a planner scores candidate speed profiles. Where two intended trajectories conflict, an order gate, a precedence network distilled from a right-of-way rule, decides who goes first; both vehicles evaluate it on the same messages and so reach the same order. When2Go imitates the rule-based expert of V2Xverse, which sees the simulator's ground truth; stops that When2Go cannot observe within its 2 s planning horizon are relabelled, so that it does not learn to wait without an observable cause. For our runs only, the benchmarks' PID controller steers by When2Go's waypoints instead of the route, and its forced push of long-waiting vehicles is off. With one model, When2Go sets the state of the art on three closed-loop CARLA benchmarks: 97.8 and 90.7 driving score on InterDrive without and with traffic (best published 90.1 and 78.9), 70.0 on the public V2Xverse protocol (best of sixteen rerun methods 59.1) and 88.2 on MDrive (best rerun 85.1), with 95.0% of its vehicles collision-free (87.7%).

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13494

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.13494.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot