Foundation models pretrained on large natural-image collections are increasingly adapted for medical image segmentation, in the expectation that they will replace models trained for each task. Most comparisons, however, use data from the training distribution and a single task-specific baseline whose configuration is rarely justified, and therefore provide limited evidence of performance at new clinical sites. It also remains unclear how much of a foundation model must be adapted, and what determines this. We adapted a foundation model, DINOv2, with strategies ranging from tuning only its bias terms to full fine-tuning, and compared it with U-Nets and ResU-Nets trained from scratch. Experiments covered colonoscopy, breast ultrasound and dermoscopy, with testing on held-out data from the training source and on independent datasets from other institutions. The adapted foundation model generalised better on every external dataset. Within the training distribution, the task-specific models remained competitive when training data were abundant, and delineated boundaries more precisely, while the foundation model more often missed small lesions. Only a small fraction of the foundation model required adaptation, and the capacity needed was determined by the imaging domain rather than by the adaptation method. A widely used polyp test set was also found to duplicate images from another benchmark. Foundation-model adaptation is therefore warranted where models must work across sites, with capacity selected on the target domain.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14519
DeepLearning (DL)-based Computer-Aided Diagnostic (CAD) systems have shown great promise in supporting clinicians, but their performance heavily depends on the availability of large, well-annotated datasets. In medical lesion detection, the scarcity of comprehensive, stan dardized annotations and the heterogeneity of existing datasets limit the development of robust foundation models. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to building a multi-domain foundation model for le sion detection by integrating diverse medical image datasets annotated for both anatomical structures and abnormalities. We first propose a student-teacher training strategy to effectively combine datasets with heterogeneous label spaces, mitigating catastrophic forgetting, and im proving feature learning. In addition, building on our previously pro posed example-based EM-DETR framework, we adapt it to jointly learn from multiple domain-specific datasets, enabling fine-grained, example driven detection across modalities. Our model achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) results, with image-level AUC scores exceeding previous SOTA by 1% point on four key findings in CXRs. We achieve a leading mAP50 in CXRs and mammography, surpassing EM-DETR trained on a single dataset by 2-3% points. This approach paves the way for scalable foundation models in medical imaging that leverage heterogeneous data while maintaining robust and generalizable performance.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14518
Many scientific and policy decisions require estimating the total number of target objects across a large image collection. Exhaustive human labeling is often infeasible, while raw model predictions can be biased, especially under domain shift. Recent human-AI estimation methods combine imperfect model predictions with limited human verification to obtain reliable collection-level estimates. However, existing work provides little guidance on how practitioners should choose among models, estimators, and adaptation strategies for a new deployment. We study these choices within a common human-in-the-loop counting framework across 12 tasks spanning biomedical microscopy, ground-level and aerial wildlife surveys, and overhead imagery of urban structures. Our results show that modern multimodal models provide a strong, training-free starting point for many tasks, while fine-tuned detectors become more advantageous at larger labeling budgets and across repeated deployments. Estimation efficiency improves further when model predictions are used to prioritize which units humans label, rather than sampling uniformly. We also find that each model's ranking quality can be estimated with a small pilot set, yielding practical guidance for selecting strategies on new counting tasks. In a field deployment on aerial pronghorn surveys, a task-specific adaptation of these methods meets the survey's $\pm 5\%$ tolerance after reviewing a median of only $3.2\%$ of collected images.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14380
Retrieval-augmented systems often retrieve passages that are accurate and relevant but state the answer at a coarser level of granularity than the question requires. For example, a question may ask which specific disease a drug treats (familial hyperlipidemia), while the retrieved passage mentions the broader disease family (hyperlipidemia). Prior work on context sufficiency treats such coarse passages simply as insufficient. We argue that they form a distinct case, which we call resolvable insufficiency: text alone cannot settle the fine-grained answer, but the broader category it mentions maps to a short list of candidate answers in a domain ontology. When language models read these coarse, family-only passages, they exhibit a phenomenon we call Clade (Category-Level Answering from Deficient Evidence): they answer instead of abstaining or searching further. On biomedical questions from PrimeKG, family-only passages reduce abstention by 13.8 points compared to uninformative passages, and the resulting guesses are wrong about half the time. A counterfactual test confirms the cause: replacing an exact disease name with its broader family name lowers abstention by 17.4 points compared to deleting the sentence. Simple fixes like confidence filtering, scaling to a larger model, and explicitly instructing the model to abstain cannot resolve Clade, and this replicates on ecological species interactions in GloBI. Finally, we test whether an ontology can turn coarse passages into exact answers. Given the correct family, an ontology list includes the true answer in 98.5% of cases, but string matching finds that family on the page for only 19.8%. Letting the model choose the family raises this to 30.0% and end-to-end recovery from 10.0% to 26.8%. Overall, our results show when language models should stop guessing and consult an ontology, and highlight which steps of that process remain unsolved.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14355
Emergencies can occur where there is no phone signal and no ambulance nearby. A small language model on a phone can be helpful in such situations, but its advice needs to be safe and accurate. We built HandsOnAid, a 4-bit Gemma 2B model fine-tuned with QLoRA on FirstAidQA dataset, a corpus of 5,550 first-aid question-answer pairs. We compared seven configurations, including the base, 4-bit and 8-bit fine-tuned models, and versions with a length floor, safety gate, or retrieval. We used a 41-pair question-answer bank with medically reviewed references that followed ANZCOR guidelines, and a strict 0-5 score rubric, with twelve safety overrides. Four frontier LLM judges (GPT-5.6 Sol, Claude Opus 5, DeepSeek V4 Pro, GLM-5.3) blindly scored every answer, with 45 hidden controls used to check judge reliability. Fine-tuning improved the mean score by +1.08 over the base model to 2.34. The best configuration scored 2.51 out of 5 which was the fine-tuned 4-bit model with retrieval. A medical professional also conducted a blind evaluation of 40 answers across the base, the 4-bit fine-tuned, and the retrieval configurations, and the scores were similar to the LLM judges' average scores. A keyword audit found limited coverage of several details of ANZCOR guidelines in the training corpus, that are required by the rubric, which suggests that missing information in the training data could be a cause of the low scores. On a smartphone device (Pixel 7 Pro) with six CPU threads and no network connection, the 4-bit fine-tuned model produced its first displayable text in 6.86 seconds and a complete answer in 14.88 seconds on average over ten questions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14059
Text-guided segmentation models receive an image and a short caption about the lesion, and on public benchmarks the caption improves accuracy considerably. On colonoscopy and breast ultrasound, however, the size, count and location words of each caption were computed from the mask that later scores the prediction, and the chest X-ray captions were written by benchmark annotators. We tested what two published models take from them. On colonoscopy and chest X-ray, it is mostly the lesion's extent. Keeping only the size word or the lung-zone phrase recovers 84 to 98 percent of the improvement over an empty caption, and removing it loses 52 to 77 percent. The rest matters little, and a polyp called a rock is segmented just as well. We call this extent leakage. On breast ultrasound, nearly half the captions also name the diagnosis, which carries part of the benefit. Retraining on three datasets shows that models pick up this habit from their training captions, though only partly on breast ultrasound, and that it weakens their segmentation from the image alone. The leak can be measured without training a model, since caption words alone predict lesion area (coefficient of determination 0.54 to 0.77 on six of seven test sets). Without the test mask, the best method we tested, which estimates extent from the image, reaches 74.59 Dice on colonoscopy against the published 77.23. We propose an evaluation protocol that keeps what a caption says about the image apart from what it copies from the label.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13970
Molecular property prediction is fundamental to computational chemistry and drug formulation research, yet existing benchmarks remain fragmented across datasets, properties, and evaluation protocols, limiting systematic evaluation of model generalization. We introduce Chem World, a large-scale benchmark integrating 17 public datasets with over 800,000 molecular and chemical-system instances across 10 property tracks, covering single-molecule and multi-component systems, including drug solubility. Chem World provides a unified testbed for evaluating molecular representations and compositional modeling across diverse chemical properties. Building on the benchmark, we propose PACM (Physics-Aware Compositional Modeling), which combines molecular representations with composition-aware modeling and domain-specific physical constraints. Extensive experiments show that molecular language models provide strong and transferable representations, while PACM consistently improves prediction across diverse chemical systems. Chem World and our PACM-powered drug-property prediction Agent support generalizable chemical modeling and offer a foundation for AI-assisted biomedical research and drug formulation development.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13945
In open-world recognition, machine learning models not only make predictions on unknown structures ("generalized open-set"), but also continually learn and improve from those predictions over time. Interactive segmentation, despite its access to user feedback, has so far remained confined to the open-set setting. In this work we introduce MEOW, the first framework that turns non-interactive segmentation backbones into interactive open-world learners without updating learnable model parameters. MEOW combines parameter-free transductive reasoning with memory consolidation to accumulate knowledge and thereby improve future performance. Focusing on medical data, we show that MEOW consistently improves its own predictions on classes never seen during training, and transfers zero-shot to unfamiliar domains, including micro-CT data and other imaging modalities.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13935
Objective: Concept-based interpretation has emerged as a promising approach for explaining blackbox models using human-understandable, high-level concepts. However, most existing methods require annotated concept labels to train the model to identify concepts in the input, and obtaining such annotations in clinical text is often expensive. This study aims to enable concept-based interpretation for language models without concept supervision on clinical prediction tasks. Methods: We propose a novel framework that enables concept-based interpretation without concept supervision through a tailored cross-attention bottleneck. Clinical text and the text descriptions of medical concepts are first tokenized and embedded by a pretrained language model. A cross-attention module then estimates the presence of each concept for each text token, producing concept relevance scores that capture how concepts are involved throughout the note. These scores are pooled and used in a linear prediction layer to model clinical outcomes in an interpretable manner. Results: The performance of the proposed framework was compared against blackbox models across two tasks: chest trauma severity stratification using a private dataset and an in-hospital mortality prediction task using the publicly available MIMIC-III dataset. The proposed framework achieved AUROC values within 0.02 of the corresponding blackbox models. The framework also enabled cohort- and patient-level interpretation, capturing the overall concept importance across the cohort and patient-specific concept contributions. Conclusion: Our proposed framework realizes concept-based interpretation without requiring ground-truth concept presence labels. It improves the transparency of clinical text predictions while maintaining strong performance in clinical prediction tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13564
Benchmark scores for medical large language models (LLMs) are difficult to interpret when scoring criteria cannot be traced to clinical evidence. Here we developed Med Evidence Bench (MEB; this https URL), comprising 1,536 physician-constructed items across three levels: guideline knowledge, standardized clinical scenarios and real-world laboratory scenarios. Each criterion stating a medical claim is linked to a versioned source-text span. Across ten LLMs, the Evidence Trace Score (ETS) was 0.975-0.997 for guideline knowledge, 0.292-0.658 for standardized scenarios and 0.182-0.447 for real-world scenarios, and rankings varied across levels. For real-world scenarios, scores for identifying clinical information (mean, 0.770) exceeded those for matching evidence (0.165) or formulating recommendations (0.160). On 1,296 criterion-level judgments, automated grading agreed with the majority vote of three physicians (macro-F1, 0.930; 95% confidence interval, 0.915-0.945), although agreement was lower for evidence application. These findings from Chinese-language materials indicate that guideline recall does not ensure patient-specific evidence use and do not establish clinical effectiveness.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13562
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated considerable potential in biomedical applications, while agentic memory systems have emerged as a promising approach to preserving and utilizing information across tasks and interactions. However, a fundamental question remains: how effectively and reliably do these systems retain, retrieve, update, and utilize biomedical information? In this study, we systematically investigate agentic memory in the biomedical domain, focusing on task effectiveness, retrieval quality, information fidelity, and long-term robustness. We evaluate five memory approaches across four LLMs in three representative settings: biomedical knowledge reasoning, clinical prediction, and long-term conversational memory. Our analyses reveal how memory construction, evidence relevance, and conversational history shape downstream biomedical performance, highlighting the distinct challenges of retrieving relevant information, preserving its fidelity, and effectively utilizing it for reasoning. Building on these findings, we introduce Hybrid Memory Retrieval and Utilization (HMRU), a training-free framework that jointly enhances evidence accessibility and task-aware utilization to improve biomedical reasoning and long-term conversational memory. HMRU achieves an average relative improvement of 8.6% across biomedical question-answering and conversational memory benchmarks, with additional gains in selected clinical prediction tasks. It further reduces conversational answer errors by 24.9% and closes 48.0% of the performance gap to full-context inference. Our findings provide a systematic characterization of biomedical agentic memory and practical insights into developing more effective and reliable memory-augmented LLM systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13426
As AI agents increasingly perform tasks autonomously across sectors, including healthcare and biomedical research, understanding how their behaviors develop and influence outcomes over time becomes increasingly important. Existing evaluations largely focus on model capabilities and performance on predefined tasks. Here, we propose an epidemiologic cohort design for studying agentic AI, drawing on principles established in human population studies. The framework treats individual agents as members of a cohort, their underlying model as genetic makeup, accumulated work as their time scale, and naturally occurring behaviors as exposures that may influence subsequent outcomes. By following agents longitudinally, this approach enables investigation of behavioral determinants of adverse events, estimation of their potential preventable burden under causal assumptions, and characterization of behavioral changes over an agent's work life. We illustrate the design through two prospective observational cohorts examining curiosity and probing as a safety question, and data checking and analytical accuracy as a reliability question. Together, the framework and illustrative studies provide a generalizable blueprint for designing epidemiologic cohorts of AI agents.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13333
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) remains a pressing public health challenge worldwide. Targeting limited HIV prevention and treatment resources effectively with network-based algorithms is a long-standing problem with a rich history at AAMAS and other computational venues. However, optimizing targeted biomedical interventions for minimizing spread of HIV often requires observability of the contact network of HIV transmission risk behavior among individuals, which is prohibitively expensive to collect at scale. Peer referral networks, i.e., networks collected through a recursive peer referral process, are an alternative network class often used to study HIV in hidden populations that can be collected digitally at scale, but they deviate from the underlying contact network: referrals can follow non-risk social ties and participants accept only one referral, hiding contacts among already-recruited individuals. In this work, we first formalize the novel problem of planning network-based interventions to minimize HIV spread in the hidden contact network while observing only the peer referral network. Second, we implement R2C-Agent, a decision making agent for interventions that is designed around our new conditional graph diffusion model called Referral-to-Contact Diffusion (R2C-Diff). R2C-Diff positions the peer referral process as incremental corruption of the underlying contact network and learns to reverse it. R2C-Agent plans its interventions over contact networks sampled from R2C-Diff, so its decisions account for uncertainty about the hidden contact network. Finally, we conduct simulated experiments using real-world HIV network data that demonstrate that R2C-Agent empirically plans more effective interventions than baselines from interdisciplinary literature and highlight key tradeoffs and assumptions driving performance.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13312
The rapid advancement of foundation models has transformed computer vision, yet their adaptation to medical imaging, particularly purpose built foundation models for spatio temporal echocardiography videos, remains limited. In this work, we explore the feasibility of fine tuning a pretrained foundation model for video (TimeSformer) for automated diagnosis of reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF) from apical four chamber videos. The model is finetuned on the publicly available RVENet A4C dataset with a phase aware clip generation strategy that captures complementary systolic and diastolic dynamics. We employ divided space time attention, layer wise learning rate decay, and multi clip inference to enhance robustness under limited data. Experimental results show that full fine tuning of the proposed model outperforms classifier only tuning and a 3D CNN baseline. These findings highlight the potential of leveraging foundation video models for echocardiography based heart failure diagnosis and motivates further domain adaptation studies in medical imaging.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13297
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly studied for clinical decision support, and medical question answering provides a testbed for evaluating this capability. In particular, medical multiple-choice questions (MCQs) reflect a core challenge in clinical decision-making: plausible options often share overlapping evidence, while only a few decisive factors distinguish the correct option from incorrect ones. However, existing retrieval-based and reasoning-oriented methods mainly focus on supplying broadly relevant knowledge or eliciting reasoning paths, rather than identifying the compact differential evidence that separates confusing alternatives. In this work, we present a retrieval-grounded differential evidence framework for medical MCQs. Our method extracts option-specific pieces of differential evidence and organizes them into concise evidence prompts for answer selection. This design better aligns external knowledge with differential reasoning while reducing irrelevant context. Experiments show consistent accuracy gains across multiple datasets and target LLMs. Ablation studies further show that our framework outperforms both directly using retrieved evidence chunks and closed-source LLM-generated general hints, and that its improvements are not solely explained by answer-proximal guidance, but are consistent with differential evidence serving as a compact aid for reasoning over competing alternatives. Our findings also offer insights for medical reasoning and other decision-making settings with multiple possible choices.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13233
Reliable medical laboratory automation requires robots to complete entire workflows in protocol order while handling changes during execution. A robot may execute each motion correctly yet fail the workflow by confusing visually similar stages or stalling after human intervention. We present Robo-MLT, a dual-system framework that couples explicit workflow monitoring with learned action generation. A vision--language planner composes an ordered atomic-skill sequence from the protocol and the initial workspace observation. A multiframe execution monitor detects when the active skill has completed or become infeasible, then advances the workflow or triggers replanning. A skill-conditioned vision--language--action policy generates the manipulation trajectories, and an asynchronous runtime coordinates it with the monitor. We evaluate Robo-MLT against four policy baselines and a VLM-based monitor baseline on blood gas analysis and blood sample tube sorting, with 50 nominal configurations per method and 20 sample-removal configurations. Robo-MLT achieves task success rates of 82\% and 70\%, exceeding $\pi_{0.5}$ by 30 and 22 percentage points, respectively. After an operator removes the sample being handled, the system revises the remaining plan and continues processing the other samples. These results indicate that, under the evaluated conditions, explicit workflow monitoring makes long-horizon laboratory manipulation more reliable and recoverable.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13039
Medical vision-language models (VLMs) often report a finding because the question names it; standard benchmarks miss this. From public segmentation datasets we build counterfactual views without manual annotation: the lesion erased by inpainting, a same-shape control edit elsewhere, and unedited lesion-free images. The evidence sensitivity gap (ESG) is the rate of absent-or-refer answers after erasure minus the rate after the control edit; it is zero for a model that ignores the image or reacts to both edits alike. MedScope-4B (Qwen3.5-4B, LoRA, image tools) was trained on label-derived trajectories, selected by a pre-registered rule and tested once against nine frontier and six open VLMs; four pre-registered checks then probed the mechanism. On 507 internal cases across five imaging types, MedScope-4B reached ESG 0.758 and claimed an erased lesion in 9.6% of cases, against 0.27-0.47 and 41-62% for the frontier models (all p<0.001), without significant loss of accuracy on real lesions. Without counterfactual views ESG fell to 0.279+-0.107 (three seeds); the effect replicated on MedGemma 1.5 4B and two unseen inpainting tools. At four external centres the advantage held but frontier models detected more real lesions; on a fresh external test MedScope-4B detected 0 of 48 pneumothorax films, with net utility below gemini-4-argon's (-0.36 [-0.50, -0.23]). Matching the control edit was not shown to matter; over three seeds no fresh-external ESG advantage over removal-based DPO was established; a paired-view consistency objective did not beat a matched-compute control, while that continuation alone cut erased-lesion claims on unseen tools at every seed, at a cost in sensitivity at one. Training on erased and edited images gives a small model an evidence-gated disposition that prompting does not give frontier models; it does not improve perception, and rare critical findings need coverage.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13006
Rubric-based reinforcement learning (RL) extends RL with verifiable rewards to open-ended tasks by scoring each response against query-specific rubrics. Under group-relative optimization, however, a rubric that every sampled response fails (unreachable) or passes (saturated) gives all responses the same outcome and no learning signal; in Qwen3-4B medical training, 60.88% of query-rubric observations are inactive. We find that the two states lack different supervision: stating an unreachable rubric in the prompt raises its satisfaction from 1.13% to 91.25%, whereas responses that all pass a saturated rubric still differ in quality. We therefore propose RuACT (Rubrics as Adaptive Critics and Teachers), which assigns each inactive rubric the role that supplies what it lacks. Rubric as Teacher uses unreachable rubrics as privileged information for reward-gated on-policy self-distillation, and Rubric as Critic decomposes saturated rubrics into child rubrics that separate current responses while sharing the parent's weight. RuACT outperforms GRPO, rubric reweighting, and rubric-guided exploration on all four medical and scientific benchmarks with Qwen3-4B and achieves the best average with Qwen3-1.7B. On initially unreachable rubrics, unguided recovery rises from 35.02% to 42.86%, while child refinement improves reward-quality alignment on independent rollouts from 57.74% to 60.77%. Code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09597
The 2026 ImageCLEFmedical GANs Task Exploring Fingerprint Detection, Privacy Leakage, and Synthetic Medical Image Generation continues to investigate privacy and security concerns around using patient data to generate synthetic medical images, now in its fourth edition. This edition introduces three complementary subtasks: the first extends prior editions by asking participants to detect which real images were used in training a Generative Adversarial Network to produce given synthetic outputs; the second is a novel subtask requiring participants to identify which latent vector produced each synthetic image, probing the faithfulness and reversibility of the latent-to-image mapping; the third asks participants to generate privacy-preserving CT slices, quantifying the trade-off between image fidelity and patient privacy. Ground-truth annotations and benchmark datasets of real and GAN-generated lung CT slices are provided for all subtasks. Evaluation is based on Cohen's Kappa for Subtask 1, matching accuracy for Subtask 2, and a combination of FID and Privacy Preservation Score (PPS) for Subtask 3. Overall, 37 teams registered for the task, with 10 teams submitting runs across subtasks and 6 teams submitting working notes papers. This paper presents an overview of the task setup, datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarises the approaches and results of participating teams.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09455
While feed-forward segmentation networks perform well on large cohorts, they degrade in constrained clinical settings with few training samples and imaging artifacts. Human vision, by contrast, remains robust under these conditions, a property partly attributed to the recurrent and feedback connectivity of the visual cortex, which refines visual information over time. Inspired by this, we append lightweight recurrent refinement blocks to segmentation backbones, namely Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), modern Hopfield networks and convolutional GRUs, and study their behaviour as the number of iterations increases at test time (including beyond the training horizon). Evaluated on two open-source datasets, Kvasir- SEG and ARCADE, our recurrent blocks add less than 1.5% parameters and yield gains on clean data (up to 1.4 pp) and under noise (up to 17 pp) while reducing HD95. Code is available at this https URL .
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09436