We study action-conditioned monitoring of autonomous-vehicle behavior in semantically unusual driving scenes. The target is whether the executed ego action is appropriate for the scene: the same scene can admit both normal and anomalous behavior, so visual unusualness alone does not determine the monitoring label. A Vision-Language Model (VLM) first predicts the scene-required action from an outcome-hidden video window; the monitor then compares that expectation with the realized ego-motion trajectory under an explicit compatibility rule. To study this monitoring task, we contribute a six-field taxonomy of 112 paired scenarios spanning both failure polarities (42 derived from documented incidents), a generated video corpus with estimated trajectories, and an exploratory two-stage monitor on that corpus. On 235 clips from 15 scenario families, the two-stage protocol with a fixed T-2.5 s window obtains 83.0% accuracy and anomaly recall 0.773, versus 74.5% and 0.536 for a single-stage video-only baseline; specificity is 0.880 versus 0.928.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07540
Speech communication plays a crucial role in the Internet of Things and autonomous networks. However, traditional communication systems suffer from insufficient semantic extraction and limited noise suppression capability. To address these issues, we propose a Speech enhancement-based Deep Semantic Autoencoder (S-DSA) communication system for wireless communications. It consists of a dual-branch semantic encoder, a channel encoder, a channel decoder, and two semantic decoders, enabling joint source-channel coding for robust transmission. A key novelty lies in an adaptive semantic noise decoupling mechanism that disentangles target speech semantics from noise representations through an interaction module, thus maintaining semantic consistency under low SNR conditions. Furthermore, a joint training strategy optimizes speech reconstruction and noise estimation, while a lightweight testing strategy reduces complexity by disabling the noise-decoding path. The proposed S-DSA enables more effective separation between speech and noise, and yields higher robustness as well as better reconstruction quality. These findings highlight the potential of the proposed S-DSA as a practical solution for next-generation intelligent wireless communications.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07361
Multi-perspective-camera systems are widely adopted since they provide broad visual coverage for autonomous driving, motivating the synthesis of a unified wide view from spatially separated observations. In this work, we formulate wide view synthesis (WVS), which aims to synthesize a geometrically consistent wide view at a specified virtual viewpoint from multiple perspective cameras. Unlike conventional image stitching, WVS requires reasoning about 3D geometry and visibility to handle depth-dependent parallax and occlusions arising from spatially separated camera centers. While vanilla 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) enables high-fidelity view synthesis, its reliance on per-scene optimization limits its applicability to driving scenes. Furthermore, WVS introduces additional challenges, *e.g.*, peripheral stretching under perspective projection and photometric inconsistencies across cameras. To address these challenges, we propose **Wide-View Gaussian Splatting (WV-GS)**, a feed-forward Gaussian-splatting framework that synthesizes wide views without per-scene optimization. Specifically, we introduce Piecewise Perspective Rendering (PPR) to mitigate peripheral stretching through local perspective projections sharing a common camera center, and Spatial Affine Photometric Modeling (SAPM) to account for camera-dependent photometric variations during training. We further introduce **WideDrive**, a synthetic benchmark providing dense ground-truth wide views and adapt a LiDAR-projected sparse-reference protocol to real-world datasets. Extensive experiments on multiple datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of WV-GS for WVS. Dataset and code will be publicly released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07081
Evolution has shaped intelligence for billions of years. Artificial intelligence (AI) now raises a striking possibility: intelligence may begin to direct its own evolution. As AI agents become capable of modifying and evaluating their own behavior, how quickly could they improve, and how can that improvement remain safe? We develop a theoretical framework comparing Darwinian, Lamarckian, and agent-directed evolution following environmental change. Darwinian evolution relies on natural selection, Lamarckian evolution adds inherited learning, and agent-directed evolution allows agents to generate and evaluate behavioral variants and choose how extensively to search. When learning is sufficiently effective, these mechanisms exhibit progressively faster adaptation. Generating more variants accelerates adaptation, while optimal search effort depends on learning ability, problem difficulty, and experimentation costs. However, an agent's ability to direct its improvement does not ensure that improvements are evaluated against the intended objective. When the evaluation target is misspecified, additional search accelerates convergence toward the wrong behavior, even as measured performance improves. In recursive self-improvement, such errors may persist across generations, posing challenges for AI safety. Independent evaluation and oversight must keep pace with autonomous AI development. The central challenge is not simply to accelerate the evolution of intelligence, but to preserve humanity's ability to guide its direction, limit its speed, and intervene when necessary.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07048
The policy that converts runtime estimates of an autonomous agent's condition into operational authority is rarely specified or measured. We empirically characterize the Trust Responsive Authorization Policy (TRAP), which maps an Authorization Readiness Score (ARS), a weighted combination of runtime trust, operational stability, and contextual risk, onto discrete authorization levels through an asymmetric rule: escalation requires consecutive observations above a band edge plus a margin, while a sharp drop in readiness restricts authority at once. On one matched set of 100 Monte Carlo traces, we compare TRAP with static, trust-only, risk-only, and symmetric policies. Under abrupt degradation, TRAP restricts at onset and re-escalates sooner after recovery than the symmetric policy, with the highest and, descriptively, least variable stability among the adaptive policies, although more of its post-recovery escalations occur below the selected trust threshold. Paired bootstrap intervals exclude zero for the remaining differences. In one-factor sweeps, recovery time rises with the escalation margin and run length, shifts with the score weights, and is unchanged by the restriction threshold. In an exploratory post-freeze experiment, when the same degradation is spread over 5-20 intervals, TRAP restricts only on the 4 traces that retain a single-interval drop above that threshold; averaged over all 100 traces, it holds authority above what readiness supports for 15.9-18.9 of the 20 degradation intervals, against 0.8 under abrupt degradation and about 10 for the symmetric policy. Its restriction advantage therefore depends on degradation being abrupt. All reported values are traceable to the publicly available, versioned research release.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06996
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have ushered in a new age of proof abundance, but helping humans understand these proofs requires new attention to the differences in how AI agents and humans pursue a proof-making task. We present "simulated collaboration", a methodology that allows us to examine two key questions: (1) the relative attention AI agents pay to surface syntax or, conversely, deeper underlying semantics, and (2) how and where AI agent preferences for what to do next diverge from human preferences. On a set of nine major human collaborations in Lean with 4.7M definitions across more than 6K commits, we find that, over the course of proof construction, AI agents (1) are far more strongly drawn than humans to explicitly marked gaps; (2) show a relative aversion to densely connected proof centers and to complex or surprising proof goals; and (3) are relatively attracted to surprising proof bodies, which they tend to regularize toward baseline. Our results highlight important blind spots and potential interventions for future human-AI collaboration in mathematics.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06995
Recursive self-improvement requires AI systems to improve the models and infrastructure used by subsequent systems. LLM compression offers a concrete efficiency objective: retain a pretrained model's behavior within a smaller model storage budget. We study whether coding agents can carry out this step autonomously. We formulate compression as a terminal task in which an agent receives a source checkpoint, storage limit, inference environment, and time budget, then constructs compressed weights and executable inference code. The agent controls its algorithm and experiments; perplexity feedback guides search, and independent verification checks the final model. Across six agents and six model--size settings, 29 of 36 submissions pass verification. Selecting the lowest-perplexity agent design per task yields an average 3.4% perplexity increase over BF16 and 77.33% downstream accuracy, compared with 79.56% for BF16. Recorded experiments reveal how agents achieve these outcomes and where improvement breaks down. Agents lower PPL in 21 of 24 revisions at nearly fixed storage; complete-model feedback reverses 17 of 79 prior local rankings; and generation and inference tests expose failures that likelihood alone misses. The results identify representation design, experimental judgment, and capability validation as central to agent-driven model compression, a measurable component of efficiency-oriented self-improvement.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06858
Generative video models are increasingly used as visual world simulators, yet their primary strength lies in rendering plausible pixels rather than reasoning about how a world should evolve. Coherent world evolution requires more than visual fidelity: when an event occurs, a model must infer its consequences for the entities in the world and then render the resulting state. For example, after a wild beast appears, the model should not only depict the wild beast, but also infer whether a nearby person should flee, take cover, or fight back based on the realized scene. Existing diffusion-based video models lack an explicit mechanism for maintaining world state and reasoning over such event-conditioned consequences, often producing visually plausible but behaviorally static or causally inconsistent outputs. To make this reasoning gap concrete and measurable, we propose a new problem, Out-of-Sight Causal Evolution, which requires a model to render an event, reason about its consequences for the evolving world state, and reveal a causally plausible outcome as the world continues to evolve, even out of sight. As a baseline reference solution, we introduce EvoWorld, a brain-renderer collaboration framework in which a vision-language model serves as the world brain: it observes generated segments, maintains an evolving account of the world, and reasons about plausible state transitions, while a segment-autoregressive video renderer realizes them visually. We further introduce EvoWorld-Data and EvoWorld-Bench for training and evaluating event realization, causal reactions, and revisit consistency. Experiments show that EvoWorld substantially improves event-conditioned causal evolution over recent models while preserving visual quality and consistency, establishing a reference point for reasoning-guided, autonomous world evolution beyond the current field of view.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06748
We present a shared framework that adapts Cosmos world foundation models for real-time interactive world simulation in Physical AI. By streaming visual observations in response to actions and scene controls, the framework enables users and embodied agents to interact with evolving virtual environments. It supports both predicting the visual consequences of actions and generating observations from physical state maintained by an external simulator. We demonstrate this approach across camera navigation and robot manipulation, controllable video transfer, and multi-view autonomous vehicle (AV) simulation. These examples provide a shared foundation for developing interactive virtual environments for Physical AI training and evaluation. Our code and model checkpoints are available at this https URL and this https URL. The project website is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06627
Online reinforcement learning offers an effective approach to precise laboratory manipulation, yet costly real-world demonstrations and limited access to dense process rewards hinder its practical application. We present TwinBridge, a digital twin-driven framework that supplies policy initialization and dense visual rewards for real-world online learning. We construct digital twins by combining 3D Gaussian splatting with physics simulation. Here, simulator states provide task events and geometric progress under physical prerequisites and ordering constraints, yielding rewards for policy pretraining with simulated demonstrations and reinforcement learning. We distill this supervision into a visual reward model. During real-world interaction, its predictions are combined with execution history to compute dense rewards for human-in-the-loop policy refinement. Across five real-world laboratory tasks, TwinBridge achieves a final mean autonomous success rate of 98% with at most 25 minutes of real-world interaction per task. Experiments show that dense rewards improve interaction efficiency over sparse rewards, and simulation-based policy initialization further accelerates learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06442
Improvement in enzyme engineering is usually pursued by optimising which candidates to assay within a fixed model and workflow; when the bottleneck arises from a mismatched method or a failing workflow, that route is difficult to escape. We present EnzymeRSI, a dual-loop system for recursive self-improvement (RSI). The outer loop evolves harness assets without changing model weights, the inner loop develops prediction and selection algorithms under controlled conditions, and a cloud laboratory system is specified to close the physical loop with quality-controlled feedback. By updating its prediction strategy through iterative comparison, the outer loop raised the mean development-set Spearman correlation on ProteinGym by 0.044 across five assays, reaching 0.335 on CD19 and 0.683 on OPSD (rhodopsin); of the two first places, only CD19 was produced by the outer loop itself. In the self-improvement of the ThermoMPNN algorithm the inner loop reached a PCC of 0.849, and on TadA-Bench it reached a Spearman correlation of 0.307 in 1.13 h. In three prospective wet-lab tests of the system's experimental decision-making, 10 of the 32 candidates that had not been pre-specified for the luciferase RLuc showed at least twice the wild-type activity; a recommended variant of the cytidine deaminase A3A raised 5mC conversion to 90.2%; and path selection in evolution raised the catalytic efficiency of the DNA polymerase KOD-E on a modified substrate to 31.1 times that of the parent. By treating the organisation of the research workflow and the development of algorithms as a single falsifiable dry-to-wet loop, this work offers an evolutionary paradigm for moving beyond the blind spots of a fixed method and for autonomous enzyme engineering.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06321
Humans naturally possess the ability to work persistently toward long-term goals. Given a challenging task, humans can continuously work for months or even years to accomplish a specific objective. In this paper, we propose Marathoner, an autonomous agentic model possessing the ability of ultra-long-horizon execution. Specifically, we propose a comprehensive post-training pipeline to instill this critical capability into base model. For Ultra-Long-Horizon Task Synthesis, we leverage major release PRs containing 1000+ lines of new code from diverse GitHub repositories as the primary source for synthesizing challenging task-level data. Additionally, we introduce Multi-Task Chaining, which chains multiple generated tasks into a single more challenging task, enabling the synthesis of tasks with frontier-level difficulty. For rejection sampling finetuning, we combine strong teacher model with diverse harnesses to generate trajectories on our synthesized tasks and conduct supervised finetuning on base model with rejection sampled trajectories. For reinforcement learning, cold-started model performs real-world execution through harnesses in independent sandboxes during rollout process, effectively facilitating the acquisition of genuine ultra-long-horizon execution capability. We further propose a novel reward strategy, Later Stage Bonus Reward, which explicitly encourages model to perform meaningful maneuvers during later stages of execution. Through extensive evaluation on 5 benchmarks containing ultra-long-horizon tasks, Marathoner achieves consistent and substantial performance improvements over base model and even surpasses performance of strong proprietary model. Further analysis shows that Marathoner can consistently work for 10+ hours and conduct 1000+ tool calls on highly challenging tasks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34378
With the rapid development of autonomous driving systems (ADSes), real-world roads are evolving into mixed-traffic environments where autonomous vehicles (AVs) and other traffic participants (e.g., human-driven vehicles (HDVs), cyclists, and pedestrians) coexist and interact with each other. However, current ADSes still incur various safety violations in mixed traffic scenarios, raising a strong demand for runtime safety assurance frameworks that can continuously monitor hazards and prevent potential violations. Existing ego-centric assurance approaches are insufficient for mixed traffic, where violations often arise from locally reasonable yet jointly incompatible decisions among multiple vehicles and cannot be reliably resolved through independent takeover. To bridge this gap, we propose CoSafe, a modular and ADS-agnostic cooperative runtime safety assurance framework for mixed-traffic autonomous driving to extend runtime safety assurance from ego-centric takeover to scene-level cooperative intervention. CoSafe leverages vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication to enable roadside units (RSUs) to monitor scene-level hazards and jointly mitigate hazards involving multiple vehicles. We integrate CoSafe with seven state-of-the-art ADSes, and our evaluation on the InterDrive benchmark demonstrates that CoSafe improves the driving score of AVs by 70.03% on average, reduces safety violations by 87.80%, and accurately identifies unsafe AVs with an F3 score of 0.930, while satisfying real-time constraints.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06204
Object detection research remains constrained by high annotation costs and the closed-set assumptions of supervised models, limiting scalability to novel categories. We present a target-dataset annotation-free object detection framework that eliminates the need for human labeling on the target dataset by leveraging the complementary strengths of pretrained foundation models, including segmentation and vision-language systems, combined with a self-refining training loop. To further reduce reliance on expensive LVLM queries, we introduce a landmark-based clustering mechanism that amortizes labeling across image clusters, improving label consistency while lowering computational cost. Our method autonomously generates segmentation proposals, assigns semantic labels through multimodal reasoning, and iteratively improves both localization and classification using a lightweight open-set detector. This modular pipeline enables adaptation to completely unseen object classes and domains without any human-provided target-dataset annotations, while maintaining compatibility with existing detection architectures. Evaluations on COCO, LVIS, ODinW-35, and Roboflow-100 demonstrate substantial performance gains over state-of-the-art open-vocabulary and long-tail detection methods, achieving 60.8 AP on COCO and 47.4 AP on LVIS under zero-shot settings. Beyond strong benchmark results, our approach provides a scalable foundation for real-world detection systems in unknown environments, where annotation is infeasible.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06195
Static and incomplete parametric knowledge limits the performance of multimodal large language models on novel-knowledge and knowledge-intensive tasks, especially those requiring multi-hop evidence acquisition. Existing multimodal agentic search methods often fix visual evidence at the input or a predefined trajectory position, making it difficult for agents to select search modalities as their information needs evolve and to handle complex real-world queries. We define this capability as autonomous cross-modal search: an agent chooses among direct reasoning, text-to-text search, text-to-image search, and reverse-image search, actively introduces visual evidence when appropriate, and switches between and integrates modalities across multiple hops. We propose ModalSearch-Pipeline, a scalable procedure for constructing an interleaved multimodal knowledge graph. It samples paths with diverse depths and modality compositions and uses backward question construction to obscure entity names and image targets that would expose reasoning shortcuts while retaining necessary disambiguating clues, yielding text-only, image-initialized, and arbitrarily interleaved multi-hop problems. We train the ModalSearcher Agent with supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning in a live Web environment, and construct ModalSearch-Bench. Experiments show that ModalSearcher-8B improves average accuracy by 16.2 points over Qwen3-VL-8B under the same agentic workflow across five multimodal knowledge-intensive QA benchmarks, with consistent gains on independently constructed active visual-search benchmarks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06131
Motorized Two-Wheelers (MTWs) dominate personal transport across much of the Global South, yet remain largely overlooked in predictive perception research for autonomous driving and ADAS. We introduce MotoVerse, a benchmark for predictive perception from an MTW's ego-centric perspective. MotoVerse comprises 949 maneuver clips collected in dense, unstructured traffic and trajectory annotations for over 31,000 surrounding road agents, including over 16,000 MTWs, enabling two complementary tasks: Ego-Rider Maneuver Anticipation (ERMA) and Traffic Agent Trajectory Prediction (TATP). Each clip is further annotated with an MTW-specific challenge taxonomy comprising dynamic ego-motion, weak traffic structure and contextual occlusion, enabling challenge-aware evaluation. We benchmark established conventional prediction models, general-purpose Vision-Language Models (VLMs), driving-specific VLMs and vision-language-action models. Our experiments reveal three key insights: (i) video backbones reach most of their full-observation accuracy from the first fifth of a maneuver, whereas zero-shot VLMs need most of the maneuver to be observed; (ii) zero-shot VLMs, whether general-purpose or driving-specific, largely remain close to simple baselines on both tasks; a preliminary LoRA study shows that adaptation lifts anticipation sharply but leaves trajectory prediction behind conventional models; and (iii) the rider's own motion drives forecasting difficulty: for every model, including a static baseline, errors are highest during left turns and rise under dynamic ego-motion. We believe MotoVerse will serve as a challenging benchmark for safer and more robust predictive AI for intelligent two-wheelers. The dataset and evaluation code are publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06007
Merging companies that each run Salesforce must consolidate their customer data into a single organization while both source systems remain in use. This requires reconciling different schemas and picklists, resolving duplicate customers across and within organizations, preserving relationships between records, and keeping the target current until cutover. This article proposes a reference framework for an autonomous extract-transform-load pipeline for this task. It combines partitioned bulk extraction, declarative mapping templates, rule-based and statistical quality gates, master data management with deterministic and blocked fuzzy matching, constrained loading with per-record error capture, and change data capture guarded by a data-health circuit breaker. Each stage is mapped to Jitterbit Integration Studio constructs. The framework was implemented as an open reference prototype and evaluated on synthetic two-organization scenarios with known ground truth at three scales, from 32,040 to 383,973 source records, over five random seeds. At a preset threshold, hybrid matching reached pairwise F1 scores of 0.918 for accounts and 0.885 for contacts; calibrating the threshold per object would raise these to 0.938 and 0.963. The quality gates prevented all load failures and all silent loss of unmapped picklist values without wrongly flagging any clean record, whereas removing them produced about 1,000 load failures per run. Over five simulated days of hourly incremental synchronization, replayed events were ignored, an injected upstream fault was contained in the batch in which it occurred, and the target agreed with a full rebuild on more than 99.3 percent of field values. Validation on a production deployment remains future work.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05918
Planning electricity systems requires repeated decisions that connect regional resources, investment, operation and network constraints. Here we present an autonomous planning framework that carries prepared regional scenarios through proposal, numerical evaluation, feedback interpretation, redesign and final plan selection. Agents propose investment bounds, storage operating conditions and feeder interventions, interpret numerical feedback, and decide how to revise designs and when to stop. The framework automatically executes annual investment-and-dispatch optimization and representative-feeder verification, applies fixed acceptance criteria and retains the lowest-cost accepted candidate. We evaluate forty carbon-constrained trajectories across ten system-year scenarios in five electricity systems and four countries, using two model deployments and single- and multi-agent architectures. All forty retain candidates satisfying the implemented physical and fixed annual operational carbon-budget checks. Twenty-eight of forty matched reference designs exceed the new scenario ceilings. A separate archive of ninety-six trajectories under a common 1,000 Mt annual ceiling provides matched references and broader regional coverage. The results demonstrate autonomous planning under explicit emissions constraints using public regional data and published institutional demand outlooks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05911
Intelligent production requires systems to make decisions and organize work according to production goals and operating conditions. It also requires continuous adjustment through feedback. This paper analyzes intelligence in human production organizations from a complex adaptive systems (CAS) perspective. The analysis identifies two coupled mechanisms: individual autonomy and collective coordination. Individual autonomy enables actors to form local decisions using available information. Collective coordination aligns these decisions with shared goals and joint constraints. Learning and adaptation improve both mechanisms over time. A production-system model formalizes how local decision rules and coordination jointly form system decisions. On this basis, we propose the Recursive Autonomous Agent (RAA) framework, which combines goal-driven autonomous agents with a recursive organizational structure. Goal contracts define local objectives and operating boundaries, while capability contracts support the selection and composition of production units. Common interfaces allow coordinated groups to participate as units in larger organizations, connecting equipment, production lines, and factories. RAA thus provides an engineering approach to next-generation intelligent manufacturing, translating the requirements of intelligence, openness, and system-wide integration into mechanisms for autonomous and coordinated production.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05828
Large language models (LLMs) have progressively evolved into the core of autonomous agents. Building on this progress, LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) coordinate multiple agents into a synergistic team to accomplish complex tasks that exceed the capabilities of individual agents. The effectiveness of such systems depends not only on the agents themselves, but also on how collaboration mechanisms are designed and organized. Note that real-world collaboration is typically partially observable, where each agent can only access partial information about the environment due to physical or privacy-related constraints. However, many existing multi-agent benchmarks assume global observability, and leave limited support for systematically evaluating collaboration mechanisms. To bridge this gap, we introduce MASBench, a multi-agent collaboration benchmark designed under partially observable constraints. It is organized into three progressive task categories: Reasoning, Scheduling, and Game. Through this structure, we progressively evaluate three representative collaboration mechanisms: Protocol, Memory, and Routing. MASBench further provides deterministic evaluation metrics, including performance score, communication cost, and cost effectiveness, to characterize both collaboration outcomes and communication overhead. Experiments across diverse LLM backbones and mechanism configurations offer empirical guidance for effective MAS design. Code is available at: this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04672