The widespread adoption of large language models (LLMs) is reshaping how textual content is produced, complicating text provenance, and raising concerns for misinformation, plagiarism, and intellectual property. While prior work on AI-generated text detection has progressed, one-dimensional human-AI co-authorship scores lack signals directly relevant to ``AI involvement''. It remains unclear how adversarial paraphrasing distorts detection signals. In this work, we formulate a discrete-class text provenance detection framework. This framework allows an abstraction of realistic co-authorship scenarios into distinct degrees of AI involvement, differentiating the AI polishing on the surface level from the AI updating the discourse structures. This framework reveals the mechanisms of how adversarial paraphrasing blurs the decision boundaries for co-authorship detectors. To improve robustness of the detectors, we augment training data with adversarial paraphrases generated by the state-of-the-art paraphrasing attack model, exposing detectors to challenging meaning-preserving rewrites. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets and generation models demonstrate that adversarial paraphrasing substantially degrades detectors trained only on benign data, while adversarial data augmentation leads to consistent robustness gains and good cross-generator transferability. Overall, our findings highlight the value of discrete-class formulation and principled data augmentation for building reliable detectors of human-AI co-authorship.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01427
Web agents and answer engines fetch pages at question time, and liveness checks of cited sources treat an HTTP 200 response as success. We measure how often that assumption fails and what it does to measurements built on fetched pages. We fetched 10,307 URLs in three days with a polite static client and a rendered browser client: pages from 1,507 sites in five strata, random non-existent paths on every site, and the 4,795 URLs cited by expert-verified claims in ExpertQA. We define a taxonomy of what a 200 response contains, label the static 200 responses automatically, and check the labels against 300 items reviewed by an LLM-based assistant; a human check of 60 of them retained every reviewed usability label after discussion. By the automatic labels, 20.9% of the pages that a static client receives with status 200 do not contain the page's main content: app shells, bot challenges, block pages, error and placeholder pages, and partial content. On the held-out test split, the reviewed sample lowers this estimate from 25.5% to 20.0%. 13.1% of the sites whose random-path probe was answered returned 200. The error propagates: for the cited sources, treating 200 as content overstates the share of claim-source pairs that can be checked against live content by 12.2 points and inflates the apparent silent citation-drift rate from 5.8% to 21.9%. Cheap heuristics catch most of it. Text length, probe comparison and redirect-to-root, combined and tuned on held-out sites, recover 86% of unusable reviewed responses at a false-alarm rate near 5%. Content-reading detectors perform comparably: the best, the text classifier, gains five to seven points of recall at more than twice the false-alarm rate. We argue that agents and their evaluations should report fetch outcomes explicitly instead of inferring them from the status line and will release the labelled data and code.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00884
KGW watermarks bias sampling to accumulate keyed detection evidence. We construct budgeted evasion through token-event evidence replacement using ordinary phrase rewrites. Our construction jointly selects compositions of LLM-proposed alternatives from an independent model and measures global token-edit distance on complete outputs. At the largest attainable cost within the budget, exact coverage search maximizes removal of original scored token pairs. It uses a known tokenizer without the key, detector feedback or queries to the watermarked model. Exact accounting separates source evidence removed, evidence created and length effects, with initial strength setting the required reduction. Separate signed-event analysis found that mean suppression arose mainly from removing watermark-enriched source events. In controlled, occurrence-counted, one-token-context KGW tests on short passages, 39 of 82 qualified, initially detected sources yielded rewrites with terminal detector score Z < 4 that passed blinded source-relative model review, at a mean actual token-edit cost of 16.0% under a 20% allowance. To examine whether this initial requirement can be inferred, a separate historical 95-passage study estimated initial detector score Z0 from generation traces with correlation 0.793 and an in-sample association beyond length. This aggregate information did not establish improved allocation, and the separate no-trace stopping test did not reliably exploit cheaper reviewed crossings in the candidate bank. Comparisons did not establish an advantage over simpler selection and ordinary constrained rewriting. The construction makes budgeted evidence replacement executable while exposing limits in signed reduction and recognition of sufficient editing.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00726
LLMs degrade in multi-turn conversation partly because of context pollution: the model's own earlier outputs stay in context and anchor later turns, so an early misreading of the user's intent can persist after the user corrects it. Assistant omission (AO), dropping every assistant message, removes this pollution but fails when interaction is referential: later turns refer back to drafts, decisions, and tool-call results that exist only in assistant turns. We propose Agentic Conversation Context Curation (AC3), a training-free method in which a separate analyzer (1) consolidates the task specification from the user's messages alone, (2) audits the assistant's prior outputs against it, and (3) edits the context, either appending the analysis or discarding the assistant side and rebuilding the context from the specification. A second finding: pollution is contagious. An analyzer that sees the assistant's reasoning while extracting the specification can do worse than no intervention, and instructing it to ignore them did not close the gap, so we exclude assistant turns structurally. On Lost in Conversation (replaying difficulty-selected instances), where AO is an oracle by construction, AC3 closes 55-84% of the gap between full context and AO on three of four tasks and exceeds AO on the fourth, and an LLM that faithfully summarizes the history does not reproduce the gain even with more compute. On real WildChat conversations, a GPT-5-mini judge prefers AC3's next turn over both full context and AO in every configuration of our main table, though this preference depends on the judge; on CollabLLM results are mixed. In stateful tool use (tau2-bench), AO collapses to 0% on every model; AC3 does not collapse, though it falls slightly behind full context. Detector studies show that Reset removes injected pollution but is not span-selective: the gain comes from rebuilding the specification.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00518
AI "humanizers" rewrite machine-generated text so that detectors classify it as human-written. Public leaderboards score evasion and embedding similarity, but not whether checkable details survive. We check whether numbers, dates, person and organization names, and quoted spans survive each rewrite, using a rule-based checker validated by two AI annotators (precision 0.84-1.00, recall 0.93-0.95; no human annotation). In the October 2026 cycle of a public humanizer leaderboard, all 11 commercial tools changed or dropped at least one of these units in 35-65% of the documents that contained one. Most changes were to quoted spans; counting numbers and names alone, 10 of the 11 tools still altered at least one in 20% or more of the documents. The September 2026 cycle was similar (19-50%). An open 12B humanizer kept at least 97% of numbers and names in fact-dense U.S. federal agency text, but reworded 67-78% of the quoted spans, against its own prompt. Unit retention and detector evasion were not clearly related across tools (Spearman rho = -0.46, 95% CI -0.65 to 0.08), and the open model's four released files (two of them quantization-aware low-bit files) did not show the pre-registered monotone trade-off. On federal texts with matched human, AI-styled and humanized versions, a general-purpose decision model, Jev, asked a single zero-shot question, separated human originals from humanized rewrites with AUROC 0.864 (0.827-0.902), 0.18-0.22 higher than Binoculars, Fast-DetectGPT and the adversarially trained RADAR, while calling 24% of the human originals AI at a 0.5 threshold. On the AI-styled rewrites by 2026 models, both perplexity-based detectors scored below chance (AUROC 0.37 and 0.39), also with line breaks removed. Hypotheses, data rules and analyses were frozen before the main runs; two earlier data contacts are disclosed. We release the checker and the per-item results.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00359
This paper presents TurnTurk-GPT, a text-based turn-taking predictor for Turkish obtained by fine-tuning a Turkish GPT-2 model with the TurnGPT objective on synthetic and real dialogue, and evaluates it on real Turkish conversation against rule baselines, a zero-shot Turkish language model and a widely used multilingual end-of-turn detector. Evaluation uses word-level decision points on unpunctuated, lower-cased text approximating the output of streaming speech recognisers, recording-disjoint and speaker-disjoint folds, nested threshold selection and paired cluster bootstrap tests. TurnTurk-GPT outperforms the multilingual detector under both recording-disjoint and speaker-disjoint evaluation. It outperforms the zero-shot language model only when the test speakers occur in training; on unseen speakers the two are statistically indistinguishable. Removing the suffixes of the turn-final word reduces AP by up to 44%, against 2% for a sentence-internal word, locating the Turkish end-of-turn cue in verb-final morphology. Synthetic dialogue alone yields the weakest trained model, and when a speaker pauses the zero-shot and multilingual baselines remain close to chance. The model and the evaluation protocol are publicly released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.42010
World-action models increasingly apply test-time scaling, spending extra inference computation on candidate selection and adaptive allocation to improve control. Such gains are credible only when candidates carry exploitable signal, nominal compute savings become real speedup, and evaluation stays reliable. We audit all three on Cosmos Policy and RoboCasa with a premise-first, pre-registered methodology. On clean data, a learned value selector is 1.66 pp worse than random; a hindsight oracle gains only 1.40 pp, with an episode-level interval spanning zero; and 82% of states show identical candidate outcomes, leaving little selection headroom. Token pruning cuts per-forward FLOPs by up to 47% but yields at most a measured 1.15$\times$ end-to-end speedup on the deployed path (1.25$\times$ on a decode-excluded path), short of a 1.5$\times$ target, and our adaptive-allocation experiment is inconclusive under a power gate. We further identify and fix a silent rendering corruption whose rate rises sharply along compute-heavy planning paths while leaving the official direct-policy result unaffected, and release a detector, fix, and scripts. These findings show why test-time scaling should be audited as a chain of premises (decision signal, realized efficiency, evaluationintegrity) rather than by success rate alone. Conclusions are scoped to the tested configuration.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41970
With the surge of machine vision applications, image compression for both machine and human vision (ICMH) has become an important research area. Existing studies mainly focus on task-specific adaptation or multi-task joint optimization, yet they often overlook the unequal contributions of different features and network layers to downstream machine vision tasks. To address this issue, we first quantitatively investigate the impact of different feature and network layers on machine vision performance, providing a principled understanding of their importance. Based on this analysis, an Importance Guided feature and network Dual Adaptation (IGDA) framework is developed for ICMH. It adopts implicit neural representation as the basic architecture and designs an efficient adaptation structure with both feature and network weight adaptation. An Importance-Guided Network Adaptation (IGNA) module is developed with a low-rank adaptation strategy to selectively adjust key network layers according to their importance in different tasks. An Importance-Guided Feature Adaptation (IGFA) module is developed with a low-rank and Kronecker product-based transform to explore the non-local property of the features in order to reduce the number of adaptation parameters. Extensive experiments on representative machine vision tasks, including image classification and object detection, demonstrate that our IGDA-ICMH framework achieves significantly better performance than the existing implicit neural representation-based methods for ICMH.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41924
Accurate BEV map prediction is a critical component of autonomous driving systems, enabling downstream planning and control. Recent approaches such as Mask2Map achieve strong performance by predicting vectorized, instance-level map elements directly from multi-view images. However, existing BEV map prediction models operate largely independently of object-level scene understanding, despite the fact that traffic participants frequently occlude or implicitly encode information about road geometry. In this work, we propose a multitask architecture that jointly predicts BEV maps and 3D objects, explicitly enabling information exchange between the two tasks. Building upon Mask2Map, we introduce an object detection branch and incorporate cross-task feature fusion at both the BEV feature level and the instance-query level via deformable attention and cross-attention mechanisms. This design allows map instances to leverage object context while remaining robust to occlusions caused by traffic participants. Experimental results on the nuScenes and Argoverse 2 datasets demonstrate that our approach consistently improves BEV map prediction accuracy, with particularly significant gains of 21% mAP in scenes containing heavy object occlusion.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41834
Robotic exploration can reduce human exposure to hazardous environments by autonomously searching unknown areas for objects of interest while constructing a complete, risk-aware map. However, existing autonomous exploration approaches typically prioritize geometric coverage or information gain, without explicitly coupling semantic object detection and the risk associated with operating near potentially hazardous objects. Moreover, many systems have been demonstrated primarily in simulation or controlled environments, leaving limited validation of risk-aware semantic exploration in complex, unstructured field settings. To address this gap, we propose SAFARI, a framework that treats object detection as a native channel of a unified probabilistic map, thereby jointly informing exploration and planning with both geometric and semantic evidence. We evaluated SAFARI in 11 missions across three field sites on a quadruped platform. The framework achieved an average coverage of 98.7% of the accessible mission area, without operator intervention for 97.6% of mission time, and detected objects with characteristic dimensions as small as 15cm. Lastly, through ablation studies and a detailed analysis of system behavior, we show that object-size awareness and safety-aware path planning are crucial for effective hazardous-object search.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41456
Recent advances in gigapixel-level imaging have brought High-Resolution Wide shots to the forefront of research. However, these images present significant challenges: extreme sparsity of foreground, gigapixel-level resolutions and interleaving of foreground and background. This causes traditional detectors and attention mechanisms to be hindered by background, resulting in inefficiency and inaccuracy. To tackle this problem, we propose BiHashFormer, a dual sparsified branch transformer built on hashing. RoI Selector will predict the foreground proportion for top-k selecting target-containing windows. The compression branch processes windows selected and refines attention into HashAttention by discarding half of the key-value pairs, reducing cost and improving efficiency. The compensation branch uses HashMiner to perform low-cost hash searches in the remaining regions, recovering features of missed objects. Experiments confirm that the selection relationship in HashAttention is one-way and reveal the preference of different queries for keys. In experiments on the gigapixel benchmark PANDA, BiHashFormer reduces 37.5% backbone FLOPs while improving AP50 to 81.0%. Moreover, this parallel dual-branch structure allows the model to avoid inference delays caused by inter-branch dependencies, while achieving much greater stability than single-branch models, specially with low rates of RoI selection.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39937
Camera--LiDAR perception on mobile robots and intelligent vehicles depends on reliable sensor geometry throughout deployment. Installation variations create uncertainty in the initial extrinsics, while changing observation quality makes frame-wise estimates fluctuate during operation. This paper presents CalibSwitch, an observation-driven framework that separates absolute extrinsic recovery from selective state maintenance. A cross-modal absolute extrinsic generator (CAEG) combines projection-free bidirectional feature interaction with geometry-regularized learning to recover complete SE(3) candidates from image--point observations and coarse view context, without a supplied numerical initial transform. A selective recurrent calibration policy (SRCP) combines observation quality and temporal history to determine when a candidate should replace the working geometry consumed by a frozen multimodal detector. On nuScenes, CAEG achieves mean translation and rotation errors of 0.248 m and 5.884$^\circ$. Under sustained geometric transitions, SRCP reaches a mean composite error of 1.46 with 9.70\% candidate commitments, outperforming quality-based and temporal-consistency gating at comparable commitment rates. Relative to unconditional per-frame updating, it improves frozen-detector mAP and NDS by 1.43 and 0.92 points. Paired geometry--observation uncertainty tests, two real-vehicle platforms, and 13.5-FPS single-camera Jetson execution demonstrate the system value of selective geometric-state maintenance for continuous perception.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41352
Transformer-based language models have achieved remarkable success in automated short answer grading (ASAG). However, current methods in ASAG struggle to comprehend, reason about and evaluate complex mathematical answers involving symbols and formulas. These score-only methods fail to generalize across diverse responses and skill states associated with identical scores. Moreover, they ignore the potential upward bias introduced by generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) usage in assessing students' performance and knowledge mastery. To address these limitations, we propose AICG (AI-aware Cognitive-supervised Grading), a two-branch multi-task framework. The first branch combines RoBERTa-based regression, ordinal, and classification heads for individual-answer grading. The second branch uses an expert-designed Q-matrix to associate responses with assessed skills and jointly predicts G-DINA-derived skill mastery and learning gain. Through the shared encoder, these skill-level targets provide cognitive supervision for answer grading beyond score labels. AICG further uses a Gen-AI detector, trained through supervised contrastive pretraining followed by linear classification, to estimate assistance probabilities and convert them into reliability weights, attenuating unreliable cognitive evidence during learning assessment. We conduct experiments on 49,402 instructor-graded responses spanning 19 academic semesters. Relative to RoBERTa regression, AICG reduces mean absolute error (MAE) by 50.3% and improves quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) from 0.798 to 0.927. Ablations identify Q-matrix-guided cognitive supervision as the primary source of improvement, while AI-aware weighting further reduces overall MAE by 4.2% over the unweighted cognitive model and consistently improves MAE and QWK across the four most recent post-Gen-AI semesters.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41215
RGB-thermal (RGB-T) object detectors combine visible and thermal imagery for robust detection, but signal corruption in either stream can substantially degrade accuracy. Restoration-based methods incur significant latency and do not consistently improve downstream accuracy, raising a more direct question: rather than restoring corrupted inputs, can we efficiently adapt the detector to their varying signal quality? Conventional PEFT offers an efficient route, but its input-independent corrections cannot track diverse test-time corruptions. Our controlled corruption sweeps show that corruption types have similar effects near clean conditions but diverge increasingly with severity, motivating corruption-aware, per-input adaptation. We therefore propose PG-FM (Prompt-Guided Feature Modulation), which adapts RGB-T object detectors to the estimated corruption type and severity of each modality. Under controlled RGB-T corruption simulations, PG-FM preserves clean-set performance, improves mAP50 by up to 20.8 points on FLIR and 19.9 points on KAIST, and transfers without retraining to unmodified, naturally acquired external RGB-T datasets.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41204
Web overlays, such as cookie consent banners, newsletter prompts, and age gates, obstruct automated web crawlers and degrade downstream document representations. While proprietary multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) can accurately identify overlays, their latency and inference cost preclude web-scale ingestion. Conversely, lightweight vision models struggle with full-page renderings characterized by extreme vertical aspect ratios, where standard isotropic resizing collapses critical text features and causes false positives. In this work, we present WebOverlay, a high-throughput vision-only detector trained via distillation from a frontier vision-language teacher. We establish a dynamic tiling strategy that partitions extreme aspect-ratio web renders into aspect-preserving patches with spatial overlap, coupled with an aspect-ratio-aware boundary adjudication mechanism to eliminate boundary artifacts. To eliminate cross-modal latency overheads, our student model relies purely on visual cues, bypassing DOM tree parsing. WebOverlay significantly outperforms DOM-based heuristics and achieves competitive precision and recall against heavy proprietary MLLM baselines while delivering multiple orders of magnitude higher throughput and substantially reduced deployment costs.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41037
Robot perception is increasingly data driven, yet field data is slow, costly, and sometimes disruptive to collect. Video world models offer a cheaper source: seeded with real frames, they extend a recorded scene into new footage with the deployment's sensor, altitude, and environment. We ask whether such synthetic data matches the utility of real field data and whether detectors trained with it perform in the field. Seeding a 7B-parameter world model with wildlife drone video, we more than double the training set with curated frames. On held-out videos from the same drones, mAP@50--95 rises 4.3\% when these frames are added to real data and 10.3\% when they replace it, and up to 33.5\% on an urban benchmark. Although an expert rejects an estimated 87.5\% of generated clips, the data costs about \$1,100 of GPU time, against more than \$3,200 of field labor alone for a less useful real training set. Synthetic data thus shifts data costs from fieldwork to compute.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41030
Conversational RAG benchmarks such as MTRAG and RETECO evaluate retrieval and generation end to end: each system answers from its own retrieval, so abstention must be scored against whether each retrieved context is sufficient. A convenient shortcut reads sufficiency off the relevance judgments and treats a context without gold documents as unanswerable. We re-run the official baselines exactly and test this shortcut on RECOR (RETECO track~2) with four retrievers (nDCG@10 from .18 to .59) and three Qwen3 readers. Two open LLM judges and a panel of four small open models label each context by content, and a model of another family audits 250 contexts blind, with adjudication. The stronger the retriever, the larger the share of no-gold contexts that still contain the answer (28\% to 72\%) and the lower the shortcut's precision (.68 to .10; .70 to .21 under the audit). A reader agrees: Qwen3-4B answers 62--67\% of these false misses correctly, against 23--30\% of no-gold contexts judged insufficient and 1\% with no documents. In most false misses, the answer comes from a hard negative mined for the same question, another turn's gold or a neighbouring chunk of the gold page. On MTRAG, whose judgments come from annotators, precision drops from .72 to .50. Under the shortcut, answerability AUROC is up to .19 too low, and the best sufficiency detector appears to be a retrieval score that never reads the documents. We release code, runs and labels, and recommend scoring refusals against content labels, not the presence of gold.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40966
Long-range detection of small drones is complicated by their visual similarity to birds and by the limited detail available from ground-based cameras. Combining visible and infrared observations offers complementary information, but their usefulness depends on target size, cross-modal alignment, and image quality. We present AVID, a benchmark for studying these factors using real RGB-infrared bird-drone surveillance footage originating from the Drone Detection Dataset and curated for the IEEE ICIP 2025 Video and Image Processing Cup. AVID comprises 32,040 corresponding frame pairs from 115 videos, with 35,952 existing bird and drone annotations at $320\times256$ resolution. Targets occupy an unusually narrow size range: 68.1\% have a geometric-mean bounding-box side of 8--16 pixels, and 99.0\% meet the COCO small-object criterion. To characterize the geometric difficulty of combining the modalities, we introduce an object-relative alignment ratio and an alignment burden curve. In a sample of 300 frame pairs, 32.3\% have estimated global translations greater than 5 pixels; among the 264 pairs with matching annotations, 16.3\% exceed one median target side. We further introduce AVID-C, which simulates seven families of image degradation at five severity levels independently in RGB, infrared, or both. A fixed-feature analysis examines how scale, degradation, and added cross-modal shifts affect fitted bird-drone class overlap. At 12--16 pixels, the Bhattacharyya error bounds are 0.148 for RGB, 0.198 for infrared, and 0.046 for their combined features. These values describe separation in the specified feature and density models, not detector accuracy. Together, AVID and AVID-C support scale-aware, alignment-aware, and sensor-specific studies of tiny aerial targets.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40949
We present TextSeal2, a distortion-free watermark for large language models that keeps its signal under speculative decoding: tokens that replace rejected drafts remain watermarked with the same keys, and the acceptance rate is unchanged. It also preserves output diversity and adds no measurable inference latency. Its predecessor, TextSeal, restores diversity in the Gumbel-max scheme by routing each token to one of two keys via a coin flip. This is suboptimal because the detector averages the scores from both keys without knowing which key was used. TextSeal2 instead merges two or more keys into a single virtual key and couples it to fresh noise through AutoMark's Gaussian copula. Any number of keys, including publicly shared keys, can be merged this way without diluting detection. Under speculative decoding, TextSeal2 verifies keyed drafts with one more exponential race, run on the leftovers of the draft races. By memorylessness, this race reproduces block verification, so the output follows the target model exactly. We evaluate TextSeal2 on three LLMs. At equal output token diversity, TextSeal2 detects 8 to 22 percentage points more 100-token answers than TextSeal at a false-positive rate of $10^{-3}$, and is comparable to textGrain while requiring no post-logits optimization. Under speculative decoding, it detects 18 and 22 percentage points more 200-token answers than TextSeal and textGrain, respectively, at the same acceptance rate.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.40613
LiDAR-based 3D perception underpins autonomous driving and robotics, yet deploying these models safely requires stress-testing them against adversarial inputs before real-world use. Although state-of-the-art adversarial attacks exist, their implementations are often fragmented across individual repositories, each tied to a specific architecture or task and requiring manual environment reconstruction and model-specific integration code. We present LIDARSHIELD, a unified and fully Dockerized framework that reverses this workflow: rather than installing the target model inside the toolkit, LIDARSHIELD exposes any model through three lightweight HTTP endpoints, namely /info, /forward, and /gradient As a result, connecting a new model or dataset requires only a single loader function or adapter. The framework supports both 3D semantic segmentation and 3D object detection through the same engine-service protocol, integrating a task-aware suite of state-of-the-art attacks, including PGD and Square Attack for segmentation, and point perturbation, point removal, point injection, and LiDAttack for detection. This enables systematic exposure of corner cases and vulnerabilities across heterogeneous LiDAR backbones. The LiDAR-Shield codebase is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39848