Abstract
Data-driven robots must learn to avoid collisions with as few demonstrations as possible to avoid collecting large datasets of destructive collision examples. We explore whole-body proximity sensors as inductive biases for learning reflexive collision-dodging behavior and find that lossy sensors with low resolution were stronger biases than high-resolution coverage. We also found that, perhaps unintuitively, anticipating when and where contact happens on the body of a robot reduced its learning sample efficiency. We investigated eight candidate representations in a reinforcement learning environment, which included latent compression, future contact anticipation, lossy corruption, and privileged state estimation. The candidate representations were tested by training over 200 humanoid robots to play a simplified version of dodgeball end-to-end under an intentionally constrained sample and compute budget.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31891
