Paper Reading AI Learner

Multi-Domain Physics-Based MDO of Multirotor UAVs: A Deterministic Framework for Discrete COTS Sizing

2026-07-24 03:52:36
Akshay Gupta Burela, P. B. Sujit

Abstract

Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) design is governed by a tightly coupled system of non-linear equations spanning structural mechanics, electrochemistry, aerodynamics, and kinematics. Solved sequentially, a miscalibrated sub-model coefficient triggers a mass-compounding cascade failure--the Mass Snowball effect. This paper presents AeroEval, a physics-based, Multidisciplinary Design Optimization (MDO) engine that simultaneously resolves all subsystem couplings and maps continuous sizing optima to physically purchasable, commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components. The MDO engine is validated under a strict calibrate/test protocol that eliminates circularity: three structural/packaging coefficients are fitted on a held-out cohort of 20 do-it-yourself (DIY) and legacy platforms, then frozen and evaluated blind on 19 modern commercial drone platforms spanning 377 g to 76 kg. On the commercial test cohort the engine predicts Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) within 7.2% Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), with a mean complexity factor $k \approx 1.05 \pm 0.08$ and $\text{RMSE}_{\text{MTOW}} = 1.59$ kg; the DIY calibration cohort, characterized by high build variability, yields 26.1% MAPE. Battery mass is predicted within 7.9% on single-pack platforms, with a disclosed systematic underprediction on redundant multi-battery enterprise platforms. A 14-parameter sensitivity suite of >300 simulations quantifies partial derivatives of takeoff mass and flight time; forward velocity diverges beyond 25.5 m/s due to cubic parasite power growth. The path-dependent mass-shedding model for agricultural and delivery roles reduces structural frame mass by up to 40.6% and energy capacity by 33.7% relative to static baselines. Typical solver convergence requires 25-50 iterations, completing in under 50 ms on a standard desktop CPU.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.22768

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.22768.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot