As large language models generate increasingly high-quality responses, recent work on response evaluation has moved beyond response-centered criteria, such as correctness and coherence, toward user-centered criteria, including user preferences and perceived usefulness. This shift is fundamentally important for developing technologies that are truly useful to real-world users. While conventional response evaluation quantifies the quality of the response itself, users' satisfaction in real conversations also depends on their subjective preferences and perceptions of usefulness, which do not necessarily align with response quality. This study investigates whether such user-centered signals can be detected from conversational text. Specifically, we analyze user utterances with self-reported dissatisfaction labels to examine whether user dissatisfaction in text can be detected. In English interaction, models using user utterances exceeded the 17.8% dissatisfaction label prevalence in AUPRC by up to 15 percentage points. These results suggest that user utterances reveal cues to implicit dissatisfaction. Furthermore, changes from the immediately preceding user utterance may improve dissatisfaction detection, with anomaly detection methods appearing particularly effective.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13894
Interpretability demonstrations often show that intervening on a group of neurons changes a model's answer. A recent example removes an 18-neuron group in Qwen3-32B and the model answers "Simba" instead of "Scar" to a two-hop Lion King riddle. Such a demonstration establishes that the group matters, but not how much of it is necessary, whether other groups could do the same, or whether the effect carries over to other inputs. We ask: when intervening on a group of neurons changes a model's answer, how much of that group is actually necessary? For every selected group we measure all 4,096 subsets of 12 MLP neurons. On a two-alternative capital task (Qwen3-0.6B), zero-ablating 12 selected neurons lowers the answer margin by 27% while random neurons barely change it, yet replacing the same neurons with their values from other questions also barely changes it: their activations are nearly constant across questions, and we find no evidence that they carry question-specific content. On two-hop relation chains, patching 12 neurons with activations from the first-hop question shifts the answer to the bridge entity (from Scar to Simba): the greedy answer starts with the bridge in 9/11 chains for Qwen3-1.7B, 9/11 for Llama-3.2-1B and 8/10 for Gemma-3-1B; random neurons never do. The full group is rarely necessary: a few neurons often suffice, and in many chains disjoint subsets each flip the answer on their own, in an exploratory analysis most often when the model is less confident. Group effects transfer to rephrasings of the same chain but are much weaker on other tested chains. We study neuron-level causal interventions and alternative subsets; we do not recover the full connectivity of circuits.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13885
Continual pre-training (CPT) adapts large language models (LLMs) to specialized domains, yet its standard next-token prediction (NTP) objective treats every corpus token as a fixed target, regardless of its utility to the current model. In a controlled study on the same 1B-token mathematical corpus, we observe sharply different outcomes across base models: NTP improves Llama-3.2-3B's performance on mathematical benchmarks but substantially degrades Qwen3-1.7B-Base's performance, indicating that, under a fixed training recipe, the same training sequences can have model-dependent effects. To address this problem, we introduce On-Policy Mid-Training Distillation (OPMD), which reformulates mid-training from offline text imitation into active, query-driven knowledge acquisition. At selected anchor positions, OPMD samples trajectories from the evolving student policy and applies dense token-level reverse-KL rewards from a frozen teacher, training the model on states it actually visits rather than only on ground-truth prefixes. This on-policy objective reduces the training-generation mismatch of teacher-forced NTP. On MATH-500 and Minerva, OPMD improves the Qwen student over its base performance and outperforms the evaluated NTP baseline, which degrades on both benchmarks. OPMD integrates into CPT pipelines without added inference-time overhead and offers a model-aware alternative to passive domain adaptation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13855
This paper contains examples of stereotypes about veterans and displaced people that may be offensive or distressing. Social bias benchmarks for language models commonly examine categories such as gender, race, and religion, often drawn from lists of legally protected characteristics. Veterans and internally displaced people (IDPs) fall outside these lists, and stereotypes about them, which can undermine access to employment, housing, and social participation, remain largely absent from language model evaluation. We introduce WarBias, a Ukrainian-English benchmark of stereotypes about these two groups. Built from a taxonomy of 120 stereotype claims grounded in research and monitoring reports, WarBias contains 1,007 stereotype-counter-stereotype-unrelated sentence triplets and 240 multiple-choice questions per language. A Ukrainian language model selected in a blinded human pilot generated the Ukrainian triplets. At least two independent annotators reviewed each triplet in the annotation cohort. The authors revised items in response to the reviews, and the final release was machine-translated into English. Each claim carries a human severity rating. In a baseline evaluation of six models, four prefer stereotypical Ukrainian sentences about at least one group, most strongly about IDPs, while English scores are mostly balanced. WarBias supports complementary evaluations of stereotypical preferences and context-sensitive judgments, and provides paired forget/retain material for unlearning-based bias mitigation. We document the benchmark's construction, intended uses, and limitations, and offer its construction method as a template for analogous benchmarks in other conflict-affected societies.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.11284
We present Alania-2, a Turkish text-to-speech (TTS) system with two built-in voices, voice design from text descriptions, and two kinds of voice cloning. Alania-2 is a 488M-parameter model with the VoxCPM architecture, which generates continuous audio latents with a diffusion head on top of a language-model backbone. We train it from scratch on 18,195 hours of Turkish speech, 90% of which is synthetic speech produced by a larger teacher model and filtered automatically. A text normalizer rewrites numbers, abbreviations and foreign names into the words a Turkish speaker would say; without it, none of 96 test sentences with digits kept all its critical parts, such as an amount or a date, through synthesis and speech recognition, against 86 with it. On Freya-TR-Eval, a public benchmark of 495 Turkish sentences scored with automatic speech recognition, Alania-2 reaches a word error rate of 1.44%, compared with 5.99% for our previous system. On its built-in voices, it comes within half a point of character error rate of a 2.3B-parameter model at under a quarter of the size, and a 7.6M-parameter single-voice model trained with the same recipe matches the most intelligible systems we measured, which suggests that training data matters more for intelligibility than model size. We also report practical findings on voice cloning: conditioning on the reference audio alone, rather than continuing it, cuts skipped words from 21.9% to 1.7%; 20-30 seconds of reference audio works best; and a low-rank adapter trained in about two minutes raises speaker similarity well above instant cloning. Finally, we describe inference-engine changes that bring first audio down to 32 ms for a single stream. We release our evaluation harness and three Turkish speech and text datasets.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13845
Antalia-2 Mini is a single-voice Turkish text-to-speech model with 7,620,931 parameters. It reads characters and produces 48 kHz audio at 41 times real time on an Apple M5 laptop CPU (2 threads). Its training audio came only from VoxCPM2 (the teacher), about 300 times larger, cloning one synthetic clip; automatic checks kept about 1,790 h. Fine-tuning the vocoder on the acoustic model's own mel spectrograms cut the word error rate (WER) of Whisper's transcripts from a mean of 3.89% to 1.75% at adjacent pre-release checkpoints. The teacher corrupts the start of a clip when the first word begins with ö, the student learned this, and a spoken prefix we cut from the output hides it. On the 495-sentence Freya-TR-Eval benchmark, where we tuned settings, version 1.0.1 has WER 1.09% and character error rate 0.22% on our public harness. A paired bootstrap cannot distinguish these from EMA Lightning, an 8.6M Turkish model, which scores higher on full-band UTMOS, an English-trained quality proxy. No human listening test exists. Weights, inference code and the benchmark harness are public under Apache-2.0; training code and data are not.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13811
Minimal-pair benchmarks are only as good as their labels, and LLMs are an obvious substitute for costly human validation. We test it on BLiMP (English) and QFrBLiMP (Quebec French), the two public minimal-pair datasets releasing every forced-choice human judgment. Three LLMs validate by forced choice, by rating, and as a panel, scored against human panels of one, three and five judges in two pre-registered phases. On BLiMP, forced-choice validators agree with held-out human majorities more often than five-judge panels, yet catch far fewer pairs whose label humans reject than one judge does. By point estimate, no validator is worth more than one judge. The errors are not random. On both datasets, across 10 open LMs, human-supported pairs that the pre-registered LLM filter flags are 18.9 points harder than those it accepts, in all 70 LM-validator combinations, and harder than pairs a single human judge flags. Filtering thus removes items on which LMs fail but humans do not, raising accuracy more than random removal. A protocol frozen before any output replicates the gap and the lift on Dutch BLiMP-NL. LLM validation makes minimal-pair benchmarks easier for the models they are meant to test; we release code, validator outputs and item-level scores.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13788
Emotion vectors are directions in a language model's internal representations that are associated with emotional concepts. Prior work shows that these vectors can influence model behavior, but their role in sentiment classification remains unclear. This study investigates emotion directions in Qwen2.5-0.5B-Instruct and Qwen2.5-3B-Instruct. Eight directions extracted from GoEmotions are evaluated through sentiment probing, activation interventions, and supervised correction. Emotion-only probes achieve 88.66% and 90.70% accuracy on binary TweetEval. In exploratory matched-ablation experiments, raw emotion-space removal causes 2.39 and 1.10 percentage points more accuracy loss than matched isotropic random-subspace removal for 0.5B and 3B, respectively. All four TweetEval raw and denoised effects are significant after Holm adjustment across eight comparisons. An exploratory SST-2 extension shows smaller raw excess losses of 0.66 and 0.57 points, with no effects surviving Holm adjustment. Frozen sentiment-correction classifiers are also tested on 20,000 Amazon Polarity reviews. Emotion-based correction improves accuracy over uncorrected Qwen, but does not consistently outperform margin-only baselines. These results distinguish sentiment information available in model representations, the effects of changing those representations, and their practical value for classification. They do not establish a uniquely emotional mechanism.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13744
We present Walrus, a unified 8B speech-and-audio foundation model handling speech recognition (including code-switching and multi-talker speech), speech-to-text and speech-to-speech translation, text-to-speech, emotion recognition, audio captioning, and general audio understanding. Our main contribution is not a new architecture but a data-centric training recipe; we use a standard decoder-only backbone initialized from Gemma 4, so that gains can be traced to the data. For speech generation, Walrus predicts low-bitrate discrete speech tokens, and a lightweight token-to-waveform decoder converts them into high-fidelity audio. The recipe is a three-stage data curriculum that moves from broad multilingual data to multi-talker, code-switching, and domain-specific data. At each stage, task-aware and dataset-aware weighting balances tasks with very different token budgets and protects core skills from forgetting. Trained on over 600M samples covering more than 20 tasks and 100 languages, Walrus leads on most multilingual, multi-talker, and code-switching ASR, speech translation, and audio understanding benchmarks, outperforming both open speech language models of comparable size and dedicated task-specific models. On most benchmarks, it even matches or surpasses the $4\times$ larger Qwen3-Omni's performance. Results suggest that data engineering is a primary driver of quality in multi-task speech and audio modeling.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13689
Media bias understanding and detection remains an under-researched problem for Indian context, specifically for Indic languages, such as, Hindi, which is widely spoken in India. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive, multi-annotator, explainable dataset consisting of 448 unique articles from four leading Indian news agencies publishing in Hindi. We focus on Hindi, the most spoken and an official language of India. The study of media bias is particularly relevant in the Indian context due to the country's linguistic diversity and large population, where the same event is often reported by multiple news agencies in different languages, thereby introducing scope for bias. The dataset comprises Hindi political news articles annotated by 14 experts and classified into four bias categories - selection bias, framing bias, clickbait bias and omission bias - when an article is identified as biased or unbiased. For each biased article, annotators also provide a textual explanation, enabling future semi-automated approaches to incorporate explainability when language models reason over the dataset. Cohen's Kappa scores were 0.81 for simple bias/no-bias classification reflecting strong inter-annotator agreement. For the multi-label task, the Cohen's Kappa values are 0.89, 0.75, 0.81, and 0.79 for clickbait, selection, framing, and omission biases, respectively, resulting in an average Kappa of 0.80, which also reflects strong agreement.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13686
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is bottlenecked by the token budget of large language models: feeding long documents into the context window is expensive, while aggressive textual compression discards fine-grained information that is irreversibly lost in a one-dimensional token sequence. We argue that this bottleneck is not fundamental to information density but to the choice of compression \emph{modality}. Modern visual encoders can pack the contents of a rendered text page into roughly a hundred visual tokens with little semantic loss, opening a new compression-fidelity tradeoff that purely textual methods cannot reach. We present \textbf{OpticalRAG}, a framework that renders documents as page images, encodes them with a frozen vision encoder, and distills the retrieved visual tokens into as few as $16$ injected tokens before passing them to the LLM. Two ingredients make this work without expensive cross-modal training: (i) \emph{Encoder-Bridged Retrieval}, which projects text-query states into the visual feature space of the frozen encoder, through a projection shared with the compressor, to retrieve visual tokens from a text query, with no contrastive training; and (ii) \emph{Query-Driven Distillation}, a lightweight cross-attention compressor that condenses the retrieved visual tokens into a small set of query-conditioned prefix tokens. On LongBench-v2, BAMBOO, and LooGLE-v2, OpticalRAG achieves the best compression-aware accuracy (CAP) on all three benchmarks while injecting only $16$ tokens, and improves the closed-book Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct backbone by $5.17$ points on this http URL is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13675
This technical report presents MNN-Pocket-0.3B, a compact 300M-parameter dense language model designed for efficient on-device deployment and supporting context lengths of up to 32K tokens. With an INT4 deployment footprint of only 173 MB and decoding throughput of up to 466 tokens/s on iPad Pro M5 (Metal), it can be seamlessly integrated into applications on edge devices such as smartphones and smart glasses. MNN-Pocket-0.3B is developed through the co-design of its architecture, data, training pipeline, and inference system. Hardware-aware architecture selection and dependency-aware vocabulary pruning balance model capability with on-device memory and compute constraints. A four-stage pre-training pipeline covering approximately 4.1 trillion high-quality Chinese and English tokens equips the model with broad knowledge and reasoning capabilities. This is followed by a three-stage post-training pipeline comprising instruction fine-tuning, multi-teacher on-policy distillation, and quantization-aware training. Finally, hardware-specific optimizations in the MNN inference engine enable fast, memory-efficient inference and long-context processing. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that MNN-Pocket-0.3B achieves frontier-level performance among models of comparable size, with particularly strong results in Chinese and English knowledge and reasoning, mathematics, coding, and instruction following. It consistently outperforms similarly sized open-source models and even surpasses several 0.5B-parameter models on instruction-following benchmarks. We release MNN-Pocket-0.3B with open weights and ready-to-use MNN deployment packages. We hope it will provide a practical foundation for capable, responsive, and memory-efficient edge applications while advancing research and development in on-device language models.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12311
Attributing early Chinese Buddhist translations requires evidence that scholars can trace back to the texts. We develop an interpretable stylometric framework that uses features defined or reviewed by Buddhist philologists, including function characters, sentence formulas, sentence-final characters, sentence length, and part-of-speech n-grams. We construct stylistic profiles from 31 authenticated translations by seven translators from the Eastern Han through the Western Jin, then compare eight disputed texts with An Shigao's profile. Two texts, T1557 and T0101, show the strongest stylistic similarity to the authenticated An Shigao corpus, with scores of 0.783 and 0.687, respectively. The attributions agree with those reported by a published BERT-based approach on the same set of disputed texts. The framework requires no task-specific training and allows scholars to inspect which linguistic features support each proposed attribution.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13636
Byte-level BPE fragments Chinese text (for Qwen3.8 on Chinese Wikipedia, 3.84 bytes per token on average; 64% of tokens are single characters) and hides spelling from the model. We ask whether an already-trained 27B subword model can be converted directly into a pure byte-level model (one byte, one token), without a patching structure or a local encoder, while keeping most of its ability. Starting from Qwen3.8-27B (48 Gated DeltaNet layers + 16 full-attention layers), we shrink the vocabulary from 248,320 to 384 entries (the 256 byte symbols already in the BPE vocabulary plus special ids), leave every other weight untouched, and continue training in a two-stage curriculum (encoding first, then reading) on 4.77 GB of supervised bytes: all dialogue/behavioral supervision is generated on-policy by the original model itself (character dictionary, word dictionary, general dialogue, coding sessions), and knowledge reading uses encyclopedia text (54% of supervised bytes). Training takes 178.6 h on 8xH200. On the same GPU and serving stack, the byte model's gap to the original falls within the paired bootstrap interval on MATH-500, HumanEval+, MMLU-Pro and non-thinking GSM8K, and it loses 4-6 points on C-Eval, thinking-mode GSM8K and non-thinking IFEval. Without thinking it leads on every character-level task (CUTE 75.2 -> 84.0, EXECUTE-zho 81.6 -> 93.9, our Chinese character suite 54.4 -> 64.0), but lookup knowledge about Chinese characters such as pronunciation and stroke count drops, and thinking does not recover it. The cost is throughput: per-step speed is identical, but each step yields 3-5x less output; Chinese characters per second is about 1/4 of the original, and prefill at 64K bytes is 6.5x slower. We also document four byte-model failure modes (greedy runaway, sampling breaking UTF-8, ineffective penalty terms on a small vocabulary, repetition) and their fixes.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13607
Language-model systems in rule-governed domains often pair the model with a deterministic fact layer, but which facts that layer should supply is rarely measured. We measure it in the Chinese sexagenary system underlying BaZi chart analysis, where every fact has one table-checkable value: 682 items over twelve fact categories and 160 transit--natal collision items, posed closed-book, with the reference table, and with computed facts at increasing levels. In eleven open-weight models answering directly, errors concentrate where attributes must be combined: none gets more than 4\% of sexagenary days or 1\% of collisions right. Static attributes have no consistent effect, and the complete relation list leaves most direct-answering models near zero although it contains the answer. A query-filtered layer (exploratory) raises Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-32B to 78--92\% and four further models to 96--100\%. Three proprietary reasoning models compute 68--95\% of collisions unaided. On chess positions, under predictions locked in advance, attributes again do not substitute for relations and listed distractors are misattributed. The fact layer must supply computed interactions; how they are presented depends on the model and the domain.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13597
Verifying corporate financial disclosures against the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is a core auditing task in which experts cross-reference disclosures with hundreds of fine-grained regulatory paragraphs: a laborious, costly, and error-prone process that motivates growing interest in large language models (LLMs) as compliance assistants. Yet single-model accuracy remains insufficient for high-stakes use, and naive ensembling is vulnerable to systematic per-model biases that can drag aggregate accuracy below that of the strongest individual annotator. This gap is addressed with a multi-stage framework, supported by a new benchmark of 19,998 IFRS regulation-disclosure pairs comprising 11,161 unanimous multi-LLM labels and 8,837 human annotations on items where the LLMs disagreed. The framework couples a three-stage domain-adapted sentence embedding pipeline (BERT masked language modeling on SEC EDGAR filings, unsupervised TSDAE and SimCSE adaptation, and supervised contrastive alignment) with a learned ensemble classifier that fuses frozen embeddings and LLM probability features from GPT-4.1, Claude Sonnet 4, and Gemini 2.5 Pro via Tree-structured Parzen Estimator (TPE) optimized gradient-boosted trees. On the disagreement set, the ensemble achieves 81.7% weighted F1, exceeding the strongest single LLM by 10.4 points and majority voting by 14.6 points, and outperforms eleven unsupervised aggregation baselines; the retrieval pipeline attains Recall@15 of 45.3% on unseen regulations. The dataset, model checkpoints, annotation platform, and classifier implementation will be publicly released.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13595
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities across diverse applications, making both safety and utility essential for reliable deployment. Jailbreak attacks use diverse forms of adversarial prompting to bypass alignment safeguards and induce LLMs to generate harmful responses. Some representation-based defenses regulate internal activations using predefined steering directions or learned safety regions. However, adapting intervention to each input without a predefined representational target while limiting over-refusal remains a challenge. In this paper, we propose Target-free Entropy-guided Residual Modulation (TERM), an inference-time defense that uses prompt-calibrated attention entropy deviations to guide adaptive modulation of the model's own residual updates. Attention patterns vary across prompts and decoding steps, making raw entropy values difficult to interpret as a consistent signal for intervention. We therefore calibrate attention entropy against each prompt's own prefill baseline to establish an input-specific reference for reducing unnecessary intervention on benign requests. Adaptive scale normalization and temporal accumulation then account for differences in deviation scale and persistence to determine intervention strength. The resulting signal controls bounded scaling of the model's own residual updates, without relying on a predefined safety direction. We compare our method with seven defenses on seven jailbreak attacks and two over-refusal benchmarks across Llama, Qwen, and Gemma models, including Qwen3 models from 0.6B to 32B. Results show our method improves jailbreak robustness while maintaining low over-refusal on benign safety-sensitive requests with modest inference overhead.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13578
Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong capabilities across diverse applications, making both safety and utility essential for reliable deployment. Jailbreak attacks use diverse forms of adversarial prompting to bypass alignment safeguards and induce LLMs to generate harmful responses. Some representation-based defenses regulate internal activations using predefined steering directions or learned safety regions. However, adapting intervention to each input without a predefined representational target while limiting over-refusal remains a challenge. In this paper, we propose Target-free Entropy-guided Residual Modulation (TERM), an inference-time defense that uses prompt-calibrated attention entropy deviations to guide adaptive modulation of the model's own residual updates. Attention patterns vary across prompts and decoding steps, making raw entropy values difficult to interpret as a consistent signal for intervention. We therefore calibrate attention entropy against each prompt's own prefill baseline to establish an input-specific reference for reducing unnecessary intervention on benign requests. Adaptive scale normalization and temporal accumulation then account for differences in deviation scale and persistence to determine intervention strength. The resulting signal controls bounded scaling of the model's own residual updates, without relying on a predefined safety direction. We compare our method with seven defenses on seven jailbreak attacks and two over-refusal benchmarks across Llama, Qwen, and Gemma models, including Qwen3 models from 0.6B to 32B. Results show our method improves jailbreak robustness while maintaining low over-refusal on benign safety-sensitive requests with modest inference overhead.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13577
Tokenisers such as Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) shorten text by repeatedly merging an adjacent pair of symbols into a new one; fewer tokens mean less computation. We ask whether an efficient algorithm can choose $k$ merges that leave a string of length $n$ almost as short as possible; doing nothing is already within a factor $n$. We prove that, unless P = NP, no polynomial-time algorithm comes within a factor $c\,n/\log n$, for some constant $c>0$, already for one binary string and for BPE-style merges that replace every occurrence. The key idea is that $k$ merges form a grammar with $k$ rules: a vertex-cover gap becomes a grammar-size gap, which we amplify with relabelled copies, encode in binary and realise with explicit merges. For merges that may skip occurrences, a simple algorithm achieves $O(n/\log\log n)$, and no Karp reduction can prove hardness beyond order $n/\log n$ unless coNP $\subseteq$ NP/poly. Over a one-letter alphabet, both tokenisation problems left open by Kastreva et al. are strongly NP-complete on datasets with repeated strings.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13568
Benchmark scores for medical large language models (LLMs) are difficult to interpret when scoring criteria cannot be traced to clinical evidence. Here we developed Med Evidence Bench (MEB; this https URL), comprising 1,536 physician-constructed items across three levels: guideline knowledge, standardized clinical scenarios and real-world laboratory scenarios. Each criterion stating a medical claim is linked to a versioned source-text span. Across ten LLMs, the Evidence Trace Score (ETS) was 0.975-0.997 for guideline knowledge, 0.292-0.658 for standardized scenarios and 0.182-0.447 for real-world scenarios, and rankings varied across levels. For real-world scenarios, scores for identifying clinical information (mean, 0.770) exceeded those for matching evidence (0.165) or formulating recommendations (0.160). On 1,296 criterion-level judgments, automated grading agreed with the majority vote of three physicians (macro-F1, 0.930; 95% confidence interval, 0.915-0.945), although agreement was lower for evidence application. These findings from Chinese-language materials indicate that guideline recall does not ensure patient-specific evidence use and do not establish clinical effectiveness.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13562