Abstract
This paper contains examples of stereotypes about veterans and displaced people that may be offensive or distressing. Social bias benchmarks for language models commonly examine categories such as gender, race, and religion, often drawn from lists of legally protected characteristics. Veterans and internally displaced people (IDPs) fall outside these lists, and stereotypes about them, which can undermine access to employment, housing, and social participation, remain largely absent from language model evaluation. We introduce WarBias, a Ukrainian-English benchmark of stereotypes about these two groups. Built from a taxonomy of 120 stereotype claims grounded in research and monitoring reports, WarBias contains 1,007 stereotype-counter-stereotype-unrelated sentence triplets and 240 multiple-choice questions per language. A Ukrainian language model selected in a blinded human pilot generated the Ukrainian triplets. At least two independent annotators reviewed each triplet in the annotation cohort. The authors revised items in response to the reviews, and the final release was machine-translated into English. Each claim carries a human severity rating. In a baseline evaluation of six models, four prefer stereotypical Ukrainian sentences about at least one group, most strongly about IDPs, while English scores are mostly balanced. WarBias supports complementary evaluations of stereotypical preferences and context-sensitive judgments, and provides paired forget/retain material for unlearning-based bias mitigation. We document the benchmark's construction, intended uses, and limitations, and offer its construction method as a template for analogous benchmarks in other conflict-affected societies.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.11284
