Review
-
CardioLM: A multilingual suite of small language models for the cardiology domain
2026-11-05 12:41:19Manuela-Daniela Danu, Miguel Rodr\'iguez-Ortega, Alberto Becerra-Tome, Pablo Arancibia, Fernando Gallego-Donoso, Lorenzo Pratesi, Xi Bai, Andrei-Damian Dinescu, Salvador Lima-L\'opez, Andrea Guala, Saskia Haitjema, Jonas Mack, Michele Miranda, Wesam Al Nabki, Jan Rodr\'iguez-Miret, Vasile George Marica, Vladim\'ir Kincl, Kate\v{r}ina Dost\'alov\'a, Michael Andrej, Alicia Ujil, Corinne Allaart, Machteld Boonstra, Malin Overmars, Anoop Shah, Giovanna Ceroni, Jonathan Kossoff, Domenico D'Amario, Renzo Laborante, Antonio Iaconelli, Isabella Fumarulo, Jacopo Lenkowicz, Livia Lilli, Emma Weiss, Alex Scafa, Felix Lindberg, Milou Gamage, Eul\`alia Farr\'e-Maduell, S\'ebastien Brati\`eres, Martin Krallinger, Bram van EsAbstract
Background: Cardiovascular care generates large volumes of clinical free-text documentation in local languages. However, clinical natural language processing (NLP) resources remain concentrated in English, and no existing benchmark is cardiology-specific, multilingual, and broad in entity coverage. Methods: We present two contributions. The first is CardioCCC, a corpus of 508 cardiology case reports originally published in Spanish and extended to Czech, Dutch, English, Italian, Romanian, and Swedish through machine translation, annotation projection, and clinician review, with annotations covering diseases, symptoms, procedures, and medications. The second is CardioLM, comprising CardioBERTa, a set of language-specific encoders obtained by continued pretraining on cardiology and biomedical corpora, and CardioNER, a set of named entity recognition (NER) models fine-tuned on CardioCCC. Results: Cardiology-specific pretraining reduced pseudo-perplexity by up to a factor of eight, yet changed strict span-level F1 by at most 0.04, with benefits concentrated in languages whose backbones lacked biomedical coverage. The jointly trained multilingual XLM-RoBERTa-large models achieved the best strict F1 in nearly every language and entity type, exceeding the strongest monolingual system by up to 0.13 F1. A large share of residual errors concerned boundary detection: relaxed matching recovered 0.10-0.23 F1 for disease, procedure, and symptom, but only 0.01-0.07 for medication. Clinicians rated CardioNER well above a rule- and dictionary-based baseline, with the mean rating across entity types rising from 26% to 73%. Conclusions: Specialty-specific pretraining is not the decisive factor for downstream entity recognition, whereas multilingual joint training yields the strongest results in nearly all settings and a simpler deployment path for multi-country clinical information extraction.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07940
PDF
-
Decodability Is Not Validity: Evaluating Nuisance Sensitivity in Language Model Concept Probes
Abstract
Two concept probes can be equally accurate at predicting a concept from a language model's hidden states while their scores contain different mixtures of the target concept and a correlated nuisance attribute. In four target--nuisance settings (two aspect sentiments in CEBaB; occupation and gender in BiasBios; Amazon review sentiment with negation, and with first-person framing), two LLMs, and a population of concept extractors, we compare decodability with discriminant evidence: the score's dependence on the nuisance at fixed target, and its response to input edits intended to change only the nuisance, filtered by two LLM judges and compared against placebo edits. Under correlated training data, extractors that are statistically equivalent in held-out AUROC differ up to several-fold in nuisance sensitivity in three of the four settings, and decodability is not a reliable proxy for it: their rank correlation changes sign across settings. The effect follows the probe's training data, not the nuisance's natural association with the target: first-person framing, unrelated to sentiment in natural reviews, is absorbed at least as much as negation, which co-occurs with negative sentiment, and decorrelated training removes the systematic effect. Selecting extractors with nuisance-aware development diagnostics, which need nuisance labels but no counterfactuals, lowers counterfactual nuisance sensitivity wherever the default choice is sensitive, at a small accuracy cost. Concept measurements should be validated, not just decoded.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07805
PDF
-
Human-Centred, Risk-Constrained Evaluation of Financial Document Recognition: Evidence, Critical Errors, and Selective Automation
Abstract
Financial document recognition is often assessed using character and word error rates, although these metrics do not express whether a system preserves the financial facts on which people and organisations act. This paper develops a human-centred, risk-constrained framework for evaluating financial document recognition as evidence recovery and decision support. It defines typed financial facts linked to visible source regions and separates verbatim transcription, deterministic normalization, and business interpretation. A layered quality model covers text, localization, layout, tables, fields, fact correctness, evidence grounding, uncertainty, robustness, and operational performance. Non-compensatory acceptance gates use one-sided uncertainty bounds for critical-field errors, preventing strong aggregate scores from masking failures in amounts, identifiers, signs, periods, or entity associations. Selective automation is formulated as a constrained routing problem that accounts for residual risk, human-review capacity, and review cost. The framework further specifies annotation and adjudication procedures, leakage-resistant benchmark partitions, statistical estimands, subgroup analyses, and a reproducibility card. Formal results establish the limitations of compensatory scoring, the non-zero upper risk bound after zero observed errors, and a loss sensitive decision rule for routing uncertain cases to human review. The contribution is theoretical and methodological; no new model, dataset, or empirical performance result is claimed.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02775
PDF
-
ReviewMap: Mapping Evaluative Acts and Automation Boundaries in Peer-Review Comments
Abstract
Peer-review comments check what a paper does and judge why it matters, but no existing scheme distinguishes these two evaluative acts. We argue that making these acts explicit and measuring how reliably LLMs identify them is a prerequisite for responsible LLM-assisted review analysis: humans need to inspect review judgments and their grounds. This defines a more honest mission for NLP in peer review than full automation. We present ReviewMap, a framework that classifies each comment as assessment of claims and scholarly standards or calibration of contribution value and venue fit, with finer-grained attributes applied conditionally by act type. Applied to 500 ICLR~2026 papers through multi-model LLM consensus, the act layer proves reliably automatable under the operational guideline (inter-model $\kappa \geq 0.75$), supported by five-human validation on 470 development comments, while the attribute layer requires human oversight, defining a measured automation boundary. At the corpus level, 17% of reviewer-paper instances contain no panel-coded calibration, and the panel-coded calibration share is nearly $3\times$ as high in Strengths as in Weaknesses. This boundary informs three affordances: a review guideline that operationalizes the assessment-then-calibration workflow for reviewers, a per-comment rebuttal strategy scaffold for authors, and a discussion-phase dashboard for area chairs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07489
PDF
-
Taurus: LLM-in-the-Loop CT Annotation Matches Coding Agents at Half the Cost
2026-11-05 03:15:53Bing Hu, Rishabh SharmaAbstract
Dense labels of the aorta in CT are slow to draw, and the public aortic CT datasets that could stand in for them each label different structures under their own conventions. Large language model (LLM) agents can now write code and read images. We asked whether such a model labels these scans better as a free-form agent that writes its own segmentation code, or inside a harness, where an automated pass labels the scan and the model reviews the result. We built a harness, Taurus, and compared it with free-form agents by blind label recovery: we withheld the human labels of six public datasets (939 volumes) and scored every approach against each dataset's own classes. In the first version of Taurus, the model's review raised the primary metric on only two of six datasets, by less than the noise between two reviews of the same case. A free-form agent running Claude Opus 5.5 scored higher on most datasets. Moving what the free-form agents did well into the automated pass then carried most of the gain on 38 held-out cases. The final version smooths the label surfaces with a fixed rule and checks for the large errors the automated pass tends to make, such as an aneurysm drawn to half its size. Each check that fires puts a multiple-choice question to the model, with candidate corrections drawn on the scan. It matched the surface smoothness of the human references, and in the primary metric we found no difference from the free-form Opus agent, at under half its cost, $1.22 against $2.71 per case. Most of what made Taurus competitive came from the harness and its automation rather than from the language model itself. Taurus shows that this kind of annotation can be automated, so that expert time can move from drawing labels to checking them.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.00247
PDF
-
AI Slop and Hallucinations in Vulnerability Assessment: A Survey on Reasoning Failures and Trustworthy Mitigation
2026-11-05 03:08:19Junchen Ding, Jialiang Dong, Yichen Zhu, Yi Liu, Gelei Deng, Willy Susilo, Siqi Ma, Yuekang LiAbstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into cybersecurity has transformed vulnerability assessment, but it has also produced a trustworthiness crisis driven by the unchecked proliferation of "AI slop." These artifacts, hallucinated vulnerabilities, plausible but incorrect patches, and semantically repackaged bug reports, impose a cognitive burden on human triage pipelines that mirrors a denial-of-service attack. This paper surveys the empirical evidence, identifies a unifying mechanism, and traces a path toward trustworthy triage. We formalize a taxonomy of AI slop grounded in a structured literature review and dissect its root cause: the gap between the causal deductive reasoning of security experts and the autoregressive probabilistic generation of current LLMs. We operationalize this gap through a measurable proxy, the Deductive Coverage Score, and show that chain-of-thought prompting and tool-using agents narrow but do not close it. We review mitigation strategies and argue that passive detection and watermarking target provenance rather than correctness, facing fundamental entropy constraints. We instead advocate for active neuro-symbolic verification, mapping each pipeline component to prior systems with documented limits on security inputs. Finally, we specify two evaluation instruments, CVE-Bench and Slop-Score, including dataset construction, metric formulas, and anti-gaming provisions. By shifting evaluation from linguistic fluency to mathematical verifiability, this survey provides a roadmap for securing emerging AI-driven triage systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.25667
PDF
-
KG-Neighbor: Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Construction for Embedding Visualization
2026-11-04 23:54:02Chang Won Kim, Jaewook Lee, Haeun Min, JunNyeong Jeong, Minwoo Sim, Barom Kang, Kyohoon JinAbstract
In embedding visualizations, nearby instances are interpreted as semantically related, although neighborhoods derived from input embeddings may not reflect content relationships. Neighborhood-based dimensionality reduction (DR) methods can propagate this limitation by optimizing layouts from embedding-based neighborhood graphs. We propose Knowledge-Guided Neighborhood Graph Construction (KGN), which represents relational knowledge derived from each instance as a set of knowledge graph (KG) triples. It uses the degree of triple sharing as pairwise semantic evidence to adjust embedding distances and reconstruct the top-k neighborhood graph; neither KG extraction nor neighborhood construction uses class labels. We also introduce IDProfile (IDP), which interprets residual mismatches by independently assessing whether the source content supports the assigned class label and the neighborhood-majority class. Across eight text and image dataset-encoder conditions, we characterize KGN over the full guidance-strength sweep and four KG similarity measures. Across this sweep, the maximum NMI and LT_2D each exceed the corresponding kNN baseline in all eight conditions, with the largest gains reaching 0.68 and 1.35, respectively. The gains and the extent of neighborhood reconfiguration vary across conditions and are larger under encoder conditions with lower kNN baseline scores. The IDP analysis shows that the largest reductions are concentrated in Placement Issue candidates, whereas Label Issue and Unresolved Case instances account for a larger share of the remaining review set. These results indicate that KGN can narrow the evaluated gap between embedding-based neighborhoods and content-supported semantic relations, while IDP shows that a residual mismatch should not automatically be interpreted as a projection failure.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07246
PDF
-
TerminalWorld: Benchmarking Agents on Real-World Terminal Tasks
2026-11-04 23:26:30Zhaoyang Chu, Jiarui Hu, Xingyu Jiang, Pengyu Zou, Han Li, Chao Peng, Peter O'Hearn, Earl T. Barr, Mark Harman, Federica Sarro, He YeAbstract
We introduce TerminalWorld, a scalable data engine that automatically reverse-engineers high-fidelity evaluation tasks from "in-the-wild" terminal recordings. Processing 80,870 terminal recordings, the engine yields a full benchmark of 1,530 validated tasks, spanning 18 real-world categories, ranging from short everyday operations to workflows exceeding 50 steps, and covering 1,280 unique commands. From these, we curate a Verified subset of 200 diverse, manually reviewed tasks. Comprehensive benchmarking on TerminalWorld-Verified across eight frontier models and six agents reveals that current systems still struggle with authentic terminal workflows, achieving a maximum pass rate of only 62.5%. Moreover, TerminalWorld captures real-world terminal capabilities distinct from existing expert-curated benchmarks (e.g., Terminal-Bench), with only a weak correlation to their scores (Pearson r=0.20). The automated engine makes TerminalWorld authentic and scalable by construction, enabling it to evaluate agents in real-world terminal environments as developer practices evolve.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.22535
PDF
-
BEAKER: An Expert-Curated Benchmark for Embodied Brains in Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories
2026-11-04 18:57:17Fei Lin, Tengchao Zhang, Ziyang Gong, Xiaotong Yu, Bohan Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Qihao Yang, Ji Dai, Dong Li, Yining Jiang, Qinghua Ni, Jun Huang, Qiang Zhang, Yue Zhou, Zhihang Zhong, Yonglin Tian, Fei-Yue Wang, Xue YangAbstract
Self-Driving Chemical Laboratories (SDCLs) are moving chemical experimentation toward embodied automation, where machines must perceive laboratory scenes, reason about experimental states, and act under physical, procedural, and safety constraints. Although Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are increasingly considered as embodied brains for such systems, existing laboratory benchmarks mainly focus on safety, anomaly detection, or general scientific understanding, leaving their execution-oriented embodied capabilities underexplored. To fill this gap, we introduce BEAKER, a Benchmark for evaluating Embodied Actionability, Knowledge, Experimentation, and Reasoning in SDCLs. BEAKER contains 1,000 expert-curated question-answer samples across 11 image and video task types, covering key judgments required for chemical laboratory execution, including affordance grounding, trajectory planning, equipment, state, and safety recognition, apparatus setup, operation and step reasoning, and temporal procedure reasoning. All questions and annotations are manually created and reviewed by chemistry and embodied Artificial Intelligence (AI) experts, without AI-assisted generation or annotation. We evaluate 28 general-purpose, science-oriented, chemistry-specialized, and embodied MLLMs in an offline, single-turn setting. Results show that current models can follow coarse experimental procedures in videos, but still struggle to ground actions into operable regions and feasible trajectories, to recognize fine-grained laboratory apparatus, states, and safety norms, and to order steps in mid-length procedures. BEAKER thus reveals a clear gap between coarse procedural understanding and the precise, action-grounded perception required for laboratory execution, providing a diagnostic benchmark for future MLLMs in SDCLs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06911
PDF
-
FrontierPhysics: Evaluating Agents for End-to-End Physics Research
2026-11-04 18:56:22Bingran You, Wenjun Ke, Ria Rosenauer, Bo Liu, Wenbo Chen, Min Chen, Shuqi Xu, Yue Ma, Jiechao Feng, Bo Chen, Xiangkai Sun, Jiarui Liu, Jinen Guo, Zeyu Zhou, Xu Huang, Zhuohan Li, Haoyu Li, Heguang Lin, Lijie Ding, Yadong Zeng, Kangqi Zhang, Xinge Liu, Hanwen Liu, Zhenghong Li, Alexander von Recum, Yuchen Zhu, Felix Schwarzfischer, Yizhou Zhao, Jicheng Wang, Binxu Li, Qian Yu, Chan Li, Cheng Dai, Di Wang, Haoyu Zhang, Jiankai Sun, Kaituo Feng, Mian Qin, Ruihong Yin, Yiqun Luo, Weiwei Wu, Shihong Pan, Tsung Yeh Hsieh, Xiao Huang, Yan Zhang, Sihan Li, Zirui Ren, Zengji Tu, Kyoung Whan Choe, Ke Sun, Vincenzo Galia, Vaisakhi Mishra, Jiashu He, Hongyang Wang, Zhiheng Yang, Shubham Gaur, Yifan Gu, Shuyi Wang, Zihao Zuo, Steven Dillmann, Yiyou Sun, Xinyang Han, Hanchung Lee, Molei Tao, Yue Zhao, Shilong Liu, Yuchen Wu, Xuandong Zhao, Xiangyi Li, Florian Brand, Gerbrand Ceder, Hartmut HaeffnerAbstract
AI agents are playing an increasingly important role in physics research. However, existing physics benchmarks only evaluate fixed questions, isolated sub-tasks, or paper reproduction with given solutions, and rarely check research quality alongside correctness. We introduce FrontierPhysics, an end-to-end benchmark with 56 tasks made by 42 physicists based on their own research, covering nine domains across theoretical, computational, and experimental physics. Each task requires agents to review the literature, develop a research plan, conduct research and experiments, and produce structured outputs and scientific manuscripts. Combining deterministic verifiers with expert-authored rubrics, FrontierPhysics evaluates whether agents' research is correct and publishable. Across 22 models in 26 configurations, no configuration passes more than 46 of its 168 rollouts. Manual review of agent trajectories shows that frontier agents' main weaknesses are insufficiently rigorous reasoning and limited expert intuition, rather than gaps in physics knowledge or execution errors.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06910
PDF
-
LongBanana: An Expert-Verified Benchmark for Long-Context Multi-Reference Image Synthesis
2026-11-04 18:11:56Haoxiang Cao, Yuxuan Zhang, Penghui Du, Bo Li, Jiajiong Cao, Yingying Fan, Zimeng Wu, Yifu Luo, Mingzhe Zheng, Junwen Miao, Huaisong Zhang, Yang Yao, Yu Wang, Dongfu Jiang, Ping Nie, Wenhu Chen, Chaoqun Wang, Changqian Yu, Kelsey R. AllenAbstract
We introduce LongBanana, to our knowledge the first expert-designed and expert-verified benchmark for long-context multi-reference image synthesis in the age of agent-driven image generation. The task requires retrieving dispersed visual evidence, rejecting distractors, binding entities and relations, and composing one coherent final image from multiple references. LongBanana contains 90 carefully designed tasks organized by a 3-by-3 taxonomy; each task includes about 32 reference images, 20 constraints, and 50 evaluation items, yielding 4,670 expert-specified atomic evaluation items in total. Its graph-grounded evaluation design instantiates each task with reference images and an entity-relation graph, then converts node, edge, and whole-graph obligations into checklist items for Content Fidelity, Relational Binding, and Global Constraint Satisfaction. Reviewed expert labels include a 15% double-labeled subset with 89.4% exact agreement and 0.83 quadratic weighted kappa. We further introduce LongBanana-Gen, an agent-harness framework for long-horizon image generation; experiments show that minimal agent harnesses improve over direct generation, while a ReAct-Plan-Exec-Reflect (RPR) workflow yields harness-dependent gains by strengthening evidence grounding and repair. Together, LongBanana provides an auditable testbed for measuring dense visual evidence use and a shared target for developing stronger agent-driven image-generation systems. Code and data are available at the project page: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06856
PDF
-
Resolve, Clear, or Defer: Training-Free Active Prototype Triage for Ecological Detection Pipelines
2026-11-04 18:07:36Anirudh Potlapally, Brijesh Nanda Brunda Yogananda, Jianyang Gu, Maanav Jajodia, Luke Meyers, Wei-Lun Chao, Hari SubramoniAbstract
Ecological monitoring increasingly relies on camera traps and aerial surveys that generate large image collections. High-recall animal detectors can localize candidate animals at scale. However, they also produce many detections that still require expert review, including false positives, ambiguous cases, and animals difficult to identify at the species level. Since exhaustive review requires substantial effort, we propose training-free active prototype triage, where reviewed detections become reusable evidence to (1) Resolve supported foreground classes, (2) Clear likely background false positives, or (3) Defer insufficiently supported cases for expert review. Across camera-trap and aerial datasets, foreground recognition and false-positive rejection benefit from different pretrained representations: BioCLIP2 provides foreground evidence while DINOv3 provides background evidence, reducing erroneous foreground clearing while improving automatic foreground recovery. Deferring unsupported cases avoids the higher error rates caused by forced decisions. Compared with confidence-thresholded multiclass k-NN and uncertainty-sampling logistic regression, prototype triage improves foreground recovery while maintaining competitive or lower review burden. Acquisition goes beyond class discovery: even after classes are represented, prototype choice determines how reliably evidence propagates through the remaining detections. Our results suggest that once animal localization reaches high recall, the challenge shifts from finding animals to deciding which examples to review, how to reuse them, and when evidence does not support an automatic decision.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.01466
PDF
-
ConceptARC at Scale: Studying Conceptual Understanding in Reasoning Models
2026-11-04 16:17:36Philipp Mondorf, Adrien Deli\`ege, Solim LeGris, Claas Beger, Ryan Yi, Barbara Plank, Brenden M. Lake, Todd M. GureckisAbstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs) perform well on challenging benchmarks, yet it remains unclear whether they form generalizable abstractions across conceptually related reasoning tasks. The Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) provides a controlled testbed for studying abstraction, requiring solvers to infer transformation rules over two-dimensional grids from a small set of examples. While ARC evaluates rule abstraction within individual tasks, different tasks may share higher-level structure despite requiring different transformations$\unicode{x2014}$for example, several tasks may involve reasoning about objects contained within other objects. Benchmarks such as ConceptARC capture this structure by grouping ARC-style tasks into recurring spatial and semantic concepts, but they often contain only a few manually constructed tasks per concept. We introduce ConceptARC at Scale, a generator for creating thousands of ARC-style tasks targeting a specific concept. Using this generator, we construct ConceptARC-100, a dataset of 1,600 new, manually reviewed tasks, with 100 tasks for each of the 16 concepts defined by ConceptARC$\unicode{x2014}$ten times the size of the original benchmark. We evaluate a range of recent LRMs and models trained from scratch on ConceptARC-100 to characterize which concepts they solve reliably and where they struggle. We further analyze the models' internal representations and find clear semantic structure: task representations cluster according to the operations applied to objects, such as recoloring, removal, or translation, even when realized through substantially different rules and scenarios. Together, our results suggest that models form stable abstractions of transformation operations that generalize across diverse tasks.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06732
PDF
-
Dexterous Robotic Hands in the Foundation-Model Era: A Full-Stack Survey of Hardware, Data, Cross-Embodiment Transfer, Learning, and Evaluation
2026-11-04 16:13:29Ji PeiAbstract
Dexterous robotic hands are increasingly coupled to large-scale human data and foundation models, yet progress in hardware, representation learning and evaluation is often assessed separately. This survey reviews work from January 2024 to early November 2026, with earlier studies included to establish technical lineages. We organize the literature into five interdependent layers: hardware; data collection and curation; cross-embodiment transfer; learning and foundation models; and evaluation and applications. Human hand-object understanding and tactile sensing provide two cross-cutting perspectives. A system-level architecture, comparative tables and five case analyses connect design choices across these layers. We distinguish within-study experimental comparisons from heterogeneous corpus statistics, vendor specifications and company-reported results. Three conclusions emerge. First, the value of human data depends on kinematic, visual and contact alignment, not recording volume alone. Second, shared action representations and foundation policies do not remove embodiment-specific constraints on force, latency and contact. Third, task completion is insufficient to establish physical correctness or deployment readiness. Evidence remains limited for zero-shot transfer of contact-rich skills between morphologically different hands, long-duration reliability, and cross-sensor tactile generalization. We identify eleven open problems and propose reporting interfaces and controlled comparisons that can make full-stack progress more measurable. The review is a structured narrative synthesis rather than a pooled performance ranking or an exhaustive systematic review.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06724
PDF
-
Beyond accuracy: what AI assurance needs to establish in public services
2026-11-04 15:31:51Louise YorkeAbstract
Public bodies increasingly rely on AI-produced evidence, including classifications, summaries and assessments. These outputs can inform policy decisions and service delivery, making their reliability a matter of public accountability. Establishing whether this evidence can be relied upon requires testing its outputs and examining how organisations decide whether those tests are sufficient. We combine technical evaluation with analysis of AI governance requirements, informed by measurement theory and management-based regulation. We compare eight GPT-4o configurations classifying 1,200 UK Prime Minister's Questions into 21 policy topics, against human-coded labels and across unchanged repeats. Accuracy ranges from 68.2% to 70.3%, yet 24.3% of questions receive different labels, with changes in topic shares and rankings. Configurations agree more with one another than with human coding: agreement does not guarantee correctness. Under the implemented score-extraction procedure, the proportion flagged for human review ranges from 0.9% to 41.0%. We analyse 37 UK and EU policy documents. Both sets expect testing and oversight, but reporting expectations do not consistently cover changing answers, shared errors, selective evaluation, substantive conclusions or review routing. Some UK guidance explicitly addresses stability. The UK sample emphasises public bodies checking their own use; the EU places substantial testing duties on providers while leaving them important choices about measures and acceptance thresholds. Without appropriate checks, evidence could misrepresent policy issues, redirect attention or resources, and leave errors undetected. Public policy should require organisations to justify reliance through checks beyond aggregate accuracy, clear responsibility, access to expertise and scrutiny of results.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06655
PDF
-
Does Frontier AI Strengthen Cyber Defense? Evidence from Project Glasswing
Abstract
Defenders and attackers race to find the same software flaws. I use the launch of Project Glasswing, which gave a small group of large US tech firms early access to Claude Mythos Preview, a model for finding software vulnerabilities, to study how access to frontier AI affects defenders, external researchers, and attackers. Using the universe of publicly disclosed vulnerabilities, I find that firms with access more than doubled their disclosures relative to Chinese and Russian tech firms without access, disclosed about 150 percent more high-impact vulnerabilities, and fixed reported flaws as quickly as before. As treated firms found more flaws themselves, external researchers, who sell their findings through bug bounties, reported about half as many vulnerabilities in treated firms' code and more in other firms' code, without leaving the market. There is no evidence that attackers exploited the additional vulnerabilities: the share exploited within a month of disclosure fell by about two thirds, mainly because a smaller share was already exploited when disclosed, while the number exploited did not change. Frontier AI helped defenders find and fix more flaws before attackers exploited them, but its restricted release creates an asymmetry in software security between firms in different countries.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06629
PDF
-
From Certified Pairs to a Certified Hub: Reasoner-Checked Crosswalks for the Information Exchange Standard
Abstract
A national digital twin was conceived as an ecosystem of twins connected through mappings to a common foundation, but the roadmap that promises to confirm those mappings are valid never says what valid means. We give the test a precise form, coherence and conservativity of the merged ontology, borrowed from logic-based alignment repair, and apply it to the Information Exchange Standard (IES), first pair by pair and then to whole hubs. Crosswalks from IES into thirteen ontologies across seven sector groups, anchored on the building ontologies BOT, Brick, and SAREF4BLDG, pass through separate stages of matching, human review, certification of each SKOS correspondence against the two class hierarchies, and reasoning with HermiT. Pair by pair, the stages catch different failures: certification alone removed all 526 conservativity violations of the raw crosswalks, review alone left 73, and together they made eleven of twelve overlapping pairs coherent and conservative. Pairwise certification does not compose. Merging the three certified building crosswalks into one hub made five Brick classes unsatisfiable, through a homonym between the IES and Brick notions of a floor that only BOT's disjointness axioms expose; rejecting that one row gave a coherent and conservative hub that entails 290 cross-ontology links nobody wrote down. The core hub is inconsistent before any crosswalk is added, because two published standards, the Open Energy Ontology and BFO 2020, contradict each other; with either one left out it is coherent and conservative. A hub, not a pair, is the unit an ecosystem of twins has to certify.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06628
PDF
-
ElecLoad: Adaptive Electricity Load Forecasting Guided by Multiple Events
2026-11-04 13:38:13Huajian Zhang, Mingyue Cheng, Xingpeng Gao, Xiaoyu Tao, Zhiding Liu, Jiqian Yang, Zhi LiAbstract
Accurate electricity load forecasting provides critical decision support for energy procurement, generation scheduling, and supply-demand balancing, contributing to the economic efficiency and operational reliability of power systems. However, future electricity demand can be affected by the complex interplay of multiple events described in Web notices, weather alerts, and event schedules. Their effects vary over time and can reinforce or offset one another, making electricity load difficult to forecast accurately. While existing methods can incorporate context as additional input, how to use the effects of multiple events and their interactions to guide the load forecasting process itself remains to be explored. To address this gap, we propose ElecLoad, a context-aware agent for multi-event electricity load forecasting that adaptively organizes the forecasting process. Specifically, we train ElecLoad to combine historical load with context to analyze each event's relevance to the target load, the timing of its effects, and potential interactions among events. Guided by this analysis, ElecLoad adaptively chooses to forecast the entire forecast horizon directly or to partition it into segments according to changes in event effects. When the horizon is partitioned, sub-agents independently generate initial forecasts for each segment. The main agent then reviews these forecasts, and the sub-agents perform selective refinement guided by its feedback. Experiments on multiple electricity load datasets show that ElecLoad achieves state-of-the-art performance in most evaluation scenarios. Code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06508
PDF
-
Myoelectric Control for Upper-Limb Exoskeletons: A Decoder-Shaper-Controller Framework, Design Guidelines, and Future Directions
2026-11-04 12:12:44Davide Costanzi, Eldison Dimo, Emanuele Feola, Mario Sedilesu, Francesco Pascucci, Andrea CalancaAbstract
Myoelectric Control Systems (MCSs) enable voluntary control of wearable robots through muscle activity. However, intention decoding, assistance shaping, and low-level actuator control are often not explicitly distinguished, making their contributions difficult to evaluate and compare. This review introduces a functional decoder-shaper-controller framework for continuous myoelectric control of upper-limb exoskeletons. The decoder estimates an intention-related variable from surface electromyography (sEMG), the shaper maps it to a control reference according to an assistance policy, and the controller realizes that reference through actuator control. This decomposition separates intention estimation from assistance-policy design and enables comparison of heterogeneous architectures. Representative approaches are critically examined in terms of module design, calibration, and evaluation. The analysis highlights that the shaper, despite determining the magnitude and shape of assistance, lacks established design and tuning methodologies and is often embedded within the decoder or controller. Key open issues include inconsistent reporting of assistance levels, limited use of interaction-aware stability and passivity tools, and insufficient validation across degrees of freedom, users, and tasks. Building on these findings, this review provides design guidelines for systematic module-wise tuning and identifies future research priorities to bridge the gap between accurate intention decoding and safe, effective, and generalizable assistance under real-world operating conditions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.03418
PDF
-
Training-Free Character-Length Control in Summarization with Diffusion Language Models
2026-11-04 11:32:20Steffen Castle, Nils Feldhus, Christopher Ebert, Leonhard Hennig, Sebastian M\"ollerAbstract
Summarization with a fixed character length is important for tasks such as headline and article preview generation, where text must fit an exact space. Autoregressive language models (LMs) struggle with precise character-length control: training-based methods require task-specific fine-tuning, while zero-shot prompting strategies achieve only approximate compliance. We propose DELTA (Diffusion Expected Length Targeting Algorithm), a training-free inference-time method for masked diffusion LMs that estimates expected character length at each denoising step and dynamically inserts or removes masked positions to steer toward a target length. DELTA requires no fine-tuning and is designed for off-the-shelf masked diffusion LMs. Across three summarization benchmarks, it reduces character-length errors by an order of magnitude compared to baselines while maintaining competitive summary quality in both automatic and human evaluation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06371
PDF
