Abstract
Floorplanning is an early step in turning a logical circuit into a physical chip: it positions large circuit modules and constrains the space available for subsequent logic placement and wiring. These decisions affect congestion and timing, but their physical consequences emerge through downstream implementation. For AI agents, the task requires translating engineering constraints into spatial decisions whose quality cannot be judged by successful tool execution alone. We present an evaluation framework that connects submitted layouts to a prescribed downstream implementation flow, checks geometric validity, measures physical quality, and reports resource use. On one industrial design whose 99 macros occupy approximately 71\% of a fixed L-shaped layout region, we compare our specialized system Nova-SI with general-purpose engineering agents and agents restricted to file access, obtaining complete physical measurements for 39 layout outputs. Under our 0--100 composite quality score, Nova-SI achieves a mean of 57.97 without online feedback from the prescribed power-grid and placement evaluation, compared with 31.17 for the strongest measured general-purpose configuration, GPT-6 Astra. The difference is supported by raw congestion and timing measurements and persists across scoring-sensitivity checks. Layout-level analysis further shows that similar global utilization can conceal substantially different local congestion. Together, the protocol and case study assess agents through the physical consequences of their delivered layouts and provide evidence about system performance on this industrial instance.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.12048
