Abstract
We describe the RMIT-ADM+S team's participation in the TREC 2026 Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) track using the ClimbMix corpus. We submitted seven research-agent runs using proprietary OpenAI and open-weight models, exploring different retrieval strategies, writer models, and agent workflows. Pre-submission ablations identified writer selection and adjacent-chunk expansion as the main factors affecting answer quality. In the official NIST evaluation, six of seven runs exceeded the track median across all three rubric/nugget collections. Our best-performing run, brief-hybrid, achieved the highest all-item coverage among our submissions and tied the track maximum (0.892) for Batch-1 vital coverage. Human side-by-side preferences differed across evaluation batches: the open-weight owa-glm5 led Batch 1 despite lower automated coverage, while sol-research-first led Batch 2. These findings highlight differences between automated coverage measures and human preferences, as well as the potential of lower-cost open-weight models for research-agent systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.16425
