Abstract
Subsurface schematisation supports geotechnical decisions but remains challenging because sparse site-investigation data leave substantial gaps in information about ground conditions. This study explores TabPFN, a foundation model pretrained on general synthetic tabular data, for this task. Using only grid coordinates and soil behaviour type index observations from sparse cone penetration tests (CPTs), we first reconstruct two-dimensional sections without geotechnical fine-tuning or predefined layer boundaries. We evaluate the approach on synthetic sections and at two field sites in the Netherlands, comparing it with SchemaGAN, a conditional generative adversarial network trained on synthetic geotechnical sections, and with reference interpolation methods. In the baseline comparisons, TabPFN achieved mean errors close to SchemaGAN's on synthetic sections and lower mean errors at both field sites. On synthetic sections, TabPFN's mean absolute error decreased at each tested increase in CPT count, and, under the baseline input setting, its pointwise prediction intervals had mean coverage close to nominal levels. Subsequent fine-tuning on the synthetic sections used to train SchemaGAN improved synthetic test accuracy but increased mean errors at both field sites. These findings indicate that general-purpose tabular foundation models offer a promising route for updating subsurface predictions from sparse and evolving site-investigation data without retraining.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.16088
