Paper Reading AI Learner

DuoJEPA: Cross-Modal Translation Between Unaligned Self-Supervised Embedding Spaces

2026-11-11 20:10:52
Mahmut S. Gokmen, Mitchell A. Klusty, Evan W. Damron, Caroline N. Leach, Samuel E. Armstrong, V. K. Cody Bumgardner

Abstract

Learning from paired modalities is commonly equated with aligning them: two encoders are trained until the embeddings of a pair coincide in a shared space. We study whether cross-modal retrieval and classification can instead be obtained while the two encoders' own embedding spaces remain directly unaligned. DuoJEPA trains one encoder per modality with the self-supervised LeJEPA objective and appends to each encoder a single transformer layer that translates its embedding into the other encoder's space, supervised by a contrastive objective computed entirely within that target space. No loss term compares the two own spaces directly, although the encoders are optimised jointly through the translation objective. In our experiments, the translator's residual connections determine where the cross-modal pressure is absorbed: with a residual translator the two encoders become directly aligned, whereas with a skipless (residual-free) translator a paired-cosine test detects no alignment in the final models, and at most a weak one in the ablations, at comparable cross-modal performance. The learned class-token translation is well approximated by a single scaled rotation of the source space. We evaluate DuoJEPA on two modality pairs that differ in nearly every respect. On chest radiographs and reports from CheXpert Plus, it attains a zero-shot AUC of 86.6 and a cross-modal retrieval score of 78.5, compared with 60.0 and 64.2 for our reimplementation of LeVLJEPA with the same encoders and data. On Sentinel-2 optical and Sentinel-1 radar imagery, the frozen encoders fall within the range of published Sentinel foundation models under our reproduction of the Copernicus-Bench linear-probe protocol, the translator retrieves the paired image of the other sensor among 4,000 candidates in 77-79% of cases, and a patch-level extension transfers the within-image similarity structure of the scene.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15968

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.15968.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot