Abstract
LLM applications increasingly rely on translators and compatibility layers to move conversations across APIs. Yet a translated request can be accepted by the target API while silently losing information about instruction roles, tool interactions, error states, or generation controls. We introduce isloss, a deterministic oracle for testing conversation-information preservation across LLM API translations. It maps source and translated requests and replies to a shared intermediate representation, ConvIR, and applies explicit rules to distinguish legitimate representation changes from information loss. Unlike schema validation or reference-based differential testing, isloss requires neither a reference translation nor additional model calls. It also distinguishes avoidable loss from degradation caused by target API limitations. We evaluate isloss using specification-based fault injection, human review, and experiments on translators, gateways, and client libraries. On held-out tests, it detects 95/125 planted faults (76.0%) with 2/100 false alarms (2.0%). Across a synthetic request suite spanning six configurations of five translator codebases, 127/685 completed translations (18.5%) pass static target checks while silently changing prompt, role, or tool information in ways the target API could have preserved. In translated replies, 203/558 streams (36.4%) cause exceptions or silent corruption in at least one tested official OpenAI SDK. Targeted experiments across six models show that translation-induced changes can alter model behaviour when tasks depend on the affected information. These results establish conversation preservation as a distinct correctness requirement for reliable LLM interoperability, agent execution, and model evaluation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15543
