Abstract
Optional reasoning, retrieval, web search, and tool use can improve large language model responses but incur unnecessary computation when activated indiscriminately. This study investigates whether prompt optimization can compensate for limited router capacity and whether classification gains translate into downstream efficiency. The proposed framework uses prompt-driven small language models to make four independent capability decisions, allowing multiple capabilities to be selected per query. Qwen2.5 routers ranging from 1.5B to 14B parameters are compared across five prompting strategies, followed by an evaluation of capability-specific optimized configurations using a fixed GPT-OSS-120B downstream model on 127 questions. Under minimal prompting, increasing router capacity does not consistently improve classification performance. Prompt optimization narrows the capacity gap for reasoning and calculator routing, whereas RAG and web search retain larger benefits from higher capacity. Similar classification F1 scores do not necessarily imply equivalent downstream behavior: false-positive activations increase unnecessary computation, while missed capabilities can reduce answer quality. The 14B router achieves a mean BERTScore F1 of 0.8408, compared with 0.8418 when all capabilities are enabled, while reducing average downstream token consumption by 68.7\% (8,837 to 2,764 tokens) and median downstream latency by 80.5\% (9.79 to 1.91 seconds). These savings exclude router overhead, which is measured separately in a different inference environment and increases with router capacity. The findings demonstrate that the relationship between router capacity, prompt design, and downstream efficiency is capability-dependent. Consequently, router selection must consider error profiles and routing overhead alongside classification performance.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.16414
