Abstract
Generative AI agents are increasingly being embedded into visualization systems that can search data, invoke tools, summarize evidence, and produce recommendations. However, when agents rely solely on their own knowledge, the visualization problem is not only whether the agent provides a useful answer, but also whether users can inspect how that answer is grounded. We present Food Critic, an agentic visualization system for diners' restaurant decision support that integrates public health inspection records with crowd review data. The system grounds agents under three conditions: a database-only ReAct agent, a retrieval- augmented agent with access to food-safety regulations, and an ontology-guided agent that produces structured hypotheses and typed evidence. Food Critic externalizes the agent's reasoning within these groundings as inspectable visual evidence. We evaluate LLM models with several use cases under each grounding of our agentic system. Our work positions restaurant choice as a concrete case for studying human-agent collaboration, visual provenance of agent reasoning, and the design of visual interfaces for grounded GenAI decision support.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.15843
