Abstract
Agentic AI systems increasingly undertake extended tasks and act on people's behalf, making human-agent interaction central to their effectiveness. Successful interaction requires understanding human perspectives, coordinating complementary capabilities, and maintaining productive relationships within socio-technical environments. This paper examines how foundations developed by the Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS) community inform these demands. We consider interactions ranging from individual human-agent partnerships to teams and larger groups, where participants differ in their roles, decision authority, capabilities, and objectives. We organize computational approaches around the connected challenges of understanding others and deciding how to interact with them. Theory of Mind, belief-desire-intention architectures, goal and plan recognition, inverse planning, and recursive reasoning provide mechanisms for representing and inferring partially observable mental states. Observer-aware planning, model reconciliation, and decision-theoretic communication connect these inferences to action, explanation, and information exchange. Together with shared autonomy, argumentation, and cooperative inverse reinforcement learning, these approaches offer foundations for agentic systems that account for evolving human knowledge, intentions, and expectations. We argue that progress requires treating human interaction as an ongoing decision problem shaped by uncertainty, interdependence, and potentially conflicting objectives.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.14846
