Paper Reading AI Learner

Effects of Laser Beam Width and Measurement Noise on Tree Diameter Estimation in Laser Scanning

2026-11-10 08:40:16
Jesse Muhojoki, Nuutti Ervasti, Eric Hyypp\"a, Aapo Erkkil\"a, Eppu Honkanen, Tuomas Yrttimaa, Mikko Vastaranta, Juha Hyypp\"a

Abstract

Laser scanning has been utilized for decades to measure tree structure and geometry. Despite continuous advances in sensor technology, uncertainties arising from scanner characteristics and measurement conditions has remained relevant sources of error. In particular, factors such as laser beam diameter can introduce both systematic and random errors in the reconstructed tree geometry. This study investigates the main sources of these errors in mobile laser scanning (MLS) and quantifies their effects on stem curve (stem diameter) estimation. We discovered through simulations and experiments that the heteroscedasticity (difference in variance in ranging and scan angle) in the measurement noise is a key factor along with the beam width of the lidar, which cause the bias of the diameter estimates to depend not only on distance, but also on the tree diameter. We demonstrated that this bias can be reliably predicted and negated for trees with a diameter at the breast height greater than 10 cm using technical specifications of the sensor without any additional calibration. In experiments, the proposed bias compensation method reduced the root-mean-square error of stem diameter estimates to sub-centimeter level on boreal forest test sites. However, for small trees with diameter below 10 cm, the diameter bias becomes sensitive to the diameter of the tree$\unicode{x2013}$an unknown factor$\unicode{x2013}$and other factors, such as different bark and out-of-roundness of the stem, limiting the precision of lidar for measuring geometry of trees and applicability of the presented method.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13739

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.13739.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot