Abstract
Post-placement timing and power co-optimization is critical to meeting setup timing targets and reducing power within placement constraints. A cell replacement can improve timing along one path while increasing power or reducing slack on others. Conventional optimizers follow fixed rules for scheduling and accepting repairs, limiting their ability to address design-specific bottlenecks. A large language model (LLM) can propose changes to these rules, but on its own it cannot reliably estimate how a cell replacement affects endpoint slack and power. TAPCO-G combines LLM-guided optimizer adaptation with graph-based physical priors to evaluate candidate cell replacements. The outer loop tunes tool settings using physical-design feedback and revises executable repair policies when tuning stalls. The inner loop anchors delay estimates to static timing analysis snapshots, accounts for upstream driver-load changes, and propagates delay shifts to timing endpoints. It combines these estimates with coarse-to-fine power screening to prioritize candidates for physical trials. TAPCO-G produced placement-legal, logic-equivalent implementations and outscored CERBERUS on all eight ASAP7 benchmarks from the MLCAD 2026 Contest, with a mean quality score gain of 5.516 points, and scored 21.648 points higher than TAPCO on average. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed co-optimization framework.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13931
