Abstract
Evaluating a learned AC optimal power flow (AC-OPF) surrogate on one grid serialization cannot show whether its accuracy depends on that encoding. We test this dependence with thirteen metamorphic relations, each specifying when a transformation is valid and how to compare its outputs. Our audit covers 17 model and pipeline configurations: two released trained checkpoints and 15 random-weight architecture or mechanism controls. Every configuration violates at least six relations, even at reporting tolerances ten times tighter or looser. For GridSFM-Open v1.1, source inspection and intermediate-tensor interventions point to an indexing bug and three noncanonical or numerically unstable preprocessing choices; a repaired checkpoint remains untested. In a separate case500 training experiment, augmentation lowers transformed-view error in three of four models and median discrepancy and constraint-violation P95 in all four. These benefits depend on the training protocol: some relations worsen, and every evaluated prediction remains AC infeasible. A GPU/CPU eigensolver mismatch accounts for most of the large raw-Laplacian-baseline gain. We recommend reporting representation consistency alongside accuracy, feasibility, and cost. These results establish neither deployment readiness nor universal invariance.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13566
