Abstract
Edge NPU performance depends not only on hardware capabilities, but also on model transformation and the overall deployment pipeline. We propose a benchmarking methodology that separates these effects by comparing three configurations: Baseline, Vendor Guided NPU Only (VG-NPU), and Vendor Guided End-to-End (VG-E2E), where VG-NPU preserves common model I/O and host-side processing while VG-E2E follows the vendor-native deployment pipeline. We apply this methodology to four edge NPUs and three vision workloads. VG-NPU improves both accuracy and Runtime-call latency in 10 of 12 NPU--workload combinations, whereas VG-E2E reduces System-level latency in all combinations but improves accuracy in only four. Moreover, NPU-level performance rankings do not always match End-to-End rankings, and VG-E2E provides an additional 10.4--70.7\% reduction in System-level latency over VG-NPU. These results demonstrate the importance of evaluating vendor-guided optimization separately at the controlled model-transformation and full deployment levels when comparing heterogeneous commercial Edge NPU platforms in practice.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.13563
