Paper Reading AI Learner

How Small Can We Go? Calibrating Activation-Cache Compression for SAE Training

2026-11-05 10:09:19
Abraham Yeung

Abstract

To train a sparse autoencoder (SAE), you need a massive cache of model activations. We look into the effects that compression has on an SAE in two ways: we keep the original fp32-trained SAE and pass the compressed cache into the same SAE to see how many feature activations stay the same (the frozen-SAE test), and we retrain an SAE on the compressed cache and see how many of the original features still exist (the retraining test). We found that in the retraining test, there is no clear scale for retained features. On a GPT-2 cache, rounding everything to fp16 keeps 60.6% of features, but changing one value in a million by the smallest step fp32 allows (a change eight orders of magnitude smaller) keeps only 70.5%. Meanwhile, changing the random seed keeps 23.0%. For the frozen-SAE test, the frozen SAE's correlation with the original increases in order of how precise the codecs are, but plain $L_2$ distance gives nearly the same ordering. We also see the same frozen reading correspond to different percentages retained at different sites. This leaves the question of the right measurement. We build one by calibrating: retraining on identical bytes sets the ceiling, and a reseed sets the floor. We then measure the effect of each compressed codec against its own site's floor. With TopK SAEs on GPT-2 small and Pythia-1.4B at research-scale budgets, naïve per-token int4 loses more features than a reseed everywhere we tested, as do PCA and random projection on GPT-2. Standardizing each channel before quantizing brings int4 back above the floor in terms of retained features, at the same raw file size. At our smallest budget, a bf16 forward pass, which some pipelines use to save memory, loses slightly more features than rotated 8-bit storage. Calibrating a site costs four training runs and two evaluation passes.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08551

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.08551.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot