Paper Reading AI Learner

CoMET: Tracking the Shared Pose Error of Roadside Messages for Asynchronous Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Detection

2026-11-06 07:59:24
Shuwei Sun, Jian Huang, Hui Cao

Abstract

A roadside sensor can detect vehicles hidden from the ego vehicle, but a pose error shifts every detection in the same message. We study asynchronous vehicle-infrastructure cooperative 3D detection on V2X-Seq using only information available at decision time, without ground truth, future frames, or per-pair calibration offsets at inference. Objects seen by both sensors reveal the shared translation, but even at zero added delay, 38% of validation messages have no matched pair. We propose CoMET (Common-Mode Error Tracking), which estimates this translation over time. At each message arrival, CoMET matches vehicle and roadside detections, estimates the offset from mutually nearest pairs, and updates a Kalman filter for that sender. When no pair matches, the filter carries its estimate forward. The correction applies to all roadside boxes, including those unseen by the ego vehicle. The estimator has no learned parameters; a separate frozen head ranks the merged detections. Across four delays from 0 to 400 ms on 21 validation sequences, CoMET averages 66.63 bird's-eye-view AP at IoU 0.7, compared with 63.18 for the same late fusion using uncorrected online poses and 62.96 for the best intermediate-fusion baseline. Across five detectors from three architectures, CoMET gains 2.2 to 3.5 AP points over online poses and 0.3 to 0.6 over estimating the offset from the current message alone. We find that the benchmark uses a zero offset as a placeholder in 28% of validation messages and that its offset search reaches the boundary in 45% of the rest. These offsets affect the labels for objects seen only from the roadside. Under two alternative label references, CoMET improves on uncorrected online poses in every evaluated population. Retraining intermediate fusion with CoMET poses and corrected labels improves detection on all three architectures tested, with statistically significant gains on two.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09121

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2611.09121.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot