Abstract
Decision-based sparse attacks must reduce perturbation support using only the victim's predicted label. The best restoration strategy varies as support contracts: coarse removal works early, while tail states need finer, history-aware tests. We propose RLGPA, an online reinforcement learning method that schedules support-reduction executors and their granularity under a hard query budget. A masked Dueling Double DQN selects among seven stable policy--scale actions; each action produces support-relative restoration groups that are rebuilt after every macro decision. A feasibility-preserving executor commits only adversarial restorations and feeds support gain and query cost back to the planner. Under the matched top-1-label oracle, RLGPA reaches 61\% targeted ASR at sparsity 0.01 on CIFAR-10 (vs. 25\% SparseEvo, 0\% Pointwise), and 75.5\%/73.0\% on ResNet50/ViT at sparsity 0.005 (vs. 29.0\%/15.5\%). A fixed-probe test reduces median \(L_0\) from 165 to 23 after 40 images without any update. State-blind and state-shuffled controls degrade significantly, confirming that the learned policy uses attack state; the main gains come from state-conditioned executor scheduling and dynamic repartition. The source code is publicly available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.07512
