Paper Reading AI Learner

Where the Real Clips Came From: Corpus Identity in AI-Generated Video Detection

2026-11-03 18:44:17
Mert Onur Cakiroglu, Zhihe Lu, Mehmet Dalkilic, Hasan Kurban

Abstract

Benchmarks for detecting AI-generated video take their real clips from a few curated collections, so a clip's label is collinear with where it came from. We call a score's dependence on this origin corpus identity, and we measure it on four benchmarks and six real collections. Three probes read a file's declared frame types, the motion vectors its codec stores, and the frames' appearance. Frame-type counts alone separate real from generated at AUC 0.999 on GenVidBench, and re-encoding every clip with one setting at a fixed length still leaves 0.61 to 0.63 on three benchmarks. We introduce a fixed frame-type pattern that removes this leak from every clip of at least 2 s. The same re-encode lowers the ReStraV detector on GenVidBench from 0.85 to 0.60, just above the 0.59 its features reach between two real collections, because its 8 fps repeats frames in real clips. Motion vectors alone separate real collections from one another at AUC 0.51 to 0.98, and only one benchmark ships the two labeled real sources needed to measure this separation within it. In deployment, with each threshold set to flag 5% of its training benchmark's real clips, the motion-vector and appearance probes and linear readouts on ReStraV and WaveRep features each flag 15% or more of another real collection. Choosing the threshold on real videos from the target collection brings the rate back to about 5%, at the cost of catching fewer generated clips. Clearing the real-vs-real level does not guarantee replication: of the six feature sets whose GenVidBench score clears it by 0.15 or more, only WaveRep's two keep their score on AIGVDBench. A benchmark score is therefore best read together with that level, a score on a second benchmark, and false-positive rates on other real collections. The toolkit and the clip lists of every evaluation set are at this https URL.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.31004

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.31004.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot