Abstract
Deep learning can classify crop diseases accurately from benchmark leaf images, but centralized training requires farms to share raw data, and predictions without explanations offer limited support for treatment decisions. We present FedXCrop, a federated crop disease classification pipeline that quantitatively evaluates explanations of the aggregated global model. A MobileNetV2 model trained centrally on PlantVillage achieved 99.38% test accuracy (standard deviation 0.05 over three seeds) on a fixed test set of 5,428 images across 38 classes. Federated models initialized with ImageNet weights were trained for 30 rounds across five clients. FedAvg achieved 98.81% accuracy with identically distributed clients and 98.81%, 98.59%, and 97.78% under Dirichlet label skew (alpha = 1, 0.5, and 0.1, respectively). FedProx was not significantly different from FedAvg at any heterogeneity level (McNemar p > 0.3). Grad-CAM and SmoothGrad explanations were evaluated on 380 test images. Both attributed more energy to the leaf than chance (0.70-0.78 versus 0.60), while Grad-CAM maps from federated and centralized models showed Spearman correlations of 0.74-0.76. Agreement decreased as heterogeneity increased, lesion localization was only modestly above chance, and a model-randomization test indicated that SmoothGrad maps depended substantially on image structure rather than learned parameters. In this setting, label skew reduced federated accuracy by 0.6-1.6 percentage points relative to centralized training. FedAvg largely preserved Grad-CAM behavior, while FedProx provided no measurable benefit.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.06221
