Abstract
French users may omit apostrophes and diacritics or make keyboard typos in everyday input. The effects of these common variations on language model performance and prediction reliability remain insufficiently understood. To address this gap, we construct a controlled French surface-variant benchmark covering seven task types, with 4,200 original-low-high triplets (12,600 input instances). Each high-intensity variant retains all low-intensity edits and adds further changes. We evaluate six models from two LLM families. The results show that accuracy decreases and Brier score and negative log-likelihood (NLL) increase with perturbation intensity. Larger models show smaller accuracy losses under high intensity, but increases in Brier score and NLL do not consistently decrease with scale. Keyboard typos cause the largest losses in accuracy and the quality of predicted probabilities at the predefined high-intensity settings. Finally, calibration temperatures fitted on original inputs transfer effectively to surface variants. Combining calibration with input restoration further improves Brier score and NLL over either method alone while preserving restored accuracy. Our benchmark provides a unified framework for jointly evaluating task accuracy and prediction reliability under common French surface variations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33493
