Abstract
RVL-CDIP is the de facto standard benchmark for document classification, and reported accuracy on it is now 98.8%. In this paper, we audit RVL-CDIP for data quality issues and find that approximately 10.5% of its 400,000 documents have erroneous labels and that 35.2% of the test set has a duplicate or near-duplicate in the training set. Identification codes on the pages are sufficient to classify at 69% accuracy, and a state-of-the-art model loses 11 points without them. Image-only models trained on RVL-CDIP lose 16 to 28 points on documents from other sources, and the choice of OCR engine changes accuracy by 4.1 to 8.3 points. We find that nearly 16,000 RVL-CDIP documents contain sensitive personal data, and produce de-identified versions of these documents. We re-benchmark 25 models, and with all defects remediated, the 13 that we retrain are 0.9 to 2.9 points more accurate than in the original condition; the most accurate of them, LayoutLMv3, is 96.5% accurate. We release the corrected corpus, the annotations and the out-of-distribution data.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32126
