Lip synchronization, the task of generating realistic lip movements synchronized with audio signals, is fundamental to applications such as film dubbing, virtual avatars, and digital content creation. Recent GAN-based methods offer computational efficiency but often lack visual fidelity, while diffusion-based approaches achieve high-quality results at the cost of substantial computational overhead. Moreover, most existing methods are limited to photo-realistic human faces, restricting their applicability to stylized characters and non-human entities. In this paper, we propose an efficient universal lip-sync video generation framework that achieves high-quality results without compromising computational efficiency. We build on LivePortrait, a warp-based portrait animation model, and introduce a training strategy that aligns audio signals to an implicit motion space by distilling knowledge from a pre-trained video-to-motion model. This enables real-time inference while maintaining high visual fidelity, and naturally generalizes to diverse stylistic characters beyond photo-realistic humans. Furthermore, we introduce an expressive control gate that enables explicit manipulation of emotional expressions for content enrichment. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in both visual quality and lip-sync accuracy while ensuring real-time inference.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09074
Face Anti-Spoofing (FAS) must distinguish genuine faces from presentation attacks. A unified Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) is an attractive solution: it detects physical attacks (print, replay, mask) in one model and produces interpretable forensic evidence via Chain-of-Thought (CoT). A central obstacle to post-training such a model with reinforcement learning is that FAS reasoning has no rule-verifiable ground truth: only the binary verdict is checkable, while the reasoning chain cannot be verified by any hand-crafted rule. Optimizing the verdict alone is therefore a sparse, hackable signal. The model can reach the correct answer through a shortcut such as a false-rejection bias, which does not generalize. We address this with a grounding-aware judge reward. A 32B vision-language judge scores each reasoning chain against the image on evidence anchoring, logical coherence, and domain knowledge, turning the image itself into the verification signal. The reward is applied in a Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) stage after CoT supervised fine-tuning. It is the judge, rather than the RL objective, that supplies the process supervision a verdict-only reward cannot. Our study starts from a model that already performs well In-Domain (ID) after CoT-based supervised fine-tuning and asks how to improve its Out-of-Domain (OOD) generalization. We find that grounding-aware rewards are an effective means to that end. We validate the method on OOD generalization, where the reward reduces ACER on two physical benchmarks (LCC-FASD 0.288 to 0.273, MSU-MFSD 0.431 to 0.409) while preserving ID accuracy (CelebA-Spoof 0.033 to 0.035). Against ResNet-50/101 and CLIP-ViT-B/16 baselines, the MLLM dominates ID and matches or surpasses the strongest baseline OOD. To our knowledge this is the first use of LLM-as-judge process supervision for FAS.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09047
As language agents tackle increasingly complex tasks, they increasingly rely on multiple agents to coordinate specialized work, requiring decisions not only about what each subagent should do but also which tools and workspace resources it should access. Existing agent systems provide mechanisms for controlling tools and execution environments, but do not directly specify the resources required by each delegated subtask. Moreover, task outcomes and execution trajectories alone provide limited supervision for determining whether a subagent has received appropriate permissions. We observe that Agent Skills encode procedural knowledge describing the operations, tools, and files required at each step, providing a natural source of supervision for authorization. Building on this observation, we synthesize tasks and step-by-step procedures from Skills, execute them through subagent delegation in interactive environments, and use verified trajectories to construct training data for task execution and authorization. On ClawArena-Team, our method improves tool permission precision by 13.4 percentage points and workspace permission precision by 24.1 percentage points, while increasing overall task success by 11.6 percentage points for Qwen3.5-35B-A3B. On Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SkillsBench, our method remains competitive with existing agent data synthesis approaches. These results show that the procedural knowledge embedded in Agent Skills provides a source of supervision for precise subagent orchestration that task outcomes alone cannot provide.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08905
The number of domain fine-tuned models, particularly in the biomedical domain, is rapidly expanding. Fine-tuning promises high-performing models at a fraction of the cost of training a base model, but it can also produce unintended behavioral changes. Multiple studies have shown that safety guardrails can erode with fine-tuning, yet large-scale studies across model architectures, data mixtures, and fine-tuning methodologies remain limited. Where prior work in this space has studied value-centric refusal, this work focuses on knowledge-centric abstention. We audit 25 biomedical domain fine-tuned large language models against 11 paired base checkpoints on MedAbstain and ClinDet-Bench to evaluate the impact of fine-tuning on knowledge-centric abstention. We find that defined appropriate abstention measured by these benchmarks, already low in base models (median 8.3% on MedAbstain), falls further after fine-tuning (median 4.2%, decreasing in 21 of 25 pairs on MedAbstain), and that the magnitude and direction of change are heterogeneous across pairs. These results motivate fine-tuning methods that improve domain-specific capability while preserving appropriate caution.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08780
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit vulnerabilities to adversarial perturbations that can induce unintended responses. These vulnerabilities can be identified via intentional attacks and subsequently used to improve model safety. In black-box settings where gradients are inaccessible, existing methods tend to guess adversarial transformations using external knowledge, ignoring the information provided by the target model. To mitigate this, we propose a trainable black-box framework based on reinforcement learning, which learns from the target model to generate tailored adversarial transformations. We demonstrate that our approach achieves lower post-attack accuracy, greater query efficiency and better semantic preservation on both natural language inference and generative Q&A tasks. On natural language inference, it drives post-attack accuracy to 2% within 20 queries. Against generative language models, our trained attacker consistently achieves lower post-attack accuracy than the untrained attacker and wins in 4 out of 6 settings when compared to a strong optimization-based baseline. We further experiment with multiple reward designs and training settings, and we find that no design or setting is consistently dominant. Our code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08711
Video-based misinformation spreads rapidly on social media, but almost all existing fact-checking systems focus exclusively on English text. Tools for low-resource languages such as Turkish are severely limited. In this work, we present TeViD (Turkish Video Fact-checking Dataset), to the best of our knowledge the first multimodal video fact-checking dataset for Turkish. We compiled the dataset from articles published by this http URL, an IFCN-certified organisation, and enriched it with translated Snopes articles and synthetic examples to reduce class imbalance. Building on TeViD, we develop two verification pipelines that share the same open-source base model. First, in 3MFact-TR (Pipeline 1), we adapt the multi-role 3MFact framework to Turkish with the Qwen2.5-7B large language model and the Qwen2-VL-7B vision-language model, and add three modules of our own: a semantic inconsistency checker, a 5W1H question manager, and a bilingual evidence retriever that excludes fact-checking sites to prevent leakage. Second, as our Fine-Tuned Model (Pipeline 2), we fine-tune a single Qwen2.5-7B with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to produce closed-book verdicts from the claim and the video's textual description. We report accuracy, macro F1, True class F1, and True class recall for both systems, together with ablation studies.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08651
Understanding building facades is central to urban digital twins, heritage modelling, and sustainable city analysis, yet existing LiDAR benchmarks stop at geometry and semantic segmentation and offer little support for reasoning about the functional role of each architectural element. We introduce HFX3D, a large-scale urban facade benchmark of approximately 492 million LiDAR points from 26 buildings in Halifax, Canada, captured across four seasons, day and night, and varied weather. Each facade is annotated at three tiers, semantic, instance, and per-instance functional attributes, making it, to our knowledge, the first facade dataset to pair geometry and semantics with functional labels. Annotations are produced by a semi-automatic pipeline that combines geometry-guided heuristics with expert validation. We benchmark representative point-based, graph-based, convolutional, and transformer architectures and find that semantic segmentation is already challenging under severe class imbalance, while instance separation of repetitive structures and functional reasoning from geometry are substantially harder. The benchmark establishes a new foundation for function-aware 3D urban understanding. Project page: this https URL ; code: this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08645
Financial institutions construct knowledge graphs (KGs) from shared SEC 10-Ks to serve risk analysis, portfolio management, and investment research, whose analytical needs differ. Extraction must adapt without fragmenting shared grounding, typing, and temporal rules. Hand-authored persona prompts and fine-tuning add cost. Weight-free prompt optimization offers an alternative, but unconstrained evolution of a monolithic prompt can rewrite shared rules alongside persona guidance, obscuring changes and complicating review. We introduce FinEvolveKG, a KG-construction harness separating reusable general and persona-policy blocks and mechanically confining GEPA, a reflective prompt optimizer, to the designated block. During persona adaptation, the approved general block remains byte-stable and every optimizer edit is localized to a separately versioned persona policy. A dual objective balances generic temporal-KG quality with persona-relevant facts, motifs, and multi-hop connectivity. We evaluate five mutation scopes on ticker-disjoint 10-K splits, with three seeds for the persona-conditioned arms (v3-v5) across three personas. On the three-seed mean, the complete two-stage block-constrained workflow (v4) improves over the frozen prompt baseline (v1) by 19.4-30.9% and over the tested unconstrained full-prompt workflow (v5) by 2.2-6.4%, leading v5 on both objective components and winning all nine paired-seed comparisons with the lowest seed variance in every persona. Without further optimization, v4 also exceeds v5 across all evaluated out-of-distribution (OOD) shifts. An SME audit supports using the generated triplets as ground truth; a blinded two-SME audit favors v4 over v5 in 70.1% of contrast-enriched judgments. These results show that mechanically attributable evolution can coexist with strong empirical performance, without attributing the gains causally to the boundary.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08643
Safety benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) commonly use multiple-choice question (MCQ) format. However, prior studies documented that MCQ format reduces refusal rates, which may significantly affect the safety behavior of the model. We provide a first mechanistic explanation of this effect on the Weapons of Mass Destruction Proxy (WMDP) dataset across two models - Llama-3.1-8B and Qwen3-8B. First, we use the tuned lens technique to show that when processing MCQ the model commits to an answer-letter token very quickly, which is in contrast to the gradual refusal build-up in open-ended formats. Additionally, we observe that activations on the MCQ format lie roughly 3x further from the refusal direction, compared with their open-ended counterparts. Moreover, ablating the attention heads that carry the MCQ format answer increases the refusal, which is a direct evidence that the MCQ answer-selection competes with refusal. These findings indicate that MCQ safety scores primarily measure knowledge capabilities and do not assess the safety-mechanisms.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08639
Modern video models possess strong visual priors, yet do not natively represent human action in metric 3D space. We present EgoGeneralist, which adapts pretrained video generators to unify action-conditioned egocentric video generation, pose estimation, and joint action-video generation. Our role-adaptive action renderer provides video-native representations for multidirectional action-video learning, making metric motion usable as both a spatial control signal and a recoverable generation target. Cross-stream action-video coupling establishes close correspondence between metric motion and visual dynamics through lightweight adaptation while preserving the pretrained visual prior. Together, these designs establish a generalist framework spanning five action-video tasks. Despite adaptation only on controlled laboratory recordings, EgoGeneralist generalizes to diverse unseen scenes and interactions with effective action control and visual quality, bridging pretrained visual knowledge and metric 3D human motion.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08477
Reproducing machine learning experiments requires reconstructing procedures from information scattered across papers, released code, and supporting artifacts. For coding agents, reproduction success can therefore depend on their ability to fill in missing details, rather than on the released artifacts alone. We ask whether preserving recovered procedures and decisions improves subsequent independent reproduction. We define a standardized artifact design comprising a refined codebase, environment setup, experiment launchers, and a reproduction guide, and introduce ReproBridge, an agent workflow for constructing these refined reproducible artifacts. ReproBridge-Bench provides 1,029 tasks from 387 experiments across 36 papers, anchored by five human-verified reference scores per task. Agents attempt tasks in fresh sessions with raw code or refined artifacts; a separate Auditor checks execution evidence. Across four evaluated models, refined artifacts raise mean reproduction success from 76.4% to 92.6% and reduce downstream API spending by 19.7% on average. The cross-model success-rate spread narrows from 21.6 to 3.9 percentage points, with all four models achieving mean success rates above 90%. Removing any component reduces success in the ablation study, with the largest losses from code and environment removal. These results suggest that preserving execution knowledge helps even models with lower raw-code success reproduce experiments more reliably and at lower API cost.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08452
Neural networks are likely to be among the most consequential artefacts in human history. As these systems become more capable and autonomous, their potential to cause societal harm also grows, making AI safety one of the defining challenges of our time. Yet we continue to build increasingly powerful systems without fully understanding how they work, how they will behave in unfamiliar situations, or how to reliably control them. Mechanistic interpretability offers a path towards understanding these systems by studying their internal representations and computations, with the aim of evaluating, predicting, and controlling behaviour. We survey mechanistic interpretability for AI safety in order to answer the question: Does understanding how models work actually make them safer? We place mechanistic interpretability in the broader context of interpretability research and compare its mechanistic evidence with behavioural evaluation. We introduce the foundations of mechanistic interpretability, including features, polysemanticity, transformer computation, and circuits, and survey methods for feature extraction and analysis, circuit discovery and causal verification, explaining intermediate representations in natural language, learning dynamics, and training-data attribution. Beyond surveying existing methods, we propose a unified framework for evaluating mechanistic interpretability claims and characterise six research orientations by their goals, assumptions, and trade-offs. Finally, we examine how mechanistic understanding can support AI safety, including knowledge editing, steering, and monitoring, and assess its limitations, failure modes, open problems, and relationship to behavioural safety measures. We also release a repository of code notebooks with worked examples that reproduce key findings from surveyed methods, allowing readers to build intuition through hands-on experimentation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08438
Current medical benchmarks typically break down clinical competence into isolated factual questions, single-image tasks, or static case vignettes. These tests score individual answers, but reveal less about whether a model can integrate subspecialty knowledge with multimodal evidence and track a patient's condition throughout a course of care. To close this gap, we introduce NPCBench, a clinical apprenticeship benchmark for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). NPCBench mirrors specialist training, from guideline and foundational knowledge to case planning, longitudinal review, CarePath integration, and open-ended consultation. It contains 4,777 component and consultation items and a 100-patient CarePath cohort with 417 scored diagnostic and care tasks. The episode-level evaluation tests whether diagnostic and care answers are jointly correct within a care pathway. By linking stepwise tasks to patient-level care trajectories, NPCBench evaluates whether models ground decisions in visual evidence, interpret changes in patient state, and meet clinical requirements in consultation. Across 30 evaluated models, we observe a composition gap: strong performance on individual tasks does not ensure jointly correct diagnostic and care answers for the same patient. Among 21 multimodal models, strict CarePath success reaches at most 23%. Paired controls and physician calibration further examine evidence grounding, longitudinal revision, and consultation judging. Overall, NPCBench broadens the evaluation of medical artificial intelligence beyond static question-answering paradigms to an apprenticeship-oriented assessment of clinical workflows, thereby offering a testbed for evidence-based and temporally coherent reasoning in oncology care.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08369
AI agents store text as embedding vectors and compress them at scale. A compression is accepted when each item's nearest neighbors survive, but agents also consolidate, delete, and compare memories, tasks that depend on which items lie far apart. We evaluate both ends with two label-free fidelities from our prior work: the local fidelity $L$ at 10 neighbors and the global fidelity $G$ at 30 to 50 percent of the memory. At 96 bytes per passage, rescored binary codes reach an $L$ of 0.97 yet move 10.1 percent of passages to another theme; PCA with 8-bit codes, at an $L$ of 0.77, moves 1.7 percent. Rescoring leaves the stored codes, and thus $G$, unchanged. We prove that across the $G$ band, $1-\nu_k$ is at most 2 to 2.18 times the square root of the near-far rank-violation rate, and that this rate follows the distance noise of the compression (correlation 0.979). Our locality-aware quantization (LAQ) turns the bound into a hinge objective on the codebooks of an OPQ index, keeping its bytes, rotation, and search. To our knowledge, LAQ is the first quantizer whose objective comes from a proven bound on the far end. Reconstruction alone raises $G$ in 0 of 52 held-out runs; the far hinge raises it in all 52. LAQ raises $G$ in all 52 ($p=8.5\times 10^{-4}$ over 13 memory-encoder groups), including the external FinDER memory, has the highest $G$ of seven equal-size quantizers in all 12 Multi-Doc-2025 runs, scales to a million passages, and keeps evidence recall.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08341
Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a fundamental NLP task concerned with the identification and categorization of subjective information in text. While lexicon-based methods offer transparency, they often struggle with linguistic phenomena such as negation and intensification. Syntactic parsing has been integrated into SA pipelines to address this, but conventional parsers introduce significant computational overhead. Recent work shows that reformulating dependency parsing as a Sequence Labeling (SEL) task can improve efficiency. We propose and compare two strategies for integrating syntactic knowledge into a neural sentiment analysis model under unified Multi-Task Learning (MTL). The first, Standard-MTL, jointly learns dependency parsing (via sequence labeling) and sentiment polarity classification using a shared encoder with two task-specific heads. The second, Contrastive-MTL, provides implicit syntactic guidance through a contrastive auxiliary objective and a syntax-biased attention pooling mechanism, without requiring explicit label prediction. Both rely on syntactic annotations during training and eliminate need for hand-crafted compositional rules or external parsing at inference. We evaluate eleven datasets spanning seven languages---the MARC corpus (English, Spanish, French, German) and seven datasets from SemEval-2022 Task 10 (English, Spanish, Norwegian, Basque, Catalan)---using four established SEL encodings. With the relative encoding, Contrastive-MTL outperforms a syntax-naive baseline on 10 of 11 datasets and surpasses the external rule-based pipeline (SELSP) that parses at inference on all six datasets where the latter applies, while being 1.5--9$\times$ faster at evaluation. Standard-MTL is more dataset- and encoding-dependent. These results show implicit syntactic supervision during training can match or exceed explicit parsing at inference without computational overhead.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08323
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in biomedical and cognitive neuroscience, but their ability to reason reliably over heterogeneous knowledge graphs (KGs) remains unclear. We benchmark five LLMs (GPT-5.1, Gemini 2.0 Pro, Llama 3, Qwen, and BioGPT) across five KGs: DrugBank, NeuroSynth, Cognitive Atlas, Brain Map, and GDPKG. We introduce a multitier query dataset to evaluate reasoning depth and factual accuracy under KG-aware (graph-grounded) and KG-agnostic conditions. Inter-annotator agreement was substantial, with Cohen's kappa of 0.781 (range: 0.753-0.807) and Fleiss' kappa of 0.77. Results show that general-purpose models, particularly GPT-5.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro, generally outperform domain-specific models on multi-hop and high-level reasoning tasks, although performance declines as query complexity increases. KG grounding reduces hallucination rates across all evaluated models. Contrary to our initial hypothesis, domain-specific models do not consistently outperform general-purpose models on specialized tasks without graph grounding. These findings highlight the value of combining broad language-model capabilities with structured domain knowledge. We provide practical guidance for selecting LLM-KG integration strategies based on task complexity and computational constraints, and discuss hybrid neurosymbolic architectures for personalized medicine, cognitive disorder diagnosis, and explainable AI.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08315
Wind farm power control can help the system maintain balance and avoid blackouts. In Europe, this can be achieved through implicit balancing, where a wind farm adjusts its power setpoint in anticipation of the imbalance price using information published by the Transmission System Operator. Thereby, the wind farm helps restore system balance while also reducing its own imbalance costs resulting from forecast errors. However, implicit balancing is a challenging problem since the settlement price is unknown in advance and can be impacted by the pursued control strategy. Reinforcement learning methods could help to solve this problem, but lack the interpretability needed to be deployed on real wind farms. Therefore, we propose a policy distillation framework using explainable boosting machines (EBMs), a variant of generalized additive models, to obtain a transparent control policy. To increase the value captured by the EBM model, we introduce a value-oriented perspective to policy distillation inspired by research in the field of energy forecasting. Furthermore, we suggest to include expert knowledge during model design, such that the control strategy is also justifiable to stakeholders. Using real data of the Belgian grid and an offshore wind farm, we find that our value-oriented and expert-based controller can reduce imbalance costs by 82%, while outperforming a price threshold controller as well as a policy distillation baseline using decision trees.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08245
Complex problems with limited context, such as claims, require a means to obtain additional knowledge necessary for solution reasoning. We propose a multi-agent framework, SMART, to obtain knowledge through capturing the implicit state of participating entities in a problem context. SMART curates the state knowledge as diverse, complementary and solution-salient premises using a variety of LLMs and a structured role-based prompt strategy. Using knowledge from these real-world verified curated premises, SMART's knowledge guided solution reasoning improves validation performance up to 20% on complex scientific claims spanning 3 datasets. We show that grounding premises in real-world knowledge is necessary and improves performance up to 5%.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08196
Medical 3D scans and reports are inherently hierarchical, with diagnostic cues concentrated in specific anatomical regions across multiple levels of organization. Yet, most medical vision-language models ignore this structure and fail to focus on clinically relevant anatomy. We introduce MedHiVE, which combines hierarchical vision-language Soft Mixture-of-Experts (SMoE) with contrastive learning to jointly model fine-grained anatomy and global scan context. To our knowledge, MedHiVE is the first framework to route both vision and text tokens through a two-level SMoE hierarchy organized by anatomical scale, coupling this with report-derived anatomy-level contrastive alignment for 3D medical imaging. This replaces the direct region-text alignment of statically pooled features and vision-only hierarchical routing of prior work with dynamic, slot-based cross-modal information flow across anatomical scales. MedHiVE operates via a two-level, learnable token-routing mechanism, where local image and text features are first routed through a local SMoE and then fused by a global SMoE into unified multimodal representations. Contrastive learning aligns both anatomy-level and global vision-language representations in a unified space. Pre-trained on 25,000+ CT scans with anatomical supervision, MedHiVE consistently surpasses 11 state-of-the-art methods across 6 datasets on 3 tasks: segmentation, classification, and detection, demonstrating the importance of hierarchical modeling. The code for MedHiVE is at this http URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08185
Diet is a major determinant of health, yet accurate dietary assessment from free-living meal images remains challenging. Existing retrieval-based Vision-Language Model (VLM) approaches to nutrient estimation typically rely on textual food representations, while, to our knowledge, direct grounding on visually similar annotated meals has not been investigated. We present NutriVisRAG, a retrieval-augmented generation framework that uses a vision encoder to retrieve similar meals with known nutritional annotations and provide them as multimodal in-context exemplars for VLM nutrient estimation at inference time, without task-specific fine-tuning. We evaluate NutriVisRAG across four datasets, four VLMs, three retrieval encoders, and two prompting strategies, including free-living meals from adults with insulin-treated diabetes, where carbohydrate estimates are compared against two dietitians' annotations. Across all 96 configurations (4 datasets x 4 VLMs x 3 retrieval encoders x 2 prompting strategies), NutriVisRAG reduced the primary estimation error in 56, with improvements more frequent under whole-meal (35/48) than per-item prompting (21/48). Across the evaluated configurations, the lowest NutriVisRAG error was below the best Vanilla error in 13 of 16 VLM--dataset pairs. For GPT-5.4-mini, under whole-meal prompting, the best-performing retrieval encoder for each dataset reduced the primary error on all four datasets relative to Vanilla, with reductions of 1.7--35.7%. Overall, our results show that grounding in multimodal exemplars comprising images and respective annotations can improve nutrient estimation at inference time without task-specific fine-tuning, although the benefits remain configuration-dependent.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08054